Open Forum
New
Delhi, 10 January 2024
Economic Concerns 2024
FOOD PRICES, POOR PVT INVESTMENT
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
The
economy is always a matter of debate and the new year has started with concerns
expressed by members of Reserve Bank of India’s monetary policy committee about
volatile food prices. The vegetable price inflation has been manifesting
since November and this is expected to continue in the months ahead. As Michael
Patra, RBI Deputy Governor rightly pointed out that food prices in India “are
the underlying component of inflation” and this is expected to continue in
2024. Moreover, climate will remain a key influence on food production and
inflation as El Nino conditions are expected to continue.
Another
important factor is that debt has been increasing fast and the International Monetary
Fund stated that it may reach “100% of debt to GDP ratio” by the year 2028.
However, the Finance Ministry clarified that the roll-over risk is low for
domestic debt and the exposure to volatility in exchanged rates tend to be on
the lower side. Reports indicate that the government will have to either trim
expenditure or target higher revenue for the current fiscal as the nominal GDP
is estimated to grow slower. Moreover, the fiscal deficit may reach 6% of GDP.
Also, high interest rates, fiscal consolidation and slowing global growth are
not quite favourable.
Recently,
Trinamool Congress leader, Derek O’Brien, stated that “from 2014 to 2023, the
price of rice has gone by 56%, wheat by 59%, milk by 61% and tur dal by 120%”.
According to him, 21 lakh workers from West Bengal have not received wages for
the last two year under the MGNREGA. Around 150 farmers are committing suicide
every day and India has 28 crore poor people, ‘the highest for any country’.
In spite
of all this, optimistically speaking the overall economic signs are quite
encouraging with the year-to-year data rise in the stock market estimated at
over 18% while the increase from October may be around 14-15% and the growth
momentum maintained. Forecasts have been quite positive with the IMF prediction
that India is expected to grow above 6% over the next five years, driven by
strong investment, strong economic fundamentals, digitalisation-driven
productivity gains despite widespread global uncertainty. The IMF, in its article
IV consultation report observed a robust public capex agenda, which will
support India’s wide-ranging infrastructure needs, is expected to boost growth
while crowding-in private investment and growth is projected at 6.3% in both
FY24 and FY 25.
“Noting
that India is one of the fastest growing economies globally, the directors
called for continued appropriate policies to sustain economic stability and for
further progress in key structural reforms to unleash India’s significant
potential”, as per the report. Further it pointed out that India’s economy
showed robust growth over the past year though headline inflation has, on
average, moderated although it remains volatile. But what is surprising is that
whether high GDP growth can be considered the index of true development though
urban-based economists are always found to glorify the high rates of growth?
An
important point that needs to be mentioned here is the lack of private
investment and the economic strength is manifest only from public sector
investment. It is intriguing that in spite of various incentives given by the
present government, private investment has not picked up to the desired scales
and is much lower compared to the other emerging economies of the world.
This
apart, assessing economic growth is just not the incomes generated but the job
potential of the investment made. In this connection, one may refer to the
central bank’s December round of consumer confidence which reveals that
consumers lowered their expectations of employment and prices as they expected
a change in the scenario. It is difficult to foresee or forecast any
perceptible change unless there is a surge in investment by the private sector
in 2024. There is also need to give a renewed thrust on manufacturing though a number
of initiatives have been undertaken by the present government.
It
cannot be denied that while attempts to strengthen the economy are in full
swing, there is a need to analyse whether the benefits are reaching all
segments of society. The moot question at this juncture is whether convictions
along with the positive settings will encourage businesses to take risk and
come out with substantial investments. It is well-known that the long-term
weakness in India has largely been due to the shyness of the private sector,
specially in manufacturing, though we see enough investments in safe sectors
such as health and education. Even after the pandemic, investment by the
private sector has not picked up to the desired extent. Moreover, employment-oriented
industries are more or less ignored by the corporate sector.
To
attract private investment, one may suggest that areas in backward regions
should be earmarked for private entities with `necessary infrastructure to
facilitate setting up of employment-oriented factories, which could not just
open up job opportunities for the skilled youth but also help change the
complexion of the area. This is indeed crucial for overall economic growth
because unless the youth are gainfully employed, the concept of true
development is lost.
The
disturbing fact is that the focus of the economy is on the urban sector which,
directly or indirectly, is benefiting the rich and the middle class. This
resulted in consumption increase but most economists believe consumption demand
has indeed been problematic with the top 40% of households going for excessive
expenditure. This points to the fact that the lower 20% of the population is facing
financial crisis due to stagnant income and is not in a position to increase even
its basic consumption, that is, of healthy food for themselves and their
family. This can be viewed from the fact that agriculture grew at a mere 1.2%
in the second quarter and full fiscal growth is likely to remain subdued as
kharif food production is estimated to fall and rabi crop faces stress.
In fact,
an economic analysis of per capita allocation of resources would reveal that
the rural sector, specially the backward regions, inhabited by scheduled tribes
and lower castes has been grossly neglected. As suggested earlier, some of
these areas could be transformed into industrial hubs for small-scale
manufacturing or even tourist attraction centres. There needs to be a plan
which should be prepared at the panchayat level and sent to the Centre via the
state government for infrastructural support. Both objectives of backward area
development and employment generation could be achieved through these
initiatives. A fresh look is required. ---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|