Open
Forum
16 April 2014, New
Delhi
Poll Campaign Trail
PATRIARCHAL MIND-SET
By Chanchal Chauhan
The speeches of some leaders on the campaign trail for the
present Lok Sabha elections are highlighted by electronic and print media
because their words against women folk expose their patriarchal mind-set
acquired by them in real life. Times have changed, yet the cultural lag
persists. This too, too solid flesh does hardly melt. Recall this bias against
women hindered the passage of a noble Act that could provide reservation of
seats for women in Parliament.
The utterances of some of the political leaders against
women surely deserve condemnation. A
leader, who is given the status of a semi-god and declared as the
PM-in-waiting, brazenly ignored the existence of his wife and did not mention
her name in the column in his earlier affidavits. His speeches full of male
arrogance hardly show any respect to women politicians including those who are
in his own Party. All these men folk inherit the same patriarchal mind-set that
manifests itself in their attitude towards women.
These leaders are followers of their religions, namely,
Hinduism and Islam. Their patriarchal behaviour is governed by their religious
consciousness that forces them to behave like a lord over women folk. The
essence of this consciousness is that the male governs the sexuality of women
in the same way as a peasant governs the sexuality of his pet ‘cow’. That is
why any woman that exercises her right to choose her mate is killed or
subjected to punishment by male members of her family or even by the Khap
Panchayats. The lesbian or gay movements are attacked and any film or painting
portraying women’s liberty face arson and murderous attacks.
Even a celebration of the Valentine Day by girls is attacked
by the RSS and VHP who act as Talibans do in other countries. These
organisations have total disregard to equal rights to women in a democratic
society. They pose themselves to be the self-appointed custodians of their
culture and religious value system. At times they pose a threat to the
fundamental rights of the citizens of India and to the democratic values
of equality, liberty and fraternity.
The bitter truth is that our society is male-dominated and
this male chauvinism reflects itself in all the activities within the social
framework. This flaw in male consciousness is induced by his education,
religious practices and familial behaviour. The media highlighted only some
names and their utterances with a political bias against those Parties that
were not of their liking. But the fact is that this bias against women persists
in our society or even worldwide because the various cultures inherit the
religious thoughts of their sects and social setup based on the inherent evil
of inequality.
Most of the religions originated in those ages in which the
slavery system in one form or the other was prevalent and continued even after
the political changes or social revolutions that replaced the older system of
governance with the new system of political regime. The religions still play a
major role in the cultural behaviour of humankind. And what is the status of
women in various religions?
The religious bigots derive their strength from their
scriptures and sermons that pour in all the times into the ears of people
through various media and various Sadhus, Babas, Asarams, Ramdevs and their
Dharm Sansad. It is now clearly known to people as to how these Sadhus treat
women in society. Similar is the case with religious bigots among the Muslim
community.
Mulayam Singh who is supposed to be from the same clan of
Yadavas to which Lord Krishna belonged, defends the acts of rapist ‘boys’. Lord
Krishna himself degrades the status of women in his Bhagwatgita, and
says, “Women are thought to be untrustworthy and stupid, easily corrupted”
(1:40), and “a hindrance to men on the path to liberation.” (16:11- 12) Lord
Krishna also justifies the creation of four Castes saying that ‘he created the
caste system’, a philosophy that preaches inequality among human beings treating
Shudras badly.
The saint poet Tulsi Das whose ‘Ramayan’ is sung
every where in Hindi-Urdu region, follows the same teachings of the Lord
Krishna and goes further saying that ‘a drum, a rustic, a Shudra, an animal and
a woman, all these deserve beating.’ In another part of his epic poem he treats
women as ‘the storehouse of eight vices’. The Holy Quran too preaches
the same attitude treating women as ‘fields’ to be ploughed by men:“Women are
your fields: go, then, into your fields whence you please.” Quran 2:223,
‘The Cow,’ tr. Dawood, p. 34
“Men
have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other,
and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient.
They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from
whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and forsake them in beds apart, and
beat them.” Quran 4:34, ‘Women,’ tr. Dawood, p. 83
So,
it is no wonder if Hindu and Muslim leaders during their election campaign
explicitly air their views on gender questions. Are they the only ones who
arrogantly express their gender bias or it is a social malady enveloping the
whole male dominated society? Almost every day we hear the cases of sexual
harassment of women at their place of work. The temples of various deities, and
the temples of learning i.e. universities are various dens of such culprits and
even a Shankaracharya and a Vice Chancellor was found behaving at the same
level as the political leaders who are in the news now.
This
cultural lag is every day strengthened by the whole religious industry
including various TV channels through the sermons of professional Sadhus and
Sadhvies. These channels were given the freedom of expression, but that
constitutional right is, in reality, misused for spreading all sorts of
superstitions and falsehood. These channels create roadblocks to the path of
enlightenment. They hardly promote scientific temper that is a foundation of
building a modern civilised human society. But nobody cares. The fact is that
only the scientific temper and democratic culture may change the mind-set but
that will take a long time to be affective in future. There can be no post-poll
expectations. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News & Feature Alliance)
|