OPEN FORUM
New Delhi, 6 September 2006
Problem Of
Ferocious Types
Infiltrators
and Illegal Immigrants
By Bobby Srinivas
Infiltrators and illegal immigrants have become common
newspaper headlines these days. What is
the difference in taxonomy? When we talk
of infiltrators, our thoughts go to the marauders who surreptitiously enter India with their sinister motives, particularly
in Kashmir and north-east India. The Mumbai bomb blasts, the Indian Airlines
hijacks and other deadly activities are all traced to these infiltrators. Surely they could not be very legal!
The violence that plagued the people of the Punjab for well over two decades had the implementation
by these infiltrators with extra territorial instigation. Their sordid deeds in the Punjab were put to
an end by stern and ruthless action
of the Punjab police ably assisted by the Central authorities. But that has left a nightmarish memory for
the people of the State. That’s the
popular perception of what most of the infiltrators are! Many of the infiltrators are also immigrants
of a kind albeit illegal.
If it is any mitigation, we are not alone in the world with
such infiltrators. Even the powerful United States of America
faces the problem of infiltrators. They
are termed as illegal immigrants, steal most of the newspaper columns also. The
Wall Street Journal wrote sometime
back, “Young Americans are hitting Cancun’s beaches (resort on the east coast
of Mexico). Young Mexicans are hitting American borders!”
These young Mexicans are the illegal immigrants that seemingly cause such a
problem to the American authorities.
They have strong support in many quarters in America, mainly from
employers.
Most of the illegal immigrants are domestic servants,
workers in food manufacturing, furniture factory workers, labourers in
agriculture and construction work. In California alone these
immigrants represent around a third of the State’s labour force and 25% of its
residents! There is a strong lobby in America to help
these immigrants to find an honorable place as citizens and legally
rehabilitated. The pro-immigrant groups
or lobby claim these immigrants are not criminals and the US economy owes
much to them.
According to the National Academy of Sciences, the illegal
immigrants contribute more in taxes than they get back in service. The lobby describes them as undocumented
immigrants and resents the offensive term illegal. Even the American President George Bush is
soft on the issue and calls them
guest workers. The President is trying
hard to fit them somewhere. The
hardliners against the immigrants would want them to be categorized as felons
and treated as such. They should be
thrown out, never mind the impact on American economy!
Thus, there are two types of illegal immigrants – the benign
‘guest workers’ in the United States, who slog it out with poor compensation
and no benefits for the taxes they pay!
Indeed, these poor workers certainly pay their indirect taxes and
sometimes even direct taxes. Since they
are undocumented, i.e., illegal they are handicapped in demanding their just
dues. They also seem to have popular
support from employers and from households using them as domestic help. This is the American scene.
Then there is the other type, the malignant, dangerous and
ferocious ones---the illegal, unwelcome, unwanted guests---the infiltrators
that surreptitiously cross into India
particularly in the northern and eastern parts of the country. They play havoc with our civil population and
sometimes attack military establishments, particularly in J&K. They are well trained in various terror
training camps across the border and
have the blessings both from the
western and northern neighbors of our country!
The bomb blasts, bedlam and bloodshed that are frequently reported in the
media are just a sample menu of their final intention.
Besides these fierce infiltrators there are the passive ones mainly from Bangladesh
(previously East Pakistan) who are flooding Assam
and other eastern States, potentially overwhelming the local population. The locals have a fear of becoming a minority
in their own home. This has become a
core issue of much of the agitations
in the North-East, fanned and abetted by our hostile neighbors.
Mention may also be made of a large chunk of infiltrators
who come from Pakistan
with valid visas but do not return to their country. Not all of them come as terrorists. Many of them may be coming for a reunion with
their families who preferred to remain in India at the time of
Partition. And finding living conditions
better here, with no disabilities of linguistic or religious affiliation as
back home in Pakistan,
they get lost in the Indian multitude!
Time and again, local leaders in Mumbai claim that a large number of
infiltrators from Bangladesh
are comfortably ensconced in the city and in other parts of Maharashtra.
Unfortunately and unpatriotically these infiltrators are
useful to our unscrupulous politicians who consider them as free gift of vote
banks, never mind if they pose a danger to the security of the nation. Newspapers and citizens have repeatedly
focused on this growing menace. But
political parties who benefit from their voting advantage have soft pedaled the
issue. Unfortunately also whenever any government
wants to act tough with the infiltrators, human ‘rights’ activists and
political parties are up in arms giving these moles further lease of life.
One should also remember that prior to the independence of Bangladesh about ten million refugees from East
Pakistan, to escape the ruthless
military action of West Pakistan, had fled into India. One does not know how many of them have
really returned to their former homes.
That is the difference between infiltrators and illegal
immigrants. There is a paradox in the
American and Indian scene. The illegal
immigrants in the United
States pose no security risk to the
nation. On the contrary such immigrants
are a useful adjunct for their bouncing economy. Infiltrators in India pose a grave threat to the
peace and tranquility of this country.
They are a spoke in the wheel of our economic growth.
The other paradox is that in their anxiety to contain Soviet
sway in Afghanistan the United States
encouraged the Taliban and its terrorist outfits of intolerant
chauvinists. When the Soviets retreated America had no
use for the Taliban. Like the chicken
coming home to roost America
had the first sample of infiltrating terrorists with 9/11. In retaliation the U.S.
fiercely attacked Afghanistan. The retreating Taliban and allied terror
organizations sought other pastures to operate.
They turned their heat on India.
Unfortunately, it would appear that it may not be possible to repeat the Punjab
method of eliminating the infiltrators.
Their tentacles are far more widespread.
It is also feared these infiltrators may be having local anchors. We thus have, what appear to be, an insoluble
and an unending problem of infiltrators.
Like sayings that if you can’t beat them, join them – since we appear to be unwilling or incapable
of dislodging these unwanted population from our midst, we can only hope that
the future generations of these infiltrators will settle down to a peaceful
life and become a useful part of the nation!---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|