OPEN FORUM
New Delhi,
23 June 2006
Fresh Look Needed
CONTOURS OF DISASTER
By T D Jagadesan
India is a large country with all
types of terrain and climate. It has high altitude mountain areas, thickly
forested mountains, riverine areas, flat plain lands with heavily built metros,
deserts and long coastline. It is natural that at times some parts will face
natural calamities and disasters like floods and earthquakes. The Centre’s
recent Disaster Management Act ensures long-term rehabilitation of affected
people.
The country also has vast
resources in manpower – military, police and paramilitary forces, air and naval
forces, as well as number of NGOs. Additionally, it has a stable Government.
Despite all this, the earthquakes of Uttarkashi (Uttaranchal), Latur (Maharashtra), Bhuj (Gujarat)
and Jaipur (Rajasthan) are some incidents where thousands perished due to
delayed or inadequate rescue efforts. Many incidents of floods in Assam
and Orissa are testimony to
administrative bungling in bringing immediate relief. Even malpractices, siphoning
of funds are daily occurrences.
The latest is the devastating
earthquake in Jammu & Kashmir in October 2005. The extent of damage in Pakistan and
Pakistan-occupied Kashmir was proportionately
more than that on the Indian side. Even so, the scale of destruction here was
massive and required a concerted
rescue effort. What was witnessed
was a slow and indifferent approach. Surely, this was not due to lack of will
but lack of foresight, planning and execution.
There is an ongoing campaign to
malign the armed forces in Jammu & Kashmir by vested interests, backed by
the Hurriyat and other Pakistani agents. The disaster had presented an
opportunity to both the armed forces and security agencies to display their
benevolent side despite the fact that majority of the people, particularly in
border areas, don’t need any proof of their good intentions. They have
experienced it over the past 60 years or so.
But, those on Pakistan’s
payroll continue to manage to tarnish the image of the armed forces through
propaganda while operating against Jehadi Islamic terrorists. Thus, despite
heroic efforts by armed forces personnel, who plunged into rescue and relief
efforts, the full impact could not be felt owing to lack of foresight, bureaucratic
inertia and attempt by leaders to extract political mileage out of this
disaster.
It was declared that the
Government of India has created a Disaster Management Cell and a detailed plan
to meet challenges after the Tsunami disaster of December 2004. If such an
organization has really been created, no impact was visible in the quake-hit
Uri, Baramulla, Tanghdhar and Poonch sectors.
Basically, three types of
large-scale disasters can be foreseen, according to experts – fury of floods
with or without cyclones, earthquakes and Tsunami. It is not difficult to
visuliase the likely places of such disasters by studying natural conditions.
For example, earthquakes can strike anywhere, but areas lying in zones of high
seismic activity are particularly prone. By imagining the worst scenario, a
plan of action can be formulated. This will shorten the reaction time, which is
of utmost importance in rescue efforts.
After an earthquake, people
trapped under debris can be saved by using heavy earth movers. The same is used
in clearing roadblocks to enable large quantities of aid material to come
through. Such material includes tents, shelters, blankets, packaged food and
drinking water, first-aid and other medication. These should reach the victims
within six to 24 hours. Further delay would add to the death toll.
In the recent case, the extent
and intensity of the devastation was apparent within the first six hours. It
was fairly clear that a large quantities of tents would be required, which were
neither available locally nor with the Army in the State. These could have been
sourced from other parts in the country and airlifted to Srinagar and Jammu. Besides, food packets and warm
clothing could have been collected from industries in Jammu, Punjab
and Delhi. Medical
teams as well as medicines could have been made available.
A specific request could have
helped in mobilizing these resources within a short time. And tapping of all
these resources in a timely, coordinated and transparent manner could have given
a better account of our capabilities, But what transpired was far short of
expectations. The condition in remote villages was unbearable. Even if a few
tents and blankets could have been air-dropped with food and bandages it would
have been of great help as people in border areas are capable of erecting them
and distributing the resources themselves.
In the case of floods, there is
need for boats for rescue work, shelter for affected people, food, water and
medicines. The question is not of providing relief but mobilizing it within an
acceptable time-frame. This is the crux of disaster management. In various
earthquakes and flood-relief operations, the local administration becomes
ineffective as it becomes a victim in the calamity and is not available for
coordinating relief and rescue work.
A detailed plan, it will be
recalled, was prepared and presented by the Central Army Command to the civil
administration after the Latur and Uttarkashi earthquakes. But we still haven’t
learnt from the past. Even though we have experienced people, they do not find
a place in any disaster management cell at either the Central or State level.
It is managed by novices. However, the former Army Chief, Gen N C Vij (Retd)
has been named head of the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA). It should go a long way in relieving the
distress.
But disaster management entails
enormous resources. Co-ordination, storage, dispatch and distribution are
specialized jobs needing meticulous, sustained efforts. If done precisely,
these will go a long way in relieving disaster. Remember, tsunami relief
materials meant for the Andamans and Nicobar Islands
were rolling in some parts of the mainland long after the relief operationjs
were over. The earthquake disaster management in J & K had been hampered
not by lack of heart but by an absence of expert handling.
Thus, India must create an organization
with its headquarters in New Delhi
and centres in other parts of the country. And, the Union Ministry of Home
Affairs as envisaged in the Act must take care of resources such as heavy
earth-movers, tents, water tanks, pre-fabricated moveable shelters, boats,
blankets and minimum stock of essential
items. ---INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|