|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Open Forum
|
Politics of Summitry: BRICS COMES TO DELHI, By Dr. D.K. Giri, 11 September 2026 |
|
|
|
Round The World
New
Delhi, 11 September 2026
Politics
of Summitry
BRICS Comes to Delhi
By Dr. D.K.
Giri
(Prof of Practice,
Inst of Management Bhubaneshwar)
Summitry
is the highest form of diplomacy, and it’s most political. When Prime Minister
Narendra Modi hosts the 18th BRICS Summit at Bharat Mandapam on September
12-13, Delhi witnesses the classic logic of summitry that you and I have
discussed for years.
This
is the fourth time India chairs BRICS after 2012, 2016 and 2021, and this year
marks 20 years since BRIC was coined as a concept. The official theme India has
chosen is "Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and
Sustainability" with a Humanity First, people-centric pitch. What is the
significance of a summit? A summit is not just another meeting. It is a meeting
of principals. Foreign ministers negotiate commas; Heads of Government decide
destinies.
First,
it creates a deadline politics. For 350-odd meetings held across 25 Indian
cities during India's chairship, sherpas and sous-sherpas haggle over
paragraphs, but they know nothing moves until leaders arrive. A summit forces a
decision. Second, it is theatre for bilateralism. On the fringe of a
multilateral summit, leaders meet bilaterally without the burden of a formal
bilateral visit. Protocol is lighter, expectations lower, but optics higher.
A
handshake in Delhi tells the world that talking is still possible. It generates
a climate of confidence. You remember how in 2017, China and India pulled back
from the Doklam face-off just before the BRICS summit in Xiamen and the SCO?
The need to present a coherent communiqué made both bury the hatchet, at least
temporarily. Summitry does not resolve conflict, but it freezes it for
cooperation.
Third,
it is about communique management. To produce a joint declaration — Rio last
year had 126 paragraphs — leaders have to subsume bilateral tensions. For two
days, adversaries become colleagues. That is the unwritten rule of summitry. That
is why Delhi matters now.
How
is India using the summit to normalise relations? India is masterfully using
this BRICS chairship as a normalisation platform. Take China. If Xi Jinping
lands in Delhi, it will be his first India visit in seven years since
Mamallapuram in October 2019. After Galwan in 2020, ties froze.
What
changed? India and China have held intense back-channel work — the 25th round
of Special Representative talks between NSA Ajit Doval and Wang Yi in Beijing
on August 28, direct flights resumed, visas restored, Kailash Mansarovar
pilgrimage revived. Sources say Modi met Xi in Kazan in October 2024 and in
Tianjin for SCO in August 2025 to stabilise the Line of Actual Control. Over
50,000 troops still remain deployed. De-escalation is incomplete. BRICS gives
Modi and Xi a face-saving, multilateral umbrella to meet bilaterally and show
that economic decoupling has limits.
With
Russia, the dynamic is opposite — normalisation means reaffirmation. Putin is coming
to Delhi for the second time in less than a year after the December 2025 annual
summit. India has maintained defence and energy ties with Moscow despite
Western pressure, and the Kremlin has already indicated that 90% of
Russia-BRICS trade is now in national currencies and the issue of excess rupees
is being resolved. With the wider Global South, India is using BRICS to repeat
its G-20 trick.
Delhi
is expecting about 25 countries at leaders or senior level. Full members now
are 11: Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, UAE,
Indonesia and Saudi Arabia. Confirmed or expected are: Russian President
Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping with a delegation of 400
officials, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, South African President Cyril
Ramaphosa, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, Indonesian President
Prabowo Subianto, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, Kazakh President
Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, Malaysian PM Anwar Ibrahim, Thai PM Anutin Charnvirakul,
Ethiopian PM Abiy Ahmed, plus Cuba, Nigeria, Uzbekistan, and UN
Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. Brazil may send Foreign Minister Mauro
Vieira instead of Lula.
