Events & Issues
New Delhi, 6 April 2010
Poll Law In Myanmar
YET ANOTHER SHAM
EXERCISE?
By Syed Ali Mujtaba
The scene is finally set for the holding of the long-awaited
2010 elections in Myanmar,
with the announcement of the Political Parties Registration Bylaw. While some
groups are registering parties, many existing opposition parties remain
undecided.
The parties neither have the leisure of debating the
legality of the Constitution nor the electoral laws since they have to register
within 60 days of the announcement of the Bylaw. Therefore, any decisions will
need to be taken quickly if they want to compete, and at the same time, the
parties would need to focus on what will constitute their election manifestos.
At least seven political groups are now preparing to
register with the Election Commission. These include: the National Unity Party
(NUP) formerly the Burmese Socialist Programme Party, the Democratic Party
(DPM), the Union of Myanmar National Political Force, the 88 Generation
Students Union of Myanmar, the Union Solidarity and Development Association
(USDA), backed by the SPDC.
The government-backed USDA and some of its allied parties
have been allowed to campaign extensively for over a year, much prior to the
promulgation of the election laws. It is learnt that a prominent Shan political
leader, Shwe Ohn is also planning to contest the elections.
The Kachin State Progressive Party (KSPP) led by Dr Manam
Tuja, former leader of the Kachin Independence Organization (KIO) is entering
the electoral fray with the requisite 15 Central Committee members and a
minimum of 500 party members in the State. The party is now preparing to
register itself within the 60 days and its leaders have promised to work for
the progress and development of education, health and the social status of the Kachin
nationals.
The Democratic Party-Myanmar (DPM) headed by veteran
politician U Thu Wai along with few alliance partners is gearing up to contest
the forthcoming elections, thanks to this new byelaw. Though it has been working
towards forming a political party since the last year-end to join the electoral
fray, it couldn’t do so officially till this recent announcement.
A group of Chin politicians are now preparing to participate
in the general elections. It maybe recalled that in the 1990 elections, Chin
State was divided into 13 constituencies and the Chin National League for
Democracy (CNLD) won four seats, Zomi
National Congress (ZNC) won two seats,
Mara People’s Party and the National
United Party won one seat each and the National League of Democracy won four
seats in Parliament. However, as part of a crack-down by the regime on
politicians and parties, many parties including the CNLD, the ZNC and the Mara
People’s Party-(MPP) were banned. Now
Chin political activists want a new party to contest the election, which can
include all politicians in the various townships in the State.
Similarly, several prominent Karen nationals are reportedly
busy forming political parties to contest this year's general election, while
others are preparing to stand individually. Three Karen political parties were
formed at the time of the 1990 elections: the Karen State Nationals
Organization (KSNO), the Union Karen League, and the Karen National Congress
for Democracy. The KSNO won in one constituency while the National League for
Democracy (NLD) won in 10 of the 14 constituencies in the State.
The ruling Junta has issued the white ID cards used for
foreign nationals to enable the Muslim communities in the northern Arakan State
to vote in the elections. However, it’s likely that the Muslim communities in
Maungdaw and Buthidaung may vote for their Muslim leaders instead of the junta
associates. This is due to their dislike of the regime and the oppression and
discrimination of Muslims in the country.
However, Myanmar’s
biggest Opposition party, the National League for Democracy (NLD) has announced
that it would not register for the 2010 election. It is of the opinion that the
election laws are unfair and unjust. Therefore, this means that Nobel Peace
laureate Aung San Suu Kyi’s party will have no role in the military-led
political process.
The NLD is angered by the military junta’s restrictive
election laws, which bar current and former prisoners from taking part in the
process. Many NLD members are among the 2,100 political detainees in Myanmar, the
most famous being Aang San Suu Kyi. However, the party faces dissolution if it
refuses to register. Recall, that the NLD had won the last election in 1990 by
a landslide but was never allowed to rule.
Similarly, some of the Kachin, Chin and Karen nationals have
taken the decision not to take part in the election. This will allow the ruling
SPDC to disband them or take whatever necessary steps against them. However, if
the SPDC miscalculates and the ethnic ceasefire groups fight back and the
fighting intensifies, the SPDC may change its game plan and use instability as
a pretext to postpone elections indefinitely.
The election in Myanmar has been widely dismissed
as unfair. This is because while electoral laws provide for a relatively ‘free’
vote on voting day with representatives of political parties present at the
polling station, the extensive powers given to the Election Commission
effectively nullifies that ‘freedom’.
In other words, the Election Commission will pre-screen
political parties and candidates that will be allowed to run. Only those who
are not deemed ‘dangerous’ to the SPDC will be allowed to proceed to the voting
stage. At that point, the people will be ‘free’ to choose between the SPDC
candidates and those who are friendly to the regime.
Once again these measures expose the well-orchestrated
strategies of the regime and its determination to shape the outcome of the
elections. The political parties and the candidates that want to compete and
represent their constituencies will have to come up with strategies that will
not disqualify them prior to the voting day.
The reluctance of the opposition and the ethnic parties, to
participate in the elections suggest it’s a sham electoral process orchestrated
by an oppressive military regime that’s in power for nearly three decades. Additionally,
it reflects that Myanmar’s national reconciliation process leading to
democratization of the country could not be achieved without the participation
of all the ethnic groups and political parties. Obviously, hinting that all is
not well with this new election law in Myanmar. ---- INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|