Open Forum
New Delhi, 19 May 2009
Post 2009 Election
ADDRESS CONCERNS OVER 123 PACT
By Dr MM Kapur
Come October
the 123 agreement will have been one year in operation with one patron in
altered historic onlooker role and the elections behind us. This leaves
the 123 without the hype and hoopla, a state that renders the treaty contents
and objectives easier to review. The two prime objectives (explicit and
implicit) were: One, a civilian nuclear cooperation, to ease the scarcity of
nuclear fuel for our existing and planned energy generation projects. Two, to
keep our strategic nuclear programme intact and outside the scrutiny of the IAEA
However,
the moot point is: The treaty’s aftermath risk load for the aam aadmi. It has been claimed that the
nuclear deal would benefit the common man. This was certainly just election rhetoric
and even the lay public has seen through this stratagem. The common man may get
a share of the energy generated after the needs of the industry and industrialists
have been met. But this may occur sometime in the distant future after all
others are replete, and only then will the aam aadmi receive attention in the form of rural electrification
Moreover,
whenever the deal leads to construction of nuclear plants, these are
likely to be located close to rural and urban populations. These units will no
doubt be secured, but the risk of pilferage of radioactive material
with exposure of unaware population, acts of sabotage and of terrorism will
remain, and will harm life and living space of the citizens.
The last
two risks have links to perceptions in the minds of sections of our
population leading them to conclude that these high value assets
are surrogate US targets. This is the result of the hype that
the Indo-US deal has received in the midst of a hostile environment
without any debate.
Tritium
released routinely and by accident in nuclear power generation, is an
additional risk for the population. There is no technology available to filter
this tritium which emits beta particles and can cause mutations/cancers. Tritium
has a half life of 12.3years.
Nuclear
plants also require water for cooling, thus these plants are built close to
water sources, and the warm water is released into the water source causing
damage to marine environment. This is bound to affect the livelihood of the
population, largely fishermen in that location. The life and security of the
population is impacted negatively, and in the existing scenario of
inadequacy of security and health care systems, there is urgent need to upgrade
these systems ahead of power generation. The upgrade must be able to meet this
additional load.
New Delhi has also to consider the signing of
the Convention of Supplementary Compensation, an international fund to cover
the affected aam aadmi in case of
accidental harm. The next question is of equity in 123. The 123 has led to an ease
in trading in nuclear fuel through the NSG waiver. This has been of value science
as we conserve our own reserves of fuel. Do we need the US for plant-building
science when they have minimum expertise in building, advanced design, maintenance
and safety issues? The US
may not be interested in these projects in the absence of a third party risk
cap in case of accidents saboteurs and acts of terrorism.
We may
not be interested in having them build plants in the light of the no stockpile
of fuel clause in the 123. The plant building plan would be aided by having
treaties with France, Russia and the UK, with the provision that we can
stockpile fuel for these plants to insure uninterrupted supply chain. These
efforts will take care of a 6-7% increase in energy generation. Further, the FBR
(fast breeder reactor) research using thorium should receive adequate resource
for further urgent development. These research facilities should be kept
outside the IAEA purview.
The right
to shift facilities from civilian to military lists (and the reverse) should be
with India.
This right is being exercised by the US for its own facilities. The strategic
nuclear programme requires computer simulation for maintenance of the arsenal
and development. This is the route to credible deterrence and that the treaty
should provide access to advanced technologies in this regard.
The 123
agreement needs to be examined in the light of India's Nuclear Doctrine of no
first use, and the need of maintaining a minimal deterrence. The need for
continual review is imperative because of the rapidly changing scenario in our
neighbourhood. A review and renew clause is thus critically needed.
The 123
agreement has been entered in great secrecy not as between two governments.
Recall that the Congress-led UPA government did not have some of its coalition
partners in favour of it. The debate in Parliament too and the manner of
obtaining votes left much to be desired. The political parties, the think
tanks, and the people need to be in the decision loop, despite the Congress’
performance this election. This needs a correction. In fact, a debate even at
this stage will remove all suspicion and may help produce resonance all around.
It is
well-known that our partner in the 123 agreement is a major debtor of China. It is
also likely that the US
in its war against terror in Afghanistan
will require Pakistan
as a partner for an indefinite period. Thus, in the light of the above concerns
it is time that we renew the 123 agreement to address these concerns and ensure
the objective of the agreement in clear terms, in this deep
global recession era. The negotiations will also aid our treaty partners,
the US
to appreciate our concerns at length. In effect, this aids the defining,
abiding and enduring of the treaty.
Self
reliance provides an excellent posture to obtain a symmetric deal. This posture
would be convincing if we could continue to build our power plants through the
Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) with funds raised through
Energy bonds open to Indians and the NRI's and other investors abroad in international
currencies.
This self-reliance
stance will be furthered if we provide support for research and product
development in this area of alternate renewable energy using manpower and
material from within the country itself. To complete this self reliant theme, it
would be wise for us to invest in mining, handling, and purifying our uranium
reserves and prospecting for new sites. The present reserves should keep us
going for our energy and strategic requirements for at least the next 40years.
--INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|