The
formal agenda is five-fold: resilient supply chains, trade and investment,
financial cooperation through New Development Bank and local currency lending,
innovation including digital public infrastructure and AI, and reform of global
governance — UN Security Council and IMF quota reforms.
The
real agenda, however, is delivery. As one analysis noted, this summit is less
about grand vision and more about whether BRICS can deliver practical
cooperation — payment systems that actually connect, NDB scaling to 30% local
currency loans, customs integration.
Thorny
issues are many: expansion vs coherence. First, after Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran,
UAE joined in 2024 and Indonesia in 2025, BRICS is heavier but less coherent.
Saudi Arabia's status remains ambiguous. Consensus is harder. Second, Iran-UAE
divides over West Asia. As noted, this is the minefield. Third is the de-dollarisation
narrative. India has framed BRICS as non-Western, not anti-Western. It does not
want an anti-US communiqué that will spook its Western partners.
Fourth
issue is China-India economic asymmetry. Bilateral trade with BRICS partners is
$417 billion, a third of India's merchandise trade, with exports expected to
double to $200 billion by 2030. But Chinese import dependence remains
sensitive.
Will
India rope in African countries like it did in G-20 with African Union
induction? Yes, but differently. India is not pushing formal expansion this
time — officials said India is not pursuing an expansion agenda. Instead, it is
doing outreach. Nigeria is invited as outreach, Egypt and Ethiopia are already
members providing Africa's voice, South Africa is championing AfCFTA and
infrastructure financing. India's play is to use NDB to fund water, sanitation
and PIDA infrastructure, and project its Digital Public Infrastructure model —
exactly what it did in G-20 to take credit as voice of Global South.
For
India, success will be defined by four metrics: One, a successful Modi-Xi
bilateral that stabilises LAC and resumes economic normalcy without conceding
strategic ground. If Xi comes and meets Modi, the summit is already a success.
Two, a declaration that is balanced - India wants a Delhi Declaration that
talks about reformed multilateralism, Global South voice, and development, but
avoids anti-West rhetoric or condemnation of West Asia that alienates UAE and
its own interests.
Three,
concrete deliverables on NDB, trade and digital - if Finance Ministers’ meeting
in Mumbai on September 9-10 can agree on BRICS Clear payment initiative and
local currency settlement, and on AI and agriculture cooperation, India can
claim practical outcome, not just photo-op. Four, Africa plus Global South
optics- bringing Nigeria, Ethiopia, Egypt and South Africa into a single frame
as development partners will allow Modi to reprise his G-20 African Union
success.
Challenges
are obvious. Managing Putin and Xi in Delhi while Antonio Guterres is also
present and while Trump-Xi-Putin summit talk casts a shadow will test India's
balancing art. Managing Iran-UAE contradiction in the same room will test its
drafting art. And managing expectations — 400 Chinese officials, 100 NSG
commandos, traffic sealed Delhi — the logistics is itself geopolitics.
BRICS
is, as one commentator said, the God of small things, but its problems with big
issues are becoming harder. India's job as chair is to keep it small,
practical, and Global South-centric. That itself would be summitry at its best
— burying hatchets, if only for two days in Delhi, to build resilience. ---INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
|
Hottest Month & Year: PLANET AT TIPPING POINT?, By Dhurjati Mukherjee, 9 Sept 2029 |
|
|
|
Open
Forum
New
Delhi, 9 September 2026
Hottest Month &
Year
PLANET AT TIPPING
POINT?
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
August was the hottest month for the world as
it was for India. The IMD shared a recent report by climate science platform,
Climate Brink, which forecast that 2026 is likely to become the warmest ever.
This year is on track for 1.620 C above pre-industrial levels, which
is over the annual global average rise recorded in 2024, in range of 1.550
C and 1.600 C benchmark.
The IMD data showed the national average mean
temperature soared to 28.010C, surpassing the historical normal of
27.240C by 0.670 C. Reports reveal the world is set
to permanently enter the 1.50 C temperature rise era, with the
average temperature potentially settling at around 1.80 C, though
several climate models predict the rise to reach 20 C or beyond.
