Political Diary
New Delhi, 21 July 2012
Mr Congress System
PRESIDENT PRANAB:
OLD WINE AGES BETTER
By Poonam I Kaushish
The old gives way to the new on Raisina Hill. Meet the
thirteenth President of India Pranab Mukherjee. A welcome change indeed!
How should one describe him? Mr Congress System who rose
from Rajya Sabha’s last bench to Number 2, from Prime Minister Indira Gandhi Cabinet
in 1973 till last month as erstwhile Union Finance Minister, making policy,
fire-fighting and striking deals. Pranabda
as he is affectionately called by colleagues or simply Poltu his pet name, who made it to the magnificent Rashtrapati
Bhawan. Vintage wine, getting better with each passing year!
A path-breaking journey for a teacher’s son from a West Bengal’s Mirati village, who taught before entering
politics. Exuding humility, sharp intellect and encyclopedic memory which
enabled him to win friends and influence politicians across the political
spectrum over the years. None know how India's Government functions at the
micro level better than him.
Readers are justified in wondering why I am ‘boring or
burdening’ them with Mukherjee instead of chat-patta
political torh-marorh of the latest NCP’s Sharad Pawar’s antics. Normally,
a new President does not evoke much public attention. Thanks to the perception
that the Head of State is merely the Government’s “rubber stamp and stooge”. Proved
true time and again.
However, call it destiny or a conspiracy of political
circumstances, Mukherjee’s ascendancy to the Presidency was preceded by high
drama, courtesy fellow Bengali and capricious Trinimool’s Chief Mamata
Bannerjee-Mulayam suggesting three alternates, Samajwadi’s U-turn and Mamata
coming around.
Arguably, given the political turbulence with NCP’s Sharad
Pawar now flexing his muscles, a fractured polity resulting in Parliament often
being deadlocked over issues it falls on President Mukherjee’s shoulders to steer
his Council of Ministers out of the mess. Add to this, no clear winner expected
in 2014 elections in 2014, his negotiating skills and wisdom will be put to
test to anoint a Prime Minister and steer the ship of the State.
Pertinently, contrary to popular perception, the President
is “not a ceremonial head, a rubber stamp or a glorified cipher”. As Head of
State he has a bigger role to play than hereditary monarchs. He has certain
reserve discretionary powers which flow from the oath of office whereunder he
undertakes to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution” to the best of
his ability in the service and well being of the people of the India. Also,
like the British monarch, he has “the right to be consulted, the right to warn
and the right to encourage”.
However, as 2012 is not the India of 1947 wherein democracy has
degenerated into a feudal power brokers’ oligarchy riven with communalism,
casteism and corruption, together with the collapse of the system, the
President’s role has become critical, if the nation is not to be hijacked from
its democratic and Constitutional path.
Mukherjee would be well advised to read the “unpublished
speech” of India’s
First President Rajendra Prasad at the inauguration of the Indian Law Institute
on 28 November 1960. Rajen Babu, as he was popularly called, questioned the
tendency to equate the President’s Constitutional position with that of the
British monarch and suggested an investigative study of the powers and
functions of the President by legal and constitutional experts.
He observed: “The Head of the State in the British
Constitution is a Monarch and the Crown descends according to the rules of
heredity. In India,
the Head of the State is an elected President who holds office for a term and
can be removed for misconduct in accordance with the procedure laid down in the
Constitution.” He also questioned the tendency to believe that like the British
sovereign, the Indian President was also a Constitutional Head and had to act
according to the advice of his Council of Ministers.
Said he, “The executive power of the Union is vested in the
President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers
subordinate to him in accordance with the Constitution. The Supreme Command of
the Defence forces of the Union is also vested
in him and the exercise thereof shall be regulated by law… there were also articles
which laid down “specific duties and functions of the President….”
In fact, Prasad, who had earlier presided over the
Constituent Assembly, took up the issue of the President’s powers with Nehru in
1950 soon after moving into Rashtrapati Bhavan. Nehru referred these points to
the then Attorney-General, M.C. Setalvad, and the latter opined that the
President could dismiss a ministry and order fresh elections on his own
discretion which could be exercised as a reserve power if the President felt
strongly that Parliament did not reflect the political balance in the country.
(Nine State Assemblies were dissolved in 1977 by the Janata Government
following the Lok Sabha poll earlier that year in exercise of this power).
Much has happened since the first President put forward his
view. Originally, there was no provision in the Constitution which laid down
that “the President shall be bound to act in accordance with the advice of his
Council of Ministers”. But Indira Gandhi ill-advisedly rushed in with the Constitution
42nd Amendment: There shall be a Council
of Ministers with the Prime Minister at the head to aid and advise the
President who shall, in the exercise of his functions, act in accordance with
such advice.” Thus, tying-up the President hand and foot.
Subsequently, the Constitution 44th Amendment clarified that
the President was not tied hand and foot and that he can “require the Council
of Ministers to reconsider such advice either generally or otherwise.” But this
power is not unlimited. The amendment, introduced by the Janata Government,
provides that the “President shall act in accordance with the advice tendered
after such re-consideration.”
Importantly, most experts agree with Rajen Babu that the
President has certain reserve, discretionary powers which flow from the oath of
his office which is as follows: “I will faithfully execute the office of
President and will to the best of my
ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution….” The President also
has the “right to be consulted, the right to warn and the right to encourage.”
Notably, he has another power which, has seldom been
exercised. The power to question and the right to information. Among other
things, he could always exercise his judgment and ask for any decision to be
reconsidered by the Government Constitutionally, he could even go to Parliament
and also seek the opinion of the Supreme Court on any issue of basic
importance.
In sum, in these vexatious political times, Mukherjee, will
have to give all it takes to balance the ever-growing inherent contradictions
within our polity. Address basic questions vital to the healthy growth of India’s
democracy. He has a moral duty to perform when decisions are not taken in the
interest of the people. Recall Abraham Lincoln’s famous quote: Public opinion
is everything. With public sentiment nothing can fail. Without it, nothing can
succeed. Consequently, he who moulds public opinion goes deeper than he who
enacts statues or pronounces decision”----INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|