Political Diary
New Delhi, 15 August 2023
Bulldozer Governance
DARK CARNIVAL OF DEMOCRACY
By Poonam I Kaushish
Of the various forms of punishment, an eye for an eye is the most primal.
In India it connotates bulldozer which is routinely
used across the country to remove illegal constructions. But today it has assumed pride of place in the Indian
political lexicon as bulldozer governance, after the BJP began projecting it
not just as an inanimate object but as an ‘idea’ meant to cement its nationalistic
politics, couched in the innocuous framework of good and effective governance heralding
a paradigm shift in political thinking.
Notwithstanding, the Opposition accusing the Centre and
BJP-ruled State Governments of using it as a popular extra-judicial tool of ‘hate’
politics to target Muslims since it came to power in 2014. Of systematic oppression under increasingly
authoritarian laws and where democratic freedoms, including free speech,
political representation and right to protest are not only being crushed but
also conducted in an atmosphere of revelry.
Typified by drummers and chants of “Govinda, Govinda” alongside a billboard
which hails “Desh ki
suraksha mein jo banega rora, mama ka bulldozer banega hathod.
The credit for bringing a heavy-duty bulldozer into
political limelight goes to UP’s Chief Minister Yogi aka Bulldozer Baba where
bulldozers were entrusted with the onerous task of upholding rule of law. Due
to its ‘success’ in demolishing homes of the minority community it naturally
found takers in other BJP-ruled states, MP’s Shivraj is hailed as Bulldozer Mama and Haryana’s Khattar as Tau.
This fiesta of chaos orchestrated by Governments’ to
escalate oppression and perpetuate an environment of fear and helplessness
among people should terrify citizens. By conjuring up this celebratory
atmosphere allows the State to reinforce its narrative, dehumanise the
oppressed reducing them to inhuman grotesque spectacles liable to be
manipulated or discarded at the State’s whim.
Alas, our democratic awareness has become so weak that
more and more metaphorical instances of steam-rolling norms and principles
emerge everywhere and every day. Whereby settled legal principles continue to
be flouted and the monster machine has become a political tool to both
construct the perception of a tough leader as well as deepen social divide.
The choreography of such diabolical spectacles is not
limited to literally using bulldozers. An example of this meek abdication is
there for all to see in are legislative functioning. Legislatures have stopped
bothering about holding Governments ’accountable for executive impunity.
Scandalously, Parliament’s monsoon session was witness
to important Bills like the Data Protection Bill being rammed through without
any discussion or being vetted by Parliamentary committees and ordinary Bills
being converted to Money Bills underscoring bulldozer governance. Whereby, our
temple of democracy trashed and stomped out executive answerability to its
citizens.
Alongside, suspending MPs for a day, session or
indefinite periods has become the norm, Congress Lok Sabha leader Chowdary, TMC
and AAP MPS in Rajya Sabha et al. And muting their mikes when they are speaking
in the House a la Congress President
Kharge, TMC’s O’Brien are other strategies in this genre of governance.
The Opposition too is to blame. Instead of using
Parliamentary debates to pin the Government down for its acts of misdemeanor
and non-governance it preferred to play politics. thereby, losing a perfect
opportunity to put the Government on the mat and hold it accountable for
Manipur’s ongoing civil war.
Besides, there are efforts to ensure domination of the
Executive in appointments and supervision shunning procedures creating an
impression of impatience with procedures amidst cynicism about all forms of accountability
as also intervening in States sphere, clearly violating the federal principle.
Example: NEET, National Education Policy and Centre extending jurisdiction of
BSF inside international borders has irked Punjab and West Bengal.
Fundamentally, acceptance of executive high-handedness allows
perpetrators to claim democratic sanction behind bulldozer governance speaks
volumes about the growing societal acceptability of the idea of instant
justice. In the longer run, when the State takes away all protections and when
no law or institution limits this authoritarianism, the rights of citizens can
only be precarious.
Even if the aam
aadmi does not relish the dark carnival, the repeated performances of State
repression can certainly de-sensitise one if it is not followed by expression
of sympathy and empathetic action. Eventually, they become complicit in the
plight of the oppressed and view it as a cultural product as barring the
immediate shock and headlines, media too chooses to ignore it.
One could argue this happens because of our failed
criminal justice system and police high-handedness whereby methods being used
to terrorise people have been perfected after long practice of demolishing
homes without due process on the facetious pleas of unauthorised constructions,
flouting zoning regulations or destruction necessary for the lofty cause of
national development making it impossible to challenge it in court. Sic.
In fact, some States boast of their governance record
on the basis of ‘encounter’ killings. The celebration of the elimination of
suspected criminals by Telengana police of suspected rapists is a case in
point. A dystopian Constitution and an alternative set of laws where the police
(rather than courts) summarily award punishment to persons accused – but not
convicted – of a crime.
The celebration of this bulldozer culture valorises the
active prevention of judicial oversight. Judicial procedures to check the
legitimacy and validity of Government functioning and officials has become a
victim of the prejudices against citizens. While courts revel in non-deliverance
of speedy justice. Instead, they appear keener to protect the rights of
authorities who subvert the law than perform their job of legal oversight. As a
consequence, hapless citizens are crushed by procedural injustice.
Perhaps, one of the main reasons for Governments and
people taking law into their own hands with courts only acting as meek protesters
at best and mute spectators at worst. Resulting in lawlessness being exacerbated
manifold wherein legal falsehoods and subversion of due procedure are considered
par on course.
In this murky carnival, the State employs its unfettered
authority, discriminatory laws, biased policies, selective enforcement and tools
of destruction, bulldozers to deliver a terrifying performance. Whereby, citizens
are props who are entrenched in the State’s complete dominance and transformed
into unwitting spectators of razing their citizenship.
The carnivalesque atmosphere is a deliberate attempt to
suggest to citizens a heightened sense of impunity. It conveys to everyone
loudly that the law will not take its course when a Muslim or X,Y,Z is
victimised --- that anyone can literally dance their way to committing
atrocious acts of injustice.
Undeniably bulldozer governance has seeped
into the collective consciousness of the nation targeting civil society
organisations and human rights defenders precisely so that it can prevent
citizens from acting on their impulse for solidarity. Sadly, it has found many
cheerleaders, never mind if bulldozer justice strikes the core of Constitutionalism,
creating fear among people. To rephrase Mirza
Fidvi’s couplet, “Democracy ka janaaza
hai, zara dhoom se nikle” (It’s the funeral procession of justice, let’s
make it carnivalesque.
Clearly it is time to break free from the
trance of the dark carnival of willingly being bulldozed multitudes. This requires
collective resistance. It remains to be seen if ‘we the people’ have the
collective will. What gives? ---- INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature
Alliance)
|