Events & Issues
New Delhi, 17 December 2012
Walmart Lobbying
FDI DEBATE FAR FROM OVER
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
India’s tryst with FDI in multi-brand
retail may well have been sealed, but the debate is far from over. With reports
of Walmart having spent $25 million (Rs 125 crores) since 2008 on its lobbying
activities, including issues related to “enhanced market access for investment
in India” and the Government bowing to the Opposition’s demand for a judicial
probe, the whole issue of opening up multi-brand retail so hurriedly and with
many stakeholders against it, has got a fresh impetus. Whether the Government
likes it or not, its arguments in favour require further scrutiny.
Reforms
are, no doubt, necessary at this juncture but there are more important areas in
education, housing, water and sanitation, insurance etc. where the focus should
have been. Moreover, questions have been raised by experts, and quite
justifiably, whether reforms in the retail sector would solve the deep and
intractable problems of the agricultural sector and help the poor as also the
small farmers and small traders.
The
problems in agriculture are well known. Around 53-55 per cent of the population
is engaged in agriculture and around 68 to 70 per cent still live in villages.
The earnings of the small farmers have been dwindling because of truncated land
holdings, inadequate water availability, lack of irrigation facilities, soil
pollution and other related factors. There are 92 million small and marginal
farmers with less than 2 hectares of land, whose productivity has been
declining or is stagnant.
There is
no guarantee that the multinationals will help these small farmers by building
storage facilities, help form cooperatives or solving the problems of
irrigation as there is no clear directive of the Government in this regard. It
may be mentioned here that cold storage is an area in which FDI was allowed but
none has come so far. Hundreds of crores of fruits and vegetables are lost
every year due to lack of refrigerated cold chains and these are urgently
needed. Only now there are expectations that when FDI in multi-brand retail has
been allowed, that some cold storages may come up.
The
retail giants have come to India
to cash in on the ever-growing retail sector which is worth $ 500 billion and
expected to reach one trillion dollars by the year 2020. The food sector retail
accounts for 70 per cent of Indian retail and organized retail’s share is
around 5 per cent. Share in clothing, apparel, home supplies retail has been
growing between 20 and 30 per cent per annum.
More than 44 million people are involved in retail. It is
not known from where the multinationals will source their products and the
pricing factor will be the deciding factor. Experts believe that giant retailers
are likely to source their goods from China, which is decidedly the
biggest and cheapest manufacturer in the world and has been successfully
replicating products in the most cost-effective manner.
Thus, it
is quite obvious that craftspeople, weavers, embroiders and the like, whose
main work is to supply products for the local retail market, could be rendered
jobless. In fact, the informal sector will be badly hit as the giant retailers
would like to source their products mostly from the organized sector. Even if 30 to 40 per cent is sourced from
Indian suppliers, 60 to 70 per cent will come from outside the country.
In big
metro cities, we are all familiar with the small retailers selling their
products on the pavements or in the make shift shops at various places in the colonies.
If the big retailers can offer the same price – even for ‘seconds’, the
consumer would be attracted to these big shops and these retailers would be
severely affected.
It is not
known whether the Government has taken into consideration all these factors,
specially the nature and functioning of the informal sector, and whether any
judicious and economic analysis of the benefits of FDI in retain has been
carried out. Moreover, one can easily question when there are so many
multi-brand retail outlets, what is the necessity for foreign ones?
On the
question of opening up employment opportunities, it is well-known that these
foreign retail outlets have very few sales girls/boys as everything is done by
machines. It is thus hard to believe that multi-brand retail will create 10
million jobs in the country, as is being forecast, even considering that slowly
and steadily retail outlets are set up in middle level towns.
Some
analysts have been talking of better technology, management and the need for a
modern, formal, tax paying sector. But they fail to realize that this
tax-paying sector will finish off small traders and their families. One can
easily question whether we have been capable of providing basic necessities such
as power, drinking water, and even health facilities to the villagers that we
talk of modernism. Does our health sector in the villages have modern
technology and proper management?
There are
also a section of urban economists and intellectuals who are talking about the
need for professionalism in the retail sector. One may question here how
professionalized are we in various sectors that we need to professionalize the
retail sector on priority basis. Does this not mean eliminating the informal
sector which serves the economically weaker sections and the middle income
groups, and which forms a mind-boggling over 70 per cent of the work force in
the country?
It is but
common sense that the giant multinationals are coming here to encash on the
retail market and the consideration is purely for profit, as is the thumb rule
for any business. Either this has not been understood by the Government or it
is willfully not interested to understand or simply accept this. In the name of
reforms or modernization, the Government should have treaded carefully and
taken along all stakeholders in the true sense of the word, and not gone by the
numbers it managed.
More
importantly, it should have given top priority to what is in the best interest
of the poor and weaker sections and not the MNCs. To say that it is up to the
States to decide whether to allow FDI in multi-brand retail or not is no
justification for going ahead with it. While the judicial probe will not go
into the merits of the decision, one hopes it does a thorough job and unravels
the incentives behind it. --INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|