Round The World
New Delhi, 31 July 2007
Political Upheaval
in Pakistan
By Dr. Chintamani
Mahapatra
School of International Studies, JNU
Pakistan today is in turmoil. Politics is in
utter confusion. Society is ablaze with rising number of terrorist attacks. The
North West Frontier Province
continues to be ungovernable. Islamabad’s
writ does not work there. It makes no difference who is at the helm of affairs,
the military or civilian leadership. The latest national intelligence estimate
of the US government has issued a warning on the resurfacing of Al Qaeda and
Taliban forces in Pakistan.
President Musharraf has more enemies today than ever before. The religious political parties
and groups have turned completely hostile to him after the Lal Masjid incident.
Earlier they were angry with him over his friendly overtures towards India, ignoring
the Kashmiris’ interests and withdrawing diplomatic and political support to
anti-India militant organsiations. Today, there is a widespread belief that he has
become Busharraf by taking direct orders from President Bush and tormenting,
arresting or killing Muslim brothers.
The so-called agreements Musharraf signed with tribal
leaders co-opting them in handling the Taliban and Al Qaeda threats along the
Afghan border have backfired. In fact, there have been more cases of
cross-border terrorism along the Pak-Afghan border since the signing of that
agreement.
President Musharraf’s plan to remove Justice Chaudhary
failed miserably as people across the board rose up in revolt. Now the Supreme
Court has re-instated justice Chaudhary.
In all this, the US of course maintained a studied
silence whenever President Musharraf resorted to anti-democratic means to continue
in power. But since it started becoming increasingly evident that Musharraf was
turning out to be an unpopular leader, the Bush administration began to mouth
the need for strengthening democracy in Pakistan.
It may be recalled that the rigged election of 2002, which enabled
Musharraf to showcase his democratic credentials, was quietly accepted by the US in view of his
importance in the war against terror. Washington
not only channeled billions of dollars of assistance
to bolster the sinking economy of Pakistan but also turned the
country into a major non-NATO ally. While Musharraf held sham elections and
described himself as President to crate an image of a transitional democratic
experiment, Bush officials were all praise for the supreme ruler of Pakistan.
Assistant
Secretary of State Richard Boucher often tells the US
legislators in Congressional
hearings how the State Department intends to support Pakistani efforts to
strengthen democratic institutions and points towards the ensuing elections in Pakistan in
October 2007.
However, in the US,
the attitude towards Islamabad
is taking an interesting turn. In the midst of intensifying political
complexity in Pakistan,
the Bush Administration has been putting the pressure
on Musharraf to deliver on his promises. The incessant
praise on him as a great frontline soldier in the fight against terrorism has
become a thing of the past. The lawmakers in the US Congress have begun to demand an account of the $10
billion invested in Pakistan
since September 2001. The White House has no option but to ask Musharraf to
enhance his performance in capturing or killing the Al Qaeda operatives.
At one point, the ‘helpless’ Pakistani President put up a brave
face and retorted that he had done whatever was possible.
He is aware that the performance of the coalition forces in Afghanistan and Iraq in confronting terrorist
groups is no better. But at the same time, he is aware of his own
vulnerabilities.
Once out of power, Musharraf’s position could become
precarious. No one but the Americans will be able to secure his life. The US has provided
safe habitat to departing dictators friendly to it. Two assassination attempts, increasing hostility with the
Islamic groups, growing strength of the Taliban and the Al Qaeda in the country
and an increase in terror attacks in cities are indicators that Pakistan’s
political power is eroding fast.
It is in this backdrop, that President Musharraf has
extended his hand to former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. Pakistani
politicians and leaders are notoriously capable of smiling and dining with the
enemies. The recent meetings between Musharaf and Bhutto thus need not raise
eyebrows. By one stroke, Musharraf has been able to neutralize former Prime
Minister Nawaz Sharif. The latter was reportedly trying to make common cause
with Benazir to return to active politics in Pakistan and put up a joint front
against the current military regime.
While this development appears to be a smart move by Musharraf,
it is thoroughly enigmatic. How can Benazir help him protect his position and
political power? What can he give to her in return? Even if elected to the
National Assembly, Benazir cannot
become the Prime Minister, under the present Constitution, since she has
already twice served in that post. Which position can be offered to her without
amending the Constitution?
Benazir, on the other hand, has indicated that she could
support Musharraf who would have stepped down from his office as the Army
Chief. Will she settle down for low price in terms of dropping of all charges
against her and her family members? Can that be a credible bargain?
Behind-the-scene details of the political deal between
Benazir and Musharraf are unknown. Speculation too is difficult. However, there
are reports that the US
and some of its European allies support this latest move. In the hope that a
marriage of convenience between the civilian and military leaders would be of
great help in keeping the Islamic extremists at bay.
Many questions, however, remain answered. Will Nawaz Sharif
keep quiet when Benazir and Musharraf team up? Won’t the Islamic extremists see
this move as a ganging up against them and step up violent acts? One thing
seems to be clear. Whether the latest deal making succeeds or fails, it would
prevent Nawaz Sharif and Benazir Bhutto from coming together against the
military regime. The trust deficit between these two civilian leaders has
already increased. Pakistan is clearly
in for a prolonged period of uncertainty, confusion and upheaval.--- INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|