Open Forum
19 November 2011, New
Delhi
Food Security
HOLISTIC APPROACH CRITICAL
Dr.S.Saraswathi
(Former Director, ICSSR, New
Delhi)
No country, including India, can
afford to be complacent when reports of starvation deaths, suicides by farmers,
and massive malnutrition make breaking news frequently. While the Government
proposes to bring the Food Security Bill this winter session of Parliament to
address these maladies, a holistic approach would have been more welcome.
The Food and Agriculture Organization
has been repeatedly issuing a warning of impending global hunger crisis that is
likely to affect more than one-sixth of the world population and endanger peace
and security. India
can boast of being recognized as one of the fastest growing economy, but at the
same time faces the prospect of developing as a hunger capital of the
world. The contrast is unbelievable and
even unknown to the fortunate few, but is real and demands immediate remedial
measures.
The World Food Summit held in 1996
defined food security by describing it as a situation when “all people at all times
have access to sufficient safe, nutritious food to maintain a healthy and
active life.” It has explained that the
concept of food security includes both physical and financial access to food
that can meet dietary needs as well as food preferences of the people.
The Summit set itself a target of halving hunger
by 2015. Between 1997 and 2009, over two lakh farm suicides have been recorded
in India. Five States comprising Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh,
Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, and Maharashtra earned a name as “suicide belt” of India as a vast
majority of farm suicides happened there. In the global hunger index, India’s rank is
67 among 87 countries leaving only 15 countries in a worse situation.
The Universal Declaration of Human
Rights (1948) to which India
is also a signatory recognizes the right to food as an inalienable right. The Supreme Court of India has stated that
the right to food is a fundamental requirement for the Right to Life guaranteed
under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Therefore, any law or action to provide food security must be viewed as
a measure towards enforcing a right and not an optional benevolent programme to
promote people’s welfare.
Hunger deaths are of two types – one
involuntary through famine and drought, and the other voluntary as in the case
of farmers’ suicides. Hunger is also
manifested apart from lack of food in various forms of privations and
deprivations like suicides of farmers, submission to labour exploitation,
bonded labour, child labour, begging, disease, violence, even crime and so on. None of these can appear if the country
really considers food security as an inalienable human right and a fundamental
right of every citizen. The Government
has to constantly remind itself of the Supreme Court’s position in this regard.
Food security is a very complex
developmental issue and its various components have been in the agenda of
national planning as separate issues since the 1950s. However, only in recent years, a
comprehensive approach to development is being evolved in which food production
and distribution form part. A holistic approach to food security scheme was
launched in Brazil
in 2003 known as “zero hunger campaign” to cover production, consumption,
storage, etc.
According to experts, food security,
must address three major issues, namely, food availability, access to food, and
use of food. The first is governed by food production adequate by quantity and
quality, the second by physical and financial ability to obtain food, and the
third by proper consumption in relation to nutritional needs. Food security
involves production and distribution in which storage and transport form
important part. It includes nutrition, hygiene, sanitation, water supply, and
healthy environment.
The Food Security Bill presently
approved by the Empowered Group of Ministers which will, after Cabinet’s
approval, go to Parliament has the following salient features: One, monthly
entitlement of 7 kg. foodgrains per head at Rs.3 per kg for rice, and Rs.2 per
kg for wheat, and Re.1 per kg for grains for 75% of rural households, and 50%
of urban households; two, minimum of 3 kg of foodgrains per head for general
category; three, Rs. 1,000 per month to pregnant and lactating mothers for 6
months; four legal right to take home ration/meal to women, children, special
groups including destitute, homeless, disaster affected persons, and persons
living in starvation.
The Bill proposes to introduce legal
entitlement to subsidized food, and to replace the existing categorization as
“below poverty line” and “above poverty line” with new groupings known as
“priority households” and “general category”.
It is still in a way targeted programme aiming to cover about 67% of the
population of the country.
A common grievance about this Bill is that it
fails to give the much-needed attention to nutritional standards. It continues
to view food supply as a separate social problem whereas it is not sufficient
to bring about a certain minimum standard of life. Raising the level of nutrition and the
standard of living and improving public health are considered among the primary
duties of the State in Article 47 of the Constitution.
With this realization, we may start
with guaranteed food supply. For, this will inevitably force the Government,
the corporate sector, and the people to deal with several other social-economic
problems which are causes and/or consequences of food deficiency but are
blatantly neglected at present.
One of these relates to diversion of
agricultural land to industrial purposes.
Whatever be the compulsions of globalization, the country cannot afford
to import essential food products and must aim to be self-sufficient. The
farmers’ sentimental attachment to land has economics behind it. Another problem is storage which has led to
criminal wastage of foodgrains and bitter remarks of the Supreme Court
recently. It is strange that governmental economics does not allow free
distribution of foodgrains but allows wastage and decay for want of proper
storage facilities.
True, insistence on a holistic
approach may delay even a beginning towards the idea of “food for all”. But,
preoccupation with food security should not result in food import, malnutrition,
unbalanced diet, etc. It seems that a certain amount of wider approach in the
matter should follow the first step of basic food security for all. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News ^ Feature Alliance)
|