Europe too is reported to be battling its
worst heat wave on record amid research suggesting the human body may be less
tolerant of extreme heat than previously believed; reinforcing global warming
could make parts of the planet too hot for human survival. A study published in
April found that earlier heat waves in Australia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and
Spain had breached physiological heat-stress thresholds. And latest reports of
June and July reveal conditions have worsened.
Reviewing the global situation, reports
indicate global average temperature has risen by only 1.50C and that
has been enough to transform the Northern Hemisphere temperatures, once
considered exceptional – 400C, becoming the norm. Prolonged
droughts, destructive wildfires and shrinking rivers are no longer freak
events. Last year, the European Union lost one million hectares to wildfires
and this by July-end reached 450,000 hectares.
The European continent has been reeling under
searing heat waves that have burned 500,000 hectares and killed over 10,000
people. Climate emergency is also in the United States, which saw yellow-grey
smoke drift across Canada’s wildfires onto its shores. Scientists opine
European-type situation beats the human fingerprint of climate change,
primarily driven by the burning of fossil fuels that releases Earth-warming
carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
Studies also have pointed that heat waves
have been occurring at high temperature and humidity levels which were once
thought to remain within levels of human survival. Earlier assessments have
underestimated the danger.
Extreme heat costs South Asia the equivalent
of 32 million full-time jobs every year. The recent World Development Report
(WDR) report ‘A Liveable Future: Tackling Extreme Heat for Jobs and Growth
in South Asia’s Cities’ warned that without action, the region’s GDP could
fall nearly 7 percent by 2050. Informal workers would be hit hardest – a single
heat wave can slash their earnings by 40 percent.
Another study published in the Earth
System Science Data journal, presented at the global climate meeting in
Germany, revealed that all indicators of global climate change have increased
since the last UN assessment report was published about years ago.
“Human activities pushed global warming to
1.370-C in 2025, and its level is predicted to surpass 1.50
C in about four years. Currently the rate at which heat is accumulating in the
Earth system suggests high levels of future warming”, warned the report.
According to the data, India’s surface air temperature has risen significantly
over the past century, leading to severe and prolonged heat waves. Summer
monsoon, a lifeline for agriculture and economy has become unpredictable.
Moreover, rainfall is forecast to be at least 10 percent less this year than
the long-term average due to global climate changes, coupled with a severe El
Nino phenomenon.
A recent Yale Centre for Environ Law and
Policy report titled Environment Protection Index 2026 ranked India 176
out of 177 countries, scoring 22.46 out of 100due to India’s low standing on
air pollution, high reliance on coal and inadequate biodiversity protection.
The very poor ranking of the country is obviously a cause of serious concern.
An interdisciplinary group of scientists of
the Stockholm Research Centre has adopted a method called Planetary Boundaries
Framework. Accordingly, there are nine key earth systems which, if treated
beyond safety limits through human activities, could result in large, sudden
changes in nature that have so far not been experienced. These nine critical
earth systems for monitoring include climate change, biodiversity loss,
phosphorus and nitrogen cycles, chemical pollution, ocean acidification, ozone
depletion, land use patterns, freshwater use and atmospheric aerosol loading.
Initially 200-odd scientists involved in the project found the complimentary
nature of these problems have been accentuating with every passing year.
Clearly, efforts underway to protect the
planet are grossly inadequate. The extent of global warming is getting
accentuated year after year. The big question is what strategy needs to be
adopted to ensure that heat is tolerable and that its effect in the realm of
agricultural as well as industrial production would not be harmful.
Apart from natural resources, water obviously
is crucial and strategic planning of its use and treatment is critical. More cost-effective
plans as well as the much-publicised rainwater harvesting schemes are needed.
The most important thing, however, are high levels of wastewater recycling that
is evident in water-stressed countries like Israel and Singapore. Even domestic
use must be regulated and wastage punished with a heavy
penalty.
