Economic Highlights
New Delhi, 20 September 2007
The MRP Scandal
CONSUMERS TAKEN FOR
A RIDE
By Dr.Vinod Mehta
(Former Director,
Research, ICSSR)
There are certain things which the Government starts in good
faith, at a certain point of time depending upon a given situation but does not
know what to do with it when it has outlived its utility. One such thing is the “maximum retail price”
requirement or MRP in short.
During the seventies when there were severe shortages of
essential commodities and prices were skyrocketing, a notification was issued
that all the packaged goods would carry the MRP tag so that the skyrocketing
prices could be arrested. Apart from
essential commodities like edible oil, sugar etc., all other not-so-essential
items like soap bars, hair oils, shampoos, biscuits, chocolates, shoes, shirts,
jeans, music systems etc. were also covered by this notification.
For quite a number of years it served the purpose well. But one thing, which everybody missed, was
that the MRP was always set higher than what was warranted; and it continues to
be so even today.
However, in the past 15 years the supply position of many
non-farm goods has completely changed for the better. The end of license raj has enabled the country to
create adequate production capacities for a large number of goods, both fast
moving consumer goods like soaps and shampoos and durable consumer goods like
TVs, refrigerators, cameras etc.
Moreover, the liberal import policies have helped bring in
many consumer goods to India,
which in turn has improved the availability of a large number of consumer
goods. In fact, the competition for
selling goods has become so intense as also the pressure for prices to move
downwards which has made the MRP requirement redundant for a number of goods.
Take for instance a packet of potato wafers with a MRP of
Rs.20. An individual store will sell it for Rs.20 only. But our supermarkets
are full of advertisements saying, “buy one get one free.” It means that one can
buy two packets of potato wafers for Rs.20 or at Rs.10 each. It also means that
by selling a packet of potato wafers for an effective price of Rs.10 the seller
is still making profit. Questionably, why then should the MRP be Rs. 20 when
the effective market price is Rs.10? On which the seller is still making a profit?
This is true of a large number of products like shirts,
trousers, shampoos, biscuits and so on. If a seller sells a shirt for Rs.800
and is willing to give one free then why force the consumer to buy two shirts
under the garb of “buy one get one free” when the effective price of one shirt
is Rs.400 only?
Under the MRP garb sellers are resorting to many other
gimmicks. Camera sellers are happy to sell you a digital camera at a MRP of Rs.10,000
with a free gift of a pen drive worth Rs. 2,000. The question is why not sell
the camera for Rs.8,000 which appears to be the effective market price?
Similarly, if you buy a colour TV you get a DVD player free; why not sell the TV
and DVD players as separate items at effective market prices?
The ridiculous part of the whole thing is that even goods
like shoes, jeans, watches etc. carrying foreign brand names and bought
generally by rich people are also supposed to carry the MRP tag. If a person
can buy a pair of foreign branded shoes for Rs.2,500 he can very well pay
Rs.5,000 or even Rs.10,000 for a similar pair. What does a MRP mean to that
person? What kind of a person are we protecting from the price rise?
The point is that there is a downward pressure on the prices
of a large number of manufactured products but this MRP tag, which has a large
built-in profit margin is keeping the prices at unsustainable higher levels.
The intense competition and large production capacities will ensure low and
competitive prices without the MRP tag. In fact, the prices will find their
market level which will be more realistic than the one indicated by the MRP
tag. Clearly, the MRP is no more relevant now.
Look at it from another angle. Have you ever come across a MRP
for farm produce? One can never have a MRP for farm produce; it fluctuates from
region to region and from season to season depending upon the demand and supply
situation. The Government can intervene in the market by way of a minimum
support price or subsidies to make available grain to poor people at reasonable
prices which is not the same thing as a MRP.
A large number of products like mithai which sells loose and by weight by individual shops never
carries a MRP tag but their prices at these shops are more or less the
same. The reason is competition. It puts
the pressure on the shop owners to keep their prices competitive otherwise
similar products with higher prices will not sell. There are a large number of
other products like biscuits, detergent powder, pickles etc, which are sold
loose and by weight and they never carry a MRP tag and yet the prices have
remained relatively stable and below the MRP tag over the years.
Therefore, except for a few sensitive essential packaged
products like cooking oil, sugar, pulses etc, the MRP requirement can be done
away with without any fear of price rise.
We have entered the era of price wars where the sellers are willing to
increase their profits by selling large volumes rather than selling less at a
very high profit as was the case in the seventies. In the current scenario
producers who are not willing to sell volumes at relatively low margins will
not survive in the competitive environment.
To begin with the manufactured products, instead of a MRP,
may carry the ex-factory price tag plus the excise duty paid on it to give a
fair idea of the price charged by the seller. This tag can also be discarded
after two to three years. Similarly, the imported manufactured goods must carry
the landed price of the good plus the customs duty paid on it which will
provide a fair idea to the consumer about the final price charged by the seller
in India.
The other requirements like date of manufacture and expiry date on packaged
food items produced in the country as well as imported must continue.
In most countries there is no requirement of a MRP for
packaged manufactured products yet the prices are stable. The individual
shops/supermarkets display their own price labels, which may vary from shop to
shop by small margins. These shops/supermarkets also resort to “buy one get one
free” gimmicks but for those products which they have either not been able to
sell or where the expiry date has come close. However, the clearance is not on an
artificially fixed higher price but on the already labelled price which is
known to the consumer.
In short, one can say that the time has come to do away with
the MRP requirement as it is only serving the purpose of keeping prices high at
a time and in a situation where there is a downward pressure on prices of
manufactured products. The price wars will keep the prices under check. The
only thing is to keep a watchful eye on price cartels, which will be the task
of the Competition Commission of India. ----INFA
(Copyright India News and Feature Alliance)
|