DEFENCE NOTES
New Delhi, 16 October 2006
Infantry Day
Thoughts
THE GENERAL’S LINE
OF LIES
By B.K. Mathur
Indian Army’s Infantry has sufficient cause for celebrating
its “Day” on 27 October every year. On
this day in 1947, the combat-rich arm saved Srinagar---
and Kashmir--- from the attack of
Pakistan-supported tribals. One Infantry Company, about 130 men on foot,
bravely defeated the attack by a 700-strong force, equipped with Rifles, LMGs
and Mortars, in what is presently remembered as free India’s
first battle of Badgaon, Srinagar.
The famous Battle
set the example of courage and valour seldom equalled in the annals of the
Indian Army. The day is justifiably
celebrated with great pomp and show annually by the most battled-hardened
fighting arm, known as the “Queen of Battles”.
This year’s celebrations and get-togethers serving and
retired infantrymen is of special significance, providing a food for thought.
For the first time in 59 years, the Chief of an enemy’s army has claimed to
have defeated the Indian Army at Kargil in 1999, which was nothing more than an
Infantry operation intended to flush out some enemy soldiers who had sneaked
into the Indian territory and constructed
“conditioned” bunkers. The claim has been made by Pakistan’s President, General
Parvez Musharraf, the Army Chief who planned the Kargil operation, in his
just-published memoirs: In the Line of
Fire, described by many as In the
Line of Lies, in utter frustration following the Pakistan Army’s drubbing
whenever it dared attack India, in 1947-48, 1965, 1971 and 1999.
Musharraf’s claim has been described as a “bluff” by some
and a “military misadventure” by others.
The latter description has been made significantly, Gen. Ali Kuli Khan
Khattak who resigned from the Army in protest against the, then, Prime Minister
Nawaz Sharif’s decision to appoint Musharraf as the Army Chief. Khan has described the Kargil operation as a
disaster, flawed in its conception, tactical planning and execution. He has been quoted as stating that “it
(Kargil) was an unprofessional
decision…… Kargil would continue to haunt him (Musharraf) for the rest of his
life….. Kashmir has damaged the Kashmir
cause…. A disaster bigger than the East Pakistan
tragedy……”
For India,
it was a double triumph in Kargil in 1999---military and diplomatic. Besides
the valour and patriotism which the Indian soldier proved for the umpteenth
time, the Kargil operation was equally significant for the Government of India. It scored a diplomatic triumph. The whole world, including Uncle Sam,
recognized in no uncertain terms that Pakistan was an aggressor and was required to withdraw from the Indian
territory it had illegally occupied for its strategic advantage for future
battles, if it dared to fight against India once more and thrashed. New Delhi showed to the
world it was a peace-loving country and will never ever cross the Line of Control (LoC) to gain strategic
advantage.
In this connection, it needed to be understood that if
India’s aim at Kargil had remained restricted to defeat Pakistan militarily,
the correct strategy would have been, as some IAF Commanders had openly viewed,
that armament and ammunition stores in Pak occupied-Kashmir could be attacked
from the air and the line of communication and supplies to the illegally
constructed “conditioned” bunkers snapped. The strategy could have doubtlessly helped the Indian forces complete the operation
Vijay much faster than they did. In
doing so, Islamabad and the Pak Army Chief
Musharraf could not have complained, because the occupied Kashmir is actually India’s
territory and storing of military machines and ammunition at Skardu could have
been challenged.
Actually, India’s
forces had to fight what may be described as an “unprecedented war”. They were repeatedly asked by the political
leadership not to cross the LoC in
any case Opening of two or three other fronts and encircling of the intruders
after crossing the LoC would have
helped the Indian forces to quicken the completion of the task. This did not
happen contrary to established military operation strategy, because New Delhi did not want
the Pak infiltration to turn into a full-scale war. The Kargil operation, remember, was not a
war, only an operation to throw out the intruders. The task was achieved, unprofessionally though.
However, more important than the triumph at Kargil is the
performance of India’s soldier, who is recognized all over the world as a great
fighter, valiant and courageous from the time he served under the Raj. This is remembered time and again, especially
when the Infantry Day and Regimental “Days” are traditionally celebrated every
year. The Infantryman’s courage to fight under different situations, even with
inferior machines, weapons and weapon systems, as happened against Pakistan in
1965 and 1971, continues till today.
It is now well known that the Indian Infantryman has been
ill-equipped during Kargil and earlier for a mountain battle in sub-zero
temperature. Despite this, the Indian soldier has always risen to the
task. His valour has been appreciated
during the Second World War by none other than Winston Churchill, who had
described him as a great disciplined soldier. This trait was seen in Kargil too,
when the Infantryman wor the “unprofessional
operation”. A number of “YOs” (young officers) were asked to lead the troops
and remove the enemy from unauthorized occupation, sitting comfortably in
“conditioned bunkers” at a height. But
they achieved the target which was “very difficult” by any standard.
There are umpteen instances of deeds of valour of the men in
all the 27 Infantry Regiments of the Indian Army. The acts of bravery of the Indian soldiers
have been appreciated by British Generals under whom they have fought in
various actions. One of many such
observations is what the Governor-General and the Commander-in-Chief of the
British Indian Army made way back in 1897, after the “brilliant defence” of the
Fort Gulistan and the Post of Sarangarhi by the 26 Sikh. Such acts of bravery have been “mentioned for
special reference” by the British commanders during the First and Second World
Wars. Post independence, there are stories galore of Infantrymen who have
fought battles with outstanding performance.
Such is the stock of India’s soldiers. They always rise to the occasion, as
re-established in Kargil in 1999. They
need to be duly recognized and remembered especially on 26 Jly every year,
described as the “Kargil Day”. It is our
duty to keep them in high morale. Their deeds of valour and service to the
nation which they are doing in Kashmir continuously since 1947 needs to be acknowledged. Kargil martyrs and their sacrifices did the
country proud, no matter what the Pakistani General has claimed in his memoirs.
----INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|