Economic Highlights
New
Delhi, 24 February 2012
Taxing Expenditure
ABSURD, WON’T RAISE KITTY
By Shivaji Sarkar
The income-tax department is one of a kind. It takes
one step forward and two backwards. Its decision to do away with filing of tax
returns up to Rs 5 lakh of income is welcome. However, it has come with a
retrograde step to tax supposed luxury expenditure by trying to redefine
wealth.
The move is extortive and would further stymie growth
of a sagging economy. Manufacturing sector, industry, services et al are
showing signs of stress and anxiety. The people are not having enough
disposable income i.e. spare money. High inflation, interest rates, tax
deduction on bank deposits coupled with job losses has robbed the markets of the
buyers.
In the midst of preparing the Union Budget, Finance
Minister Pranab Mukherjee would need to act to bring that confidence back to
the market if he wants revenue income to grow to meet his needs. Taxes should
be lubricating the economy instead of putting brakes on it. Sadly, the I-T
department is doing exactly this. Taxing expenditure was a favourite issue in
socialist economies. India
has given that up since 1991. A market driven economy requires buyers and that
means people must spend to contribute to the growth.
During the past three years just the reverse is
happening. People are spending less, paying more in terms of taxes. If the
factor of inflation is included they require at least 25 to 30 per cent relief
in their tax payments. This has not happened. If some of the cesses such as education
are included they are paying far more taxes.
At such a time the move to tax a purchase of Rs
50,000 for buying a watch or jewellery may appear aimed at the rich but in
reality it may send a shiver through all, as there would be a lingering fear
that the taxman is watching and thus the visits to the markets must be cut down.
More so, as nobody wants to be harassed. At the same time, the I-T department
says it would spend more on collecting information through random surveys by
enquiries on architects, interior decorators, antique dealers, imported watch
dealers and art galleries to collect the requisite information.
Indeed, it is one of the most unwise decisions. The
people who are into all these activities pay taxes. With some spare that they
have, they indulge in making purchases that help run many businesses. Some of
these like interior designing are at a nascent stage. Many shops have
specialised in selling imported watches for two reasons: one that India does not
specialise in watch making and two that one makes a statement with foreign
brands. Likewise, the Indian art market has just started developing. Though we
are not an international hub yet it has the potential to develop into one. But
such tughlaqi (autocratic) decisions would put all these
activities to nought.
Besides, there is a flip side too. The I-T department
makes much expenditure, which it should better avoid. The new move would give
I-T officers enough teeth to bite where they should not. The big question is: How
would the Government ensure that the provisions would not be used for ulterior
motives by these tax officials.
In fact, those spending such amounts on these
purchases would be less than one per cent of the three per cent of total
taxpayers. The move would drain the Finance Ministry on the one hand and
provide opportunities to the tax officials to harass people on the other.
The predicament of the Finance Minister is well understood.
He has to increase his revenue income. This requires steps that would give him
more money and also boost the industrial, manufacturing and other similar
activities. Higher such activities the higher would be his income from tax
earnings. Increasing production is certainly not the concern of the FM alone.
However, his one wrong step can throw a spanner in all genuine efforts.
Clearly, the Finance Minister has to devise a
benevolent affordable tax structure. His tax moves should ensure low product
prices, higher sales and boost production. However, he is doing just the
opposite. Despite introduction of VAT, products are taxed at many points making
the ultimate domestically produced goods expensive. This has put many
businesses out of steam. This again is a loss not only in terms of tax but also
drains the economy as more has to be spent on sick or not so healthy
industries.
Hence, the Finance Minister has to take a call on
this. He has to reduce rates and simplify procedures. Difficult procedures also
have a cost on economy and business operations. It also paves way for competing
foreign economies such as China
to penetrate the system through offering impractically lower prices for
products. This has put many small-scale units such as firecrackers, knife,
cutlery and scissors, toys, sports goods, watches, electrical and electronics
almost close down their activities. They cannot match the prices that China offers.
The country needs to create tariff barriers on all
such imports to create a level-playing field. On the other it has also to
ensure incentives for Indian small-scale and other manufacturers so that they
are in a position to compete and combat dumping. In fact the World Trade
Organisation has provisions to stop dumping and India should take a cue. It also
needs to take steps that are increasing cost of production. Various kinds of
taxes have made industrial activity difficult. This is not to argue that
industries should not pay taxes, but these need to be affordable.
The recent move to impose Rs 413 crore tax on Board
of Cricket Control of India on an assessed income of Rs 964 crore may make some
happy, but one must realise that if any activity has to pay almost 50 per cent
as taxes, it would be better to close it down rather than run it.
The tax rules have many gaping holes and this causes
difficulty and leads to arbitrary tax assessments, consequent litigations and
further drain on tax resources. Many appeals lying at I-T tribunals are
frivolous. If such files are closed the department would save more money than
it can really earn. Hopefully the Direct Tax Code has been further put off. It
has to be a simple code than a compendium of rules that are difficult to
implement.
Let us keep in mind that Indian business does not pay
I-T and excise alone. There are hosts of other taxes at State and local levels.
For example, road travel itself is being taxed through tolls and makes goods
more expensive.
Finance Minister has to have a thorough look at the
entire tax spectrum and not his own kitty alone so that it has rational
affordable basis, simple calculations and the tax system gives a boost to
domestic activities and checks undercutting by foreign products. It is not just
swadeshi but a survival mantra, a system
that would, if put in place, increase revenue earnings. Can the FM please
consider it? -- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|