Events & Issues
New
Delhi, 10 October 2011
Radicalisation of Youth
NO HALF-HEARTED SOLUTIONS
Dr. S.Saraswathi
(Former Director, ICSSR, New
Delhi)
The National Integration Council
(NIC), which meets occasionally, was convened last month primarily to assess
the sense of the Council on the controversial Bill to check communal violence.
In the deliberations, the issue of radicalization of youth was also taken up as
a serious problem that needs to be urgently addressed.
Indeed, this problem of youth activism
has occurred as a domestic problem on a massive scale in many countries, both affluent
and poor, developed and developing, at some point in the second half of the
last century. Student and youth revolts in the US,
Germany, Japan, Indonesia,
and China
have brought about crucial social-political changes. Its global escalation
threatening peace and security is part of international terrorism in recent
decades.
The term ‘radicalism’ in common
parlance is associated with violence and direct action. The dictionary definition gives its meaning
as ‘going to the root’, that is, ‘primary’, or ‘fundamental’. In politics, it
refers to political orientation of those who favour revolutionary change in
government and society. For students of politics, the term is a reminder of the
most radical element of the French Revolution witnessed in ‘Jacobinism’ that
ushered in the Reign of Terror.
Today, when we speak of youth
radicalism in India,
we are concerned with radical ideals – extremism and fundamentalism - and not
civil rights or democracy that provoked the youth in the countries mentioned
above. Radicalism is pictured as a violent collision between groups of
different persuasions or affiliations that have no meeting ground, and clashes
between the radical group identified by others as such and the government
having legal authority to suppress opposition. Further, radicalism is in our
mindset associated with terrorism that takes the fight against opponents and
the authority supporting the status quo to innocent people who take no sides.
Youth population (13-35 years of age
as recognised by the Government of India) constitutes over 40 per cent of the
total population of India,
and is clearly significant by size. It is a finding from several studies abroad
that there is a danger of eruption of violence and terrorism in countries with
bulging youth population and glaring inequalities in the society. Wide
disparities in income and economic standards, and unequal opportunities for
social-economic progress intensify suffering and make the young angry. A large
youth population feeling alienated and marginalised is likely to develop a
peculiar class consciousness and tend to cultivate separatist feelings.
Terrorist operations in several
places are reported to be carried out by young men trained for the
purpose. They are found staunch
supporters of their cause and their methods and found unrepenting if caught.
Well trained and willing to take risks, substantial number of suicide squads in
some militant groups like the LTTE are said to be young. Maoist and Naxalite
ideas in India
have an appeal for disgruntled youth.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has
stated in the NIC meeting that problems of terrorism and left wing extremism
constitute two major challenges that our society and polity face today, and
that in tackling this, education and skill development have a major role to
play. His contention is that lack of
productive employment opportunities for our young men and women is a factor
which aids radicalism. Home Minister P C Chidambaram speaks of radicalisation
of Muslim youth and ‘extremist right wing organisations’ in the same tone as
parallels. The Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Sushma Swaraj has in the
same meeting hinted at lack of political will in containing the menace.
Candidly, all these observations
appear superfluous taking the country nowhere near finding a solution to youth
discontent and consequent unrest. There are instances of poverty breeding
violence; there are also cases of highly educated, skilled and upper class
youth indulging in cyber crimes and specialising in the use of sophisticated
appliances that help extremist activities. Land grab politics and eviction of
tribals from their habitats for development projects have led to mass uprising
of the deprived; so also, student groups desperately fight for ethnic and
linguistic rights and seek political solution by non-parliamentary methods.
Radicalisation of youth is
facilitated by rapid and sophisticated communication network. Ideologies and
doctrines are carried anywhere in no time and this helps rapid escalation of
movements and protests. Radicalism is no
longer confined to the poor and suppressed and the unemployed, but has spread above
in the social ladder.
Many believe that development is the
remedy to curb youth violence. But, unless the fruits of development reach all,
it will only aggravate the sense of deprivation and injustice, and intensify
protests against development projects. This brings to the fore the importance
of humanizing development.
Economic development is only one
aspect of human development.
Comprehensive development and ‘development for all’ cannot be measured
by GDP growth or by budget allocations and expenditure statements of the
government. Productive employment repeatedly asserted by planners is not
sufficient; it should alter the basic socio-economic structure of the country.
In most cases of youth revolt -
whether in the North-East or in Andhra Pradesh, whether they are project
displaced people or victims of industrialisation and urbanisation, protesters
fight against a system under which they are unable to get what they think is
due to them. To fight this situation,
they tend to seek strength from parochial identities as well as sentiments. It
is a fight for social space.
The problem of youth radicalisation
is complex and needs to be addressed with a multidimensional approach from
social, political, economic, and psychological angles. Half-hearted solutions
will not work. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|