Experts believe that water constraints will
shape India’s growth. In practice, this means future industrial capacity will
concentrate in regions that can demonstrate long-term water security, efficient
allocation and advanced reuse systems. Over time, water resilience will
influence both industrial and agricultural activity. India cannot pursue a
linear growth model in a non-linear water environment.
The recent wars in Russia-Ukraine and West
Asia have led to grave environmental catastrophe and ecocide. But such ecocide
is not expressly banned or defined under the framework of international law. Article
8(2)(b)(iv) of the Rome Statute has proved to be inadequate in this regard.
The International Criminal Court is yet to prosecute any nation under
the particular provision. Moreover, it is not known whether there has been any
attempt to document the ecological damages from the West Asian crisis, which
would be enormously grave, affecting the Gulf nations severely.
In sum, various factors put together ring
alarm bells. The challenge ahead to combat global warming is enormous. It must
be met and decisively. ---INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
|
Himalayas Losing Balance: GREATER STRAIN ON ECONOMY, Shivaji Sarkar, 7 Sept 2026 |
|
|
|
Economic Highlights
New Delhi, 7 September 2026
Himalayas Losing
Balance
GREATER STRAIN ON ECONOMY
Shivaji Sarkar
Unfathomable! In a matter of seconds, an
immense mass of ice, rock and frozen earth broke loose high in the Himalayas,
unleashing a violent cascade from the Tibetan heights into Nepal. What began at
nearly 5,000 metres high became a wall of water, mud, rock and ice racing
through the Lhende Khola, Bhote Koshi and Trishuli valleys, tearing through
settlements, roads and bridges and radicallyaltering the landscape below.
The sheer force was extraordinary. The
collapse produced a seismic signal initially mistaken for an earthquake, while
the debris travelled more than 20 km before the flood surged through the
Himalayan valleys. Entire riverside settlements disappeared beneath what
survivors described as a moving mass of mud and debris. The destruction
extended across Tibet and Nepal, with the downstream consequences reaching into
India.
But the visible destruction is only the
beginning. It is, the geological experts aver, is the beginning of a swifter
Indian sub-continental warming as 74 percent of the northern hemisphere permafrost stored
in Tibet being lost is likely to cause searing heat in Europe, the Atlantic
Ocean region extending to Greenland. Would we see many larger icebergs? Likely,
but no one knows.
This was not merely another Himalayan
flood;it was a geological warning. The Himalayas are a young, restless
mountain system, increasingly stressed by warming glaciers, thawing frozen
ground, unstable slopes and intense human intervention. Roads, tunnels, dams, hydropower
projects and expanding settlements are penetrating terrain whose geology remains
inherently fragile.
What makes the disaster particularly
disturbing is what cannot yet be seen. A major collapse can destabilise slopes,
alter river channels and create or disturb lakes, setting off chain of
landslides, debris flows and floods. One rupture can generate another, turning a
single catastrophe into a chain of events unfolding over years or decades.
And the loss is not merely economic majorly
for the subcontinent and particularly a vast swathe of Nepal, Bangladesh and
particularly the Indian landmass. A landscape shaped over millennia can be
transformed in minutes. Villages, forests, farmland, river courses and
ecological systems carry not only material wealth but the accumulated memory of
generations. Roads and bridges can be rebuilt; a vanished landscape, ecosystem
or cultural inheritance cannot simply be reconstructed.
Nor does the Himalayan disaster end where the
mountains descend into the plains. The rivers carry its consequences across
borders into Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and beyond, exposing agriculture,
settlements, infrastructure and economies downstream. What happens at height of
5,000 metres can become a crisis thousands of kilometres away.
The question, therefore, is no longer whether
the Himalayas are changing. It is whether the subcontinent/South Asia is
prepared for what that change could unleash— and what generations yet unborn may
inherit from our choices today.
