Open Forum
New Delhi, 17 January 2024
Ram Temple Consecration
FAREWELL TO SECULARISM?
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
The consecration
of the Ram temple on January 22 may well have the country anoint a Hindu
religious city in Ayodhya like the Vatican City of the Christians or Mecca of
the Muslims, though it has always boasted of being secular. The Father of the nation,
Mahatma Gandhi, or even his direct followers and philosophers could have never
imagined that secularism would yield place to majoritarianism-- the transformation
that has taken place in the last decade raising a lot of heat and dust.
Apart
from the allegation that the consecration of the temple has been timed just
before the Lok Sabha elections, what is more surprising is the Prime Minister’s
claim that God had chosen him as “an instrument to represent all Indians during
the consecration”. This, in response to questions being raised over his
pre-eminence at the event. Modi said he had begun his 11-day special observance
as prescribed in the scriptures to “awaken divine consciousness” within himself
in the lead-up to the consecration. However, he did not specify what he meant
by special observance.
Though
the secular spirit is now being slowly vanishing from society, Mahatma Gandhi
himself never went to a Hindu temple. Only once he visited the Meenakshi temple
in Madurai in 1946 after the shrine was opened to Dalits to enter the premises.
Though Gandhiji described himself as a Hindu, his writings bear testimony to
his profound religious feelings, his understanding of Hinduism which was
completely different from what we see today and his chosen mode of worship was
inter-faith meetings, held in open grounds where Hindus, Muslims, Parsis,
Sikhs, Jains and Christians would pray together from verses of all scriptures.
The Mahatma tried to show that India belonged to all faiths equally and
propagated the essence of different religious faiths and doctrines.
The
Mahatma believed in the plurality of religions and abhorred any concept of the
superiority of some races or religions. Stressing the need for equal respect
for all religions, Gandhiji observed: “While I believe myself to be a Hindu, I
know that I do not worship God in the same manner as any one or all of them”. This
perception of the Mahatma cannot be said to be the majority view in the society
today. The ruling dispensation has made us believe that we should be proud of
our religion and in the process, denigrate other religions and the sentiments
of those who do not subscribe to the Hindu line of thinking.
It would
be pertinent here to mention that just a few days back, over 3000 Christians
from across the country registered a protest against community leaders’
culpable silence on minority rights and other grim realities while
participating in the Prime Minister’s Christmas celebrations. In an open letter
released recently, it stated: “The hard truth is that the Prime Minister and
his government have consistently disregarded their constitutional mandate, be
it to the minorities, the Adivasis, the Dalits, the backward castes, the
farmers, labourers, migrants etc. hence their gratitude to the Prime Minister
was not in our name”.
The
letter further emphasised that since 2014; in particular, Christians in India
have been victims of continued attacks and vilification from members of the
ruling establishment across the country. It was indeed distressing to note that
the letter even referred to Christians and Christian schools which “have been
hounded and harassed, their places of worship destroyed, they have been denied
their ordinary rights as citizens and been subjected to denigration and demonisation.”
If this
happens to be the attitude of the Christian community, one can easily presume
how the Muslims have been treated or, to use the right phrase humiliated, and
what they think of the present government and its attitude towards the
minorities. Obviously, the present genre of Muslims cannot be blamed for what
their forefathers have done, and they have a right to life, being citizens of
this democratic country.
This
brings us to the moot question i.e., while Ram is being worshipped and a grand
temple being built in his honour, can the country claim to have introduced ‘ram
rajya’ in India. The answer obviously is a big no. The ruling dispensation
has been rather poor in matters of governance and the entire development
process has largely ignored the lower echelons of society. The bottom tiers of
society have been greatly affected as the disparity in society has widened. Not
just income disparity between the rich and the poor but also between the urban
and the rural class, between the formal and the informal sectors, between
industrial workers and farmers etc. In the context of such development, all
talks of India emerging the third largest economy by virtue of increased wealth
of business tycoons such as Ambanis, Adanis and the Tatas appear meaningless.
Truth,
justice, equality are steadily vanishing from today’s society where violence,
jealousy and hatred is manifest. Thus, while eulogising Ram without following
the principles that he stood for and the way he ruled his kingdom smacks of
nothing but hypocrisy. Moreover, unlike Swami Vivekananda, Lord Ram is just a
mythological figure as the Anthropological Survey of India (ASI) did not find
any scientific evidence of Ayodhya being his birthplace.
Moreover,
religion has always been regarded as a private affair, but the ruling
dispensation has made it a political issue, obviously to reap benefits from the
coming Lok Sabha elections due shortly. While the Congress has decided to
boycott the inauguration on these grounds, the three Shankaracharyas have also
decided to skip the event for being held against what they consider
scripture-mandated norms.
It may
be mentioned here that Jawaharlal Nehru had adopted a stance, underlining the
need for the State to keep its distance from religion. However, the current
Prime Minister has projected himself as the sole guarantor of Hindu religion
and his party, along with the RSS, to propagate and spread Hinduism in the
world, though of a distorted version, much different from Vivekananda’s
approach of unity of all religion.
A
section of political analysts and sociologists are quite surprised at the
trajectory of the country’s political development to being a Hindu state. All
the fanfare about the Ram temple is just to ensure that the BJP is assured of a
landslide victory in the elections. And this is destined to happen as education
and awareness has yet to trickle down to the masses in the backward areas of
the country. They leave their destiny to the almighty.---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|