Defence Notes
New Delhi, 20 September 2010
Controversies Over AFSA
THREAD WITH CAUTION
By 10:29AM
The Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) and the all-Party meeting held
on 15 September in New Delhi was unable to take a decision on diluting the
Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) in Jammu and Kashmir due to lack of
consensus. Which continues to elude the Centre.
The Defence Ministry, Armed Forces and the BJP were opposed to any move for
diluting the AFSPA as it could hamper the morale and operational capability of
the Forces. And wanted the UPA Government to integrate J&K with India rather
than play into the hands of Pakistan-sponsored separatists.
Further, BJP’s senior leader Advani accused the Centre of “bending over
backwards” to placate the secessionists in the Valley. “There is continuing
talk of diluting the AFSPA and withdrawal of the forces. This is nothing but
surrender before Islamabad's strategy of
breaking India's
post-1947 unity,” said he.
“This is what the military rulers of Pakistan
have been dreaming of ever since their defeat in Bangladesh's War of Liberation in
1971. It is a shameful irony that if one Congress Prime Minister was
responsible for India's historic victory in that war, another Congress-led Government
is working towards India's surrender to
Pakistan's proxy war in Kashmir,” Advani added. He underscored what Nehru had told
Parliament decades ago, “Article 370 is a purely temporary provision,” but the
UPA Government was “bending over backwards to placate the secessionists.”
Significantly, the demand that the Act be withdrawn has been rising from
Kashmir to the North East. The 1958 AFSPA Act
is in force in parts of Arunachal
Pradesh, Assam,
Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura. The Act was extended to Jammu and Kashmir in 1990 and is currently enforce in 12
districts including Srinagar,
Budgam and Gandherbal. The ruling National Conference wants it lifted to bring
normalcy in the State.
Many in South Block warn that a partial withdrawal could tie the hands
of the Forces dealing with infiltration in J-K and trigger similar demands from
the North East. A possible way out could be to amend the Disturbed Areas Act
that provides legal cover to paramilitary and state police personnel engaged in
anti-insurgency operations. Even as the future of the Act is being debated, the
Army's reservations have been in the public domain.
As per the report submitted to the Central Government as early as June
2005 by the Committee headed by Justice Jeevan Reddy, the Act had become “a
symbol of oppression, an object of hate and an instrument of discrimination and
highhandedness”.
Holding that “the Act is too sketchy, too bald and quite inadequate in
several particulars”, the Committee was of “the firm view” that it should be
repealed. It recommended the addition of a new chapter in the Unlawful
Activities (Prevention) Act to deal with disturbed conditions in a State,
removing the harsh features of the AFSPA”.
Speaking in Imphal on 2 December 2006, 18 months after the Committee
handed its report, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh promised to make AFSPA “humane,
giving due regard to the protection of basic human rights” to which end, he averred,
the Home Ministry was working on the amendments to the Act by way of “modifying
the existing provisions or inserting new ones”'
Needless to say, the Prime Minister and the Home Ministry owe an
explanation to the people of this country why they indulge in soft talk without
consulting with other national Parties especially when the country’s integrity
and sovereignty is involved. By their dilatoriness, they have directly
contributed to the raging conflagration of horrendous proportions in the Kashmir Valley, leading to the loss of a number
of lives, including those of young boys and girls.
The Jeevan Reddy Committee gave an honourable exit. By December 2005,
within six months of the submission of its report, the Government could have
examined the various implications and come up with built-in provisions for
safeguarding human rights. It would have, thereby created an enormous fund of
goodwill.
Instead, by painting itself into a corner and seeming to succumb to
violence, the Government is only laying itself open to the charge of being
stone-deaf to people's sentiments unless they resort to near rebellion and
force its hands. It also becomes answerable to all the tragic happenings of the
last six years, with their terrible human cost.
In view of the gravest threat to security, the provisions of the AFSPA
are not at all draconian. All that is necessary for a part of the State to be
handed over to the Armed Forces is for the Governor or the Central Government
to notify these areas as in a “disturbed and dangerous” condition.
Thereafter, the Armed Forces are free, on the suspicion of violation of
the law or commission of an offence, to fire upon or otherwise use force,
against terrorists. They can also without any warrant, arrest any person and
enter and search any premises. No prosecution of anyone indulging in excesses
purporting to acts under AFSPA is possible except with the previous sanction of
the Government. This is one of the reasons that the defence Forces are
effective in curbing secessionist activities both in the North East and
J&K.
Clearly, the outcome of the CCS and all-Party meeting suggest that the
Prime Minister and the Defence Minister cannot muster the will to overrule the
strong insistence by the Armed Forces on the retention of this statutory shield
which it regards vital for its effectiveness. But they should not be blind to
the writing on the wall: The status quo cannot continue and the issue has to be
clinched.
If the Government shows softness by withdrawing AFSPA in J&K the
separatists and Pakistan
sponsored ‘proxy war’ secessionists will celebrate a big victory in the battle
they have been waging against the nation with the help of India’s foes.
Thus the ‘peace’ this abject surrender might bring would be a prelude to
another offensive for Azadi which might be timed to coincide with US
President Barack Obama's November visit. This risk the country cannot take at
this stage. ____ INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|