It is yet to be assessed how much land would
remain agriculturally productive from a limited perspective of Himachal,
Uttarakhand, Nepal, northern Bengal, Sikkim, Arunachal and beyond. Perhaps large
farmlands would degenerate into sand fields and dunes, many depositions of
rubbles and further impoverish the people.
The breadbasket may shrink, hunger could grow
in the region and food prices the world over could spike. These are
possibilities as indicated by bridge, dam and barrage collapses, including the
mighty Farakka leading to a severe flood in Bangladesh. Damage and losses are incalculable
as well as not limited to time schedule.
Such was the force of the event, it was
initially reported as an earthquake of magnitude 4.4. The US Geological Survey
later determined the tremor was caused by glacial rock and ice collapsing,
registering a magnitude of 5.2.The collapse triggered a huge release of water,
mud, rock and ice that thundered down valleys and swept down the Lhende Khola,
Bhotekoshi and Trishuli rivers –the Gandak system in India.
The high-speed flash floods careered towards northern
Nepalese towns, including areas popular with mountaineering tourists and
pilgrims.Horrifying videos from the Gyirong border post, which connects Nepal
and Tibet, showed people running for their lives as the wall of debris
obliterated buildings and swept away lines of transport.
Third Pole Collapse - River Projects Useful?
The Third Pole, as the Himalayas are called,
collapse may usher in a severe earth heating from eastern Asia to Europe and
Greenland.Power lines under constructions and tunnels of the working of
innumerable power projects are choked with engineers, workers and technical
teams missing and cars blocking tunnels. Many projects may never be revived. Perhaps
it would lead to probes to find whether such schemes are profitable,
eco friendly or at all useful.
Massive downstream dam and hydropower
ambitions in sensitive zones like Arunachal Pradesh face severe exposure to
sudden upstream high-altitude flooding and mass-destructing events.It has
washed away railway stations, roads, offices, markets, and what not for over a
week in northern Bihar, and Bengal.
Magnitude Surpasses Kedarnath
Deaths are uncountable. Latest estimates say
it has surpassed the 2013 Kedarnath-Uttarakhand tally of 8000. Perhaps right.
It’s in a far wider, higher and more critical area that has shaken the
foundation of the Himalayas –world’s roof to floor shaken and now the race to
the Nepal to the Bay of Bengalis on.
Many ports and river routes may face
disruption, potentially reshaping both the ecology and economics from Nepal to
Northeast India. Restoring connectivity would be costly—and harder amid regional
geopolitical tensions.
The losses include rare Himalayan flora,
expensive medicinal plants, herbs, aromatic, life-saving plants and extremely
precious, forget about stones,minerals that are stored for millennia. Does the
Ganga water gets its speciality and unique qualities from these preserved soils?
None knows and now it would not be easy to establish the link.
Permafrost to Global Warming
Thawing Himalayan permafrost is more than a
geological concern. Its release of carbon and methane can accelerate warming,
while destabilising slopes and water systems. The Nepal tragedy exposes India’s
vulnerability across its fragile Himalayan states.
At around 17,000 feet, the scale and
consequences of the detached ice-rock mass remain uncertain. The Qinghai–Tibet
Plateau—the Earth’s Third Pole—holds the world’s largest expanse of alpine
permafrost, covering roughly one million sq km and storing enormous quantities
of carbon while regulating regional hydrology.
As this frozen system thaws, risks of glacier
loss, landslides, floods and further warming increase, with possible
implications for Asia’s desertification. A next rupture may be awaiting!
India has a formidable task ahead. Extant
institutions like the Planning Commission and entire agriculture and earth
sciences system need reorientation requiring billions. Can a strained economy
do it?---INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
|
7.8% GDP Growth: BUT WHERE IS THE HAPPINESS?, By Poonam I Kaushish, 8 Sept 2026 |
|
|
|
Political Diary
New Delhi, 8 September 2026
7.8%
GDP Growth
BUT WHERE
IS THE HAPPINESS?
By
Poonam I Kaushish
India has a new magic
number: 7.8%. The economy grew by 7.8% in first quarter of 2026-27 giving Government
reason to celebrate. Yet before drums roll louder and champagne is popped, one
question deserves an answer: Where is this growth in the life of an ordinary
Indian?
Not
in a spreadsheet, but in the household. GDP may be soaring, but are jobs? Are
wages keeping pace? Is household purchasing power up? Is disposable income
rising? Is poverty falling? Is the middle class breathing easier? And if the
economy is doing so well, why does economic security remain so elusive for so
many? And, most importantly, are Indians happier?
The
question is not whether 7.8% is real. The Centre has defended the new GDP
methodology, critics have questioned whether the revised calculations
adequately reflect what is happening on the ground. Both sides have made their
case. But reducing the debate to whether the number is “right” or “wrong” or celebration
vs cynicism misses the larger point: Where
is its multiplier effect on employment, wages and household prosperity? Can one
turn an economic statistic into a political certificate of good governance?
And nowhere is this
disconnect more visible than in India’s middle class. GDP is a measure of
economic output. It is not a measure of human wellbeing or how people
experience growth. A country can produce more cars, build more roads, sell more
financial services, consume more, record higher industrial output and invest
more without automatically making every household more secure while a young
graduate may struggle to find a decent job.
A salaried family may
see its savings eaten by school fees, a retiree may wonder whether one medical
emergency will wipe out his lifetime savings as millions remain unemployed,
worry about healthcare, insurance, housing and the next electricity bill. GDP does
not measure sleepless nights.
Ironically, the
middle class is India’s economic workhorse but increasingly its political
orphan. Think. It earns, spends and pays taxes: income tax on earnings, GST on
consumption, service tax, road tax, private security, school fees, healthcare,
insurance and funds public services through taxation.
It receives fewest
subsidies with zilch in return except patchy services: inflated bills, broken
roads, potholes, flooding, ghoos, hafta, cut
money etc. It is expected to applaud growth, absorb inflation, comply with
every new digital requirement and somehow keep consuming to keep the economy
humming. Alongside, the extraordinary expectation that it should pay privately
for what the State promises publicly.
Any
wonder the middle class is angry as India has become a democracy of vote banks.
Every caste is counted, courted and compensated. The poor have welfare politics,
farmers organised pressure, caste groups political arithmetic, communities political
negotiators, disadvantaged groups champions and rich are accommodated. Leaders can
tell exactly how many votes they need from every caste, community and
beneficiary group.
But
ask about the middle class and suddenly their arithmetic goes blank as it is neither
sufficiently poor for welfare nor sufficiently powerful to demand concessions. But
has a tax department and is expected to cope. Bringing things to such a pass
where it increasingly feels its’ the ATM
of the Republic.
Do
our leaders care about the middle class who pay bills? Given rising household
costs and cost of living. Has politics become focused on redistribution that
the productive, tax-paying middle class is taken for granted? Why is there no improvement
in services as Government’s tax revenues boom?
It
is expected to celebrate GDP growth, absorb inflation when prices rise, pay
taxes when incomes rise and applaud digitisation when transactions become
easier. But when does the State ask whether citizen’s disposable income, job
security and quality of life have risen with the economy?
A
nation is not a spreadsheet. GDP can grow but citizens do not eat GDP, educate
children, pay taxes and hospital bills with GDP. They are too fragmented to
become a vote bank and too law-abiding to make its grievances electorally
threatening. Governments cannot ask citizens to judge the economy by
macroeconomic numbers when they experience it through microeconomic realities.
Why do we measure
success through production, consumption and investment but treat wellbeing as a
sentimental afterthought? The World Happiness Report doesn’t pretend GDP is
irrelevant. It simply recognises that income is only one component of a good
life. Social support, health, freedom and ability to lead a meaningful life
matter too.
If growth is 7.8% it
is an opportunity Government must seize, not merely rejoice. Strong growth
should generate investment, employment, higher incomes and eventually a larger,
more secure middle class. The Government has spent considerable political
capital telling middle class it is its Government. Prime Minister Modi
describes middle class as central to nation-building and highlights tax relief
and “ease of living.” If it is so important to Government, why does it have so
little political voice?
The real test of growth
is not how much the economy produces but what production does for people’s
lives? How many jobs are created? What is happening to household purchasing
power? Is productivity translating into wages, social security, trust,
opportunity and a sense of wellbeing?
Is the benefit of
growth reaching the bottom and middle or accumulating disproportionately at the
top? Because growth without distribution creates prosperity statistics; growth
with opportunity creates prosperity.
India’s
ambition to become a developed economy by 2047 should mean more than becoming a
larger economy. Development is not merely becoming richer. It is becoming
better off. That means growth creating jobs that pay, not merely jobs that
count. It means wages rising with productivity, a family not being financially
devastated by illness, parents not having to spend their life savings on
exorbitant private education and uncertain public alternatives.
Women should not have
to calculate whether their economic independence is worth the cost of
inadequate safety and infrastructure and elderly should not regard retirement
as a financial cliff, they should have dignity rather than dependence and opportunity
should become broad-based rather than concentrated.
Perhaps the real GDP
debate is not whether India grew by 7.8%. It is whether the middle class grew
with it. Because, an economy can become richer on paper while its citizens
remain poorer in opportunity, security, confidence and hope. At some point, GDP
must leave the Government spreadsheet and enter the citizen’s kitchen,
classroom, workplace and wallet.
The Government sees
GDP, citizen sees EMI, Government sees consumption, citizen sees grocery bill,
Government sees digital transactions, citizen sees dwindling bank balance. The Government
sees growth. The citizen asks: what grew for me? Somewhere between the two lies
the real story of India’s growth. Until then, 7.8% may be a remarkable economic
number. But a number is not a national mood. --- INFA
(Copyright India News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
|
A DEMOCRATIC ALTERNATIVE, By Inder Jit, 4 Sept 2026 |
|
|
|
REWIND
New
Delhi, 4 September 2026
A
DEMOCRATIC ALTERNATIVE
By Inder Jit
(Released on 25 April
1978)
Appraisals
and reappraisals, many agonising, appear to have become the order of the day
for various political parties and politicians in quest of power. Top Janata
leaders have held another exercise in heart-searching and “operation survival”,
stimulated by Mr Nanaji Deshmukh’s timely think bomb. The CPM and the CPI
lenders have informally met to explore the possibility of unity among left
democratic forces to fight back the renewed threat from the ‘fascists’ and
their storm-troopers. Equally important are the informal discussions now on
among Congressmen, led by Mr Swaran Singh, Mr Chavan and Mr Brahamanda Reddi,
about their role in national affairs and prospects for the future in the light
of Mrs Indira Gandhi’s increasing success in getting their partymen to join her
colourful bandwagon. Many appropriately ask: is the Congress still relevant?
Or, is it now set to be cast unceremoniously into the dust-bin of history?
Most
people appear to have already written off the Congress in keeping with our
characteristic inclination to swing to conclusions. The party’s present eclipse
is being generally confused with irrelevance. Yet leading Congressmen and many
intellectuals are of the view that the Congress in not only relevant but has a
positive role to play in the crisis that currently grips the country. Indeed, a
few go further and assert that the Congress is as relevant today as it was
prior to independence. In 1947, the party brought about political independence
and achieved one of its two historic tasks. The other task of ushering in economic
and social independence still remains to be accomplished. As aa top Congress
leader put its “Our party today has neither power nor money. We are, therefore,
in a position to identify ourselves with the common man once again, understand
his hopes and frustrations better and draw upa minimum grass-roots programme.”
The
Indira Congress, no doubt, claims to be the “real Congress”. However, Mr Swaran
Singh and others draw pointed attention to basic differences between the two
Congresses. Mrs Gandhi’s