Political Diary
New Delhi, 7 November 2009
It Is Only A Song
MUSLIM ANTE ON VANDE MATRAM
By Poonam I Kaushish
A tempest in a teapot. That is the
sum total of the zero sum game over the needless hungama over Vande Mataram. Yet again. No matter that it ignited
patriotism, galvanised Indians to gang up against the British and throw out the
firangis and won India its
freedom.
Stirred by who else, but the widely
respected Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind (JUH)
which out of the blue issued a fatwa against
singing Vande Mataram. In a
resolution on the concluding day of the three-day conference at Deoband in UP
the Islamic clerics stated that singing the national song was anti-Islamic and
amounted to worshipping the motherland. This went against the concept of tawheed (oneness of God), according to
which a Muslim cannot supplicate to anyone except Allah. Besides, patriotism
didn't require singing Vande Mataram
in schools.
Arguably why now? A question that
has perplexed many given there was no immediate provocation and all was quiet. Why
a fatwa? Many shrug it off by
averring that opposition to Vande Mantara
taken from Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyaya’s 19th century Hindu nationalistic
novel, Anandamath, has a long
chequered history of reservation among certain Muslim groups and would continue
to be fodder for future debates Besides, the Supreme Court has indicated that
singing of the national song must not be made compulsory for all.
Not a few assert that the national
song is just another prop to celebrate the nation State and undue importance
mustn’t be given to it. Others aver that singing Vande Mataram must neither be made a test case of patriotism nor
should people be obstinate about not singing it. Notwithstanding, that it is
compulsorily played at the end of every session of Parliament.
However, some suggest there is some
method in this madness. The Muslims seem to be tilting towards the Congress given
the Party’s unexpected victory in 20 seats Lok Sabha seats from UP in the General
Elections. But with a rider. Fulfill our
demands, like implementation of the Sachar Committee report etc. Knowing that by doing so, it has put the
Party in a quandary. If the Congress concedes this, it could lose the upper-caste
Hindus vote-bank which is slowly returning to its fold. Thus, the safest bet
for the JUH is to raise the ante on an emotional issue to ignite the rabid Hindutwa brigade and leave the Grand dame with no option.
But with a rider. Fulfill our
demand, like the implementation of the Sachar Committee report. Knowing that if
the Congress concedes this, it could lose the upper-caste Hindus vote-bank
which too seems to be returning to its fold. Thus, the safest bet for the JUH
is to raise the ante on an emotional issue to ignite the rabid Hindutwa brigade, put the Party in a
quandary and leave it with no option.
In this context, it is pertinent to
understand how and why Vande Mataram came to be recognized as a national song
and why the Muslims consider it un-Islamic, full of hatred against Muslims and
offensive. Vande Mataram was written in 1875 and published in Chatterjee’s Anandamath in 1882. The story starts
with a group of sadhus who call
themselves santan, the children of Bharat Mata whose leader Satyanand is imprisoned by the Nawab. The sadhus vow to set their guru
free, shout that they would throw the Muslims into the river and set their
houses on fire. They not only succeed in freeing their guru but welcome British rule in India. In short, atrocities against
Muslims, is a recurrent theme in the novel.
When Bengal
is ravaged by the 1770 famine, the East India Company, forces the farmers to
cultivate cloth whitener instead of foodgrains as it is a big export earner. Triggering
an anti-British revolt wherein Vande
Mataram soon became the popular battle cry for freedom from British Raj. Large rallies all over the country
worked themselves to a feverish pitch by shouting Vande Mataram. Many were jailed and the song was banned. But it
failed to stop the patriotic fervour. Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore sang
it in 1896 at the Calcutta Congress Session and Lala Lajpat Rai started a
journal called Vande Mataram from Lahore.
The Congress formally adopted it as
a national song through a resolution at its Varanasi Session on September 7, 1905.
Thereafter, it became the opening note for all the Congress meetings and
sessions. Its powerful patriotic lines stirred the whole nation. Neta Subhash
Chandra Bose made it the Indian National Army's principal song and his
Singapore-based radio station regularly broadcast it.
In October 1937, some Muslim leaders
objected to Vande Mataram on the
ground that it contained verses that were in direct conflict with the beliefs
of Islam. True, the first two stanzas of the hymn eulogise Mother India and its
beautiful natural bounties with “hurrying streams, gleaming orchards…..” But
the fourth stanza of the song, for instance, addressed Mother India as,
"Thou art Durga, Lady and Queen,
with her hands that strike and her swords of sheen, Thou art Lakshmi lotus-throned…." It was
argued that by singing this, a Muslim was forced to equate his country with the
Hindu goddesses Durga and Lakshmi. This
went against the concept of Islam according to which a Muslim could not
supplicate to anyone except Allah.
Nehru understood his Muslims
brethrens’ religious predicament and soon worked out a compromise formula
through some fine balancing. Even as he underscored the hymn’s national
importance in the freedom struggle. The Congress Working Committee met in
Kolkata in 1937 under his Presidentship and adopted a resolution, whereby only
the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram
would be sung. Moreover, freedom was given to the organisers to sing any other
song of an unobjectionable character, in addition to, or in the place of, Vande Mataram.
Interestingly, while Vande Mataram was treated as India’s national anthem for long, Jana Gana Mana was chosen as the
national anthem of free India
following Independence.
The song was rejected on the ground that Muslims felt offended by its depiction
of the nation as "Ma Durga"—a
Hindu goddess— thus equating the nation with the Hindu conception of Shakti, divine feminine dynamic force. No
matter the Constituent Assembly on 24 January 1950 that Vande Mataram would enjoy “equal status” with Jana Gana Mana.
Over the decades Muslim animus towards
Vande Mataram has reared its head
time and again. In 1998, the NDA had to withdraw a circular by the then UP
Government making the recitation of Vande
Mataram compulsory. Ditto the case with the UPA in September 2006 when it’s
then HRD Minister Arjun Singh had to hurriedly retract his order to all the
State Governments making singing of Vande
Mataram compulsory in all schools on 7 September to mark completion of the
centenary celebrations commemorating adoption of the national song.
Either which way, the Islamic clergy
has to realize that in secular India
there is no place for fundamentalism, be it Hindu or Muslim. All our patriots.
At the same time the Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind
and its ilk have to realize that a regressive and orthodox social agenda that it
propagates (like anti- Women Reservation Bill, homosexuality, no TV et al) will
prevent the minority community from making full use of the windows of opportunities,
social cohesion and change offered by a democratic State. Instead it will present a fait accomplice and perfect foil to
parochial groups with vested agendas to play up the politics of victimhood and feather
their own nests. This has to be prevented at all costs.
Remember, India’s multi-pluralistic character,
pulsating democracy and civil society is neither rigid nor frozen in time. It
is constantly evolving. True, one song cannot make or mar the future of a
nation or its people. But Vande Mataram
is our national song and symbol of national pride, on par with Jana Gana Mana. It is high time we
stopped trivializing and trashing it. All secular minded Indians must
collectively thwart our beautiful and melodious national song Vande Mataram being turned behsura, in the hands of our political
drumbeaters! ----- INFA
(Copyright India News and Feature Alliance)
|