Open Forum
New Delhi, 14 September 2012
Jal Satyagraha
NOVEL SOCIAL MOVEMENT
By Dr.S.Saraswathi
Former Director, ICSSR, New Delhi)
The nation
heaves a sigh of relief following the Madhya Pradesh Government finally ceding
to the Jal Satyagraha demands after
over two weeks. One, increasing the Omkareshwar Dam’s height and the affected
villagers being given land in return for land they lost in Ghogalgaon village in
Khandwa district.
It is
immaterial whether this is a victory for the Jal Satyagrahis, belated dawn of good sense by the concerned
authorities or a combination of both.
However, for development planners, it is a lesson that the awareness
level of the people is rising higher and higher daily, and they can no longer
be ignored.
Think. We have
elected Parliament and State Legislatures, two-three tier panchayat bodies and gram
sabhas, civil service, elaborate administrative apparatus, vibrant Party
system along-with a vigilant media. Resulting
in increasing all around awareness to what is going on.
Nonetheless, development
planning often comes into direct confrontation with the people at the
grassroots. In recent decades, construction of large dams and sharing of river water
have become matters of contentious politics not just in India, but globally.
In fact, transnational
social conflict has grown over some projects whereby management of these clashes
is one of the biggest challenges faced by many Governments vis-à-vis the process of development.
Arguably, environmentalists
consider construction of large dams as a form of violence against nature and
people. True, this might be an overstatement, but the trend today is towards
small projects like digging canals and building local reservoirs.
But, for the dam
building industry, social and environmental factors are not the primary
concerns in pushing their projects as financiers are more concerned with
investments and return.
In several
countries, reports of use of brutal state force to overcome people’s protest to
construction of dams abound. The World Commission on Dams estimates that 40-80
million people were relocated to make way for big dams often without adequate
compensation over a decade ago.
But as the Jal Satyagraha over the Omkareshwar Dam
shows, protests also pay dividends. Recall, the Narmada Bachao Movement started in 2004-06 when the dam was
constructed across the river Narmada by the
Madhya Pradesh Government to supply power to the State.
It is one of
the 30 big dams planned across the river which form a big complex of the Sardar
Sarovar Project. Wherein, all the major
dams ---- Maheshwar, Nar Sagar, Maan, Tawa, Bargi, Indira Sager etc have
witnessed people’s movements for safeguarding their rights under threat from
development.
Notably, the
independent National Campaign for People’s Right to Information found several
“indefensible” social, political and economic injustices to the Narmada Valley people on account of construction
of these mega projects. Endorsed, by a World Bank ecologist who identified 17
points of dispute between advocates of big dams and their critics.
Among these were
lack of transparency and participation as also involuntary resettlement which
are invariably part of dam-related conflicts in India.
Arguably, many
activists are not opponents of the idea of dam construction, but only want
transparency of projects’ details, participation of concerned people affected
by a project, proper assessment and verification of social costs and benefits.
Remember, the
1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development held at Rio
emphasised the concept of sustainable development. In one of its preparatory meetings held in Dublin, certain
principles were adopted, known as the Dublin Principles were regarding water
governance.
One of these
principles states: “Water development and management should be based on a
participatory approach, involving users, planners, and policy makers at all
levels.” Needless to say, this is clear
assertion of the rights of the local people, a right that nullifies the notion
of absolute rights of the State over natural resources.
Unfortunately,
in our country, affected local people including women have to go through an
ordeal of remaining under neck-deep water for 17 days to impress upon the
authorities the legitimacy of their rights and the need for quick reparation.
Why did it
need a battle of wits, for the Madhya Pradesh Government to announce the
reduction of the Omkareshwar Dam’s water level to 189 metres as demanded by the
people along-with distribution of land in return for the land they had lost on
11th September?
Undeniably, expanding
infrastructure is inevitable in developing nations. But, the pangs of
consequent resettlement can and must be reduced as the first and most important
step. Given that mass displacement has emerged as an unfailing companion of
development projects
There is no
gainsaying that development must have a human face. In fact, what is considered as “obsessive
concern for preserving the rights of the local people” on the part of the World
Commission on Dams which is not relished by India must be adopted immediately.
In fact, a maximum
number of non-violent Satyagraha as
the form of protest have taken place with regard to irrigation projects.
Opposition to increasing the height of Madhya Pradesh’s Indira Sagar Dam too witnessed
another Jal Satyagraha and the
protestors were pulled out of the water.
Presently,
protestors at Tamil Nadu’s Kudankulam nuclear plant have taken a leaf from
their counterparts in Madhya Pradesh and took recourse to a Jal Satyagraha by forming a human chain in
the sea water.
Clearly, this ‘water
therapy’ strategy is fast spreading in the New Social Movements. Whereby, these
agitations are definite indications of mass awakening, not just for compensation
and livelihood of their loss, but to stop the multifarious fallout of rapid
development. This cannot be ignored any
longer.
What next? As
considerable time is spent for preparations in all big projects, decision-making
procedures at the preparatory stage need to be revised to include consultations
with all stakeholders and provide for participation of affected people. Also, details of projects should be made
public.
In sum, more
than these, educating the people on all aspects of the projects are the need of
the hour. Particularly social and environmental issues, including public safety
and welfare that touch the people around, must form part of project
preparation.
Alas! In our
country, this most important task is pushed as the last item to taken up under compulsion
if and when protests against projects turn uncontrollable. ----- INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|