Home arrow Archives arrow Round the States arrow Round The States - 2010 arrow CM Queers The Pitch:KASHMIR SITUATION WORSENS, by Insaf, 8 July, 2010
 
Home
News and Features
INFA Digest
Parliament Spotlight
Dossiers
Publications
Journalism Awards
Archives
RSS
 
 
 
 
 
 
CM Queers The Pitch:KASHMIR SITUATION WORSENS, by Insaf, 8 July, 2010 Print E-mail

Round The States

New Delhi, 8 July 2010


CM Queers The Pitch


KASHMIR SITUATION WORSENS

 

By Insaf

 

Kashmir is menacingly becoming too hot to handle for both the State and Central Governments. For the first time in over a decade, the Army was called out on Wednesday last, to restore semblance of order in the Valley, stricken by violent protests and riots for the past one month. A nagging fear is that the Valley may slip back into the 90s, when pro-azadi movement was at its peak. However, the Cabinet Committee on Security which met in Delhi following calls from Chief Minister Omar Abdullah to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Union Home Minister P Chidmabaram, decided the Army should stage flag marches in Srinagar and be kept out of towns and populated areas. It left it to the civil administration to deal with the situation and to decide when and where it wanted the troops deployed. The Ministry of Defence too has made it clear that it wants the Army deployed for the shortest possible period. On its part, a dazed State government continues to impose curfews in entire Srinagar and separatists’ stronghold towns of Sopore and Baramulla. Unfortunately, the media too has come under attack. Curfew passes have been withdrawn for the first time ever.   

 

Meanwhile, Omar Abdullah has ill-advisedly queered the pitch and added fuel to the fire by stating the other day: “The aspirations of the people of Jammu & Kashmir cannot be assuaged only by development, good governance and economic packages but need a political solution”.  Pleading the case for more autonomy, the Chief Minister added: “But I am not averse to move beyond it, if there is a solution other than autonomy that is acceptable to both India and Pakistan and meets the aspirations of the people of Jammu & Kashmir”. Whether he is extending tacit support for the Opposition PDP’s espousal of “dual sovereignty” involving India and Pakistan is unclear. What is significant, however, is that the CM has challenged the belief mouthed by many well-meaning Indian liberals that a long dose of good governance could bring an alienated Kashmir Valley and its people back to the constitutional mainstream. Leading analysts have pointed out that the significance of this assertion should not be under-estimated. Not least because it loosely corresponds to the position taken by some of the ‘moderate’ sections of the Hurriyat Conference!

*                                               *                                               *                                        *

 

Big Relief for Karnataka                    

 

Hope is not all lost for Karnataka and importantly for the country in its battle against corruption. After 11 days of suspense whether he would or not, the State’s Lokayukta, N Santosh Hegde finally withdrew his resignation on Saturday last conceding to the request of senior BJP leader L K Advani. Speaking to the media after a visit by Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa and the BJP President Nitin Gadkari, Hegde said: “Advani is like a father. He was a close friend of my father (former Lok Sabha Speaker KS Hegde). I cannot go against his wish.” At the same time, Yeddyurappa assured him “all cooperation to fight corruption,” thus making amends and saving the BJP a national embarrassment. Hegde had resigned on June 23, peeved by the constant “neglect” shown by the BJP-led Government to the authority of the Lokayukta. His was the first case in the country where a Lokayukta had quit blaming the Government.

 

Sadly, the Lokayukta institution exists in only 17 States and even among these there is no common legislation. In an interview to a daily, Union Law Minister Veerappa Moily has opined that the Lokayukta be accorded a constitutional status to safeguard the institution from the “whims and fancies of the State Government.” Accordingly, he should be vested with the powers to prosecute bureaucrats and politicians and the Centre was considering a collegium to appoint the Lokayukta, who will be a retired Supreme Court judge “with an impeccable track record.” However, this apart, a section of the judiciary feels the Lokayukta requires an efficient and effective infrastructure. He should be able to handpick his officers and have offices in every district. If the institution has to function meaningfully then it must have an independent budget. Above all, the Hegde episode has also put the spotlight on the Centre’s half-hearted fight against corruption. Successive governments have failed to legislate for the appointment of the Lok Pal at the Centre even after four decades since a bill was first introduced as far back as 1968.   

*                                               *                                               *                                        *

 

Maharashtra Is Livid

 

Maharashtra is livid against the UPA Government at the Centre for having let it down badly in its decades-old dispute with Karnataka in the Supreme Court over Belgaum. New Delhi has opposed Maharashtra’s application of 2004 in the Apex Court challenging the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the State’s Reorganisation Commission Act 1956 and the Bombay Reorganisation Act of 1960. It has told the Supreme Court that Belgaum, where the majority population speaks Marathi, should stay with Karnataka as Maharashtra’s claim over it has no merit. The dispute has caused considerable tension between the two States. In 2006, the then ruling coalition of Karnataka, led by HD Kumaraswamy, son of HD Deve Gowda, even held a special session of the State Assembly in Belgaum, provoking Maharashtra to move an application in the Supreme Court seeking imposition of Central rule in the State. The Centre has stated that “the language of the people has been one criteria but not the sole criteria for inclusion of any area in a State.”

*                                               *                                               *                                        *

 

Trouble in AP Congress

 

Trouble appears to be brewing for the Congress in Andhra Pradesh. Its young MP, Y S Jaganmohan Reddy, son of the late YSR started his Odarpu yatra on Wednesday last, his father’s birth anniversary, much to the chagrin of the party High Command.  This follows his inability to get the requisite go ahead from the party President Sonia Gandhi, whom he met last week in New Delhi along with his mother. In a letter in his paper Sakshi, Jagnamohan wrote it was his “moral responsibility” to finish the yatra, to console the family members of those who had committed suicide following YSR’s death. In fact, the MP from Kadapa has even ridiculed the party’s suggestion that he gather all families at one place and meet them by stating: “When my father died Sonia Gandhi flew down to console me and my family instead of asking us to come to Delhi.” So far, the Congress is unsure how to deal with the situation. At best, Chief Minister K Rosaiah has warned party ministers, MPs, MLAs and MLCs not to participate in the yatra, which will be closely watched.   

*                                               *                                               *                                        *

 

Bandh In Opposition States 

 

Opposition-ruled States have finally brought the nagging price rise issue into sharp focus.  Importantly, the Bharat bandh called on Monday last also wittingly or unwittingly may help the Opposition parties bury their ideological and political differences for a larger cause. While the CPM sought to distance itself from the BJP and insist that there was no coordination for the bandh, facts suggest otherwise. Left-ruled West Bengal and Kerala were literally shut down, and in NDA-ruled Bihar, Gujarat, Orissa, Punjab, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh and Himachal Pradesh normal life too was disrupted. As expected, the call had no major impact in UPA-ruled Andhra, Tamil Nadu and Haryana, but the Shiv Sena and the BJP did manage a good response in Congress-NCP ruled Maharashtra. While industry outfits have given different figures ( Rs 3000 crore to Rs 300 crore) on the financial loss suffered by the country, the big question before the common man is  whether it will make the UPA government sit up and roll back prices? ---INFA

 

(Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)

 

 

 

< Previous   Next >
 
   
     
 
 
  Mambo powered by Best-IT