Political Diary
New Delhi, 3 October 2023
Water Wars
HOW WILL INDIA QUENCH THIRST?
By Poonam I Kaushish
Our first major climate catastrophe
is at the doorstep: The search for water and its management has become the most
harrowing task for 21st century India. Almost two-thirds of our reservoirs are
running below normal water levels. Questionably, where will India get its water
in coming years? Specially against the backdrop of multiple inter-State
disputes over water-sharing.
Last week’s 31ST North
Zone Council comprising Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Himachal and Union
territories meet did just that wherein Union
Home Minister Shah requested all States to resolve their inter-water disputes “with
an open mind and mutual discussion.”
Currently, Punjab,
Haryana and Rajasthan are locked in separate water disputes. Punjab and Haryana
spoke about “emotive” Sutlej Yamuna Link (SYL) canal which has been a bone of
contention between them for several decades. While Punjab Chief Minister Mann strongly
opposed sharing “even a single drop of the canal’s water as it has dried up and
could lead to serious law and order issues. Instead, Ganga-Yamuna waters should
be supplied to Punjab through Sutlej alongside setting up a new Tribunal as per
new terms of reference.”
His Haryana counterpart
Khattar, wanted completion of SYL
canal’s construction in Punjab as it would enable productive utilization of
valuable water resources. He also emphasized importance of SYL as an
alternative channel to the aging Nangal Hydel Channel.
Down South once again Karnataka and
Tamil Nadu are locked in battle over sharing Cauvery waters, despite Cauvery
Water Regulatory Committee’s direction to Karnataka to release 3,000 cusecs
water to its neighbour. Friday saw the State ‘shut’ by Bandh to oppose release
of water to Tamil Nadu and plans to challenge the Committee’s ruling in Supreme
Court. Notwithstanding, this dispute was resolved, but of course, it is not.
Pertinently, Sutlej and Cauvery are only
tip of the iceberg. Inter-State disputes over water-sharing have grown over the
years and become major politically volatile issues. More so, post bifurcation
of big States, leading to inter-State political and legal battles wherein no
State wants to release water to another.
This at a time when 11 river basins
including Ganga will be water deficit by 2025, threatening over billion lives
with the challenge getting graver by 2050 as demand will rise to 1,180 million
cubic metres, 1.65 times the current levels even as fresh water resources
dwindle. Think, India has 18% of world's population but only 4% usable water,
wastes more than it produces and spends billions on inane projects instead of
focusing on water conservation.
Besides, instead of finding durable
and sustainable solutions to the problem, the Centre has taken recourse to
short-cuts and quick-fix remedies which have compounded the mess. leading to States
taking independent action in brazen violation of tribunal awards.
Already, Centre is embroiled in
sorting out water-sharing disputes between Andhra-Karnataka over Krishna
waters, Maharashtra-Karnataka over Godavari, Goa-Karnataka over Mandel-Mandovi
Basin and Madhya Pradesh-Gujarat over Narmada etc. Despite the Inter-State
Waters Dispute Act 1956 setting up five tribunals to go into the matter.
Alongside, Parties rake up water
issues for their political survival, failing to realize that our rivers are
being over-exploited and increasingly polluted by being used as dumping grounds
for industrial waste and garbage. Notwithstanding crores spent on them like
Ganga-Yamuna and rural water schemes, wells are dry and women continue to trek
long distances for water.
At other times, State interests
override national concerns. Many States refuse to honour a tribunal award or
rescind its agreement. Telengana has asked Centre to relook the River Krishna
water-sharing award as it is being unfairly treated by Andhra, Maharashtra and
Karnataka through which the river flows.
The Government’s solution? Look
skywards to ward off the crisis, ignoring that due to global warming glaciers
are melting rapidly. Questionably, where will India get its water in the coming
years?
Realizing the gravity Modi perhaps
can take a leaf out of Ambedkar plan to encourage a permanent solution between
States: ‘Water sharing equity’ through a Constitutional mechanism by allocating
autonomous governance rights to the Centre to ensure water sharing equity is
met even in distressed years.
Happily, after years of
foot-dragging India will begin work on an $87 billion plan to connect some big
rivers to end floods and droughts. As States which were not flood-prone are now
witnessing calamity and those which flooded, the situation has deteriorated.
All thanks to accumulation of silt in huge quantities in rivers.
Proponents of rivers interlinking
projects claim this would end our water misery as it would help conserve
abundant monsoon water, store it in reservoirs, deliver it using rivers
inter-linking projects to areas which are water scarce and facilitate
navigation and fish farming to broaden income in rural areas.
Further, the surplus flood waters
from Brahmaputra Mahanadi, Ganga and Godavari could be diverted through a
network of canals and dams to water deficient rivers in south India. This would
help boost agricultural production, increase forest cover and bring down
pollution.
Already, six intra-State river
linking schemes, including Sujalam Sufalam, Sabarmati-Saraswati and Bhadar-Mahi
links have started yielding positive results and mitigated potable and
irrigation water woes in several parched and drought-prone areas in north and
central Gujarat, increased greenery and improved the environment.
True, inter-linking of rivers is not
a panacea for all issues as water cannot be created, manufactured in a factory
nor imported like oil. Therefore, management of available water resources
becomes vital for catering to a growing population and changing lifestyle.
Experts hold setting up tribunals
for every dispute does not lead to lasting solutions. Whereby, dispute
resolution operates on permanent ad-hocism, in some fights “formulas”
themselves cause further disagreement. While tribunals largely follow
international norms and practices namely, equitable, reasonable water
utilization and mutual benefit but these have little legal backing.
Consequently, when States challenge these, the legal tangle enlarges the fight
and delays resolution.
Add to it erratic and variable
rainfall, rapidly depleting groundwater, land-use modifications and
water-intensive cropping patterns are intensifying river quarrels as the
existing Inter-State River Water Disputes Act 1956 depends on tribunals as its
main dispute resolution body and the Supreme Court abjudicates on orders by
various tribunals. Confessed Modi, only 8% rainwater gets saved in the country.
Pertinently, the Lok Sabha passed the
Inter-State River Water Disputes (Amendment) Bill 2017 which included a permanent
river water disputes tribunal and a mediation committee. But its implementation
mechanism is still to be worked out. Resulting in States thwarting it or move
court on tribunal’s orders.
But, the problem is
deeper than just demand and supply of water, it’s about our broken relationship
with water. Clearly, without
urgently prioritizing a legislative framework that gives tribunals teeth,
bickering between States will continue, benefiting none.
The need of the
hour is a pragmatic competence and mission mode mindset wherein the long term
focus should be on local water management, restoring local wetlands and water
bodies, water re-use through systematic dual plumbing,
Time now for the Centre to treat
water as a national asset and go for durable long term solutions which needs
national planning geared for local solutions. Else, India will face a severe
water crisis soon and have no water for its growing economy and people. Our
leaders need to stop Zabaani jama khurch as it won’t slake
India’s growing thirst. Remember, water is not State property, it belongs to
all! ---- INFA
(Copyright, India News
& Feature Alliance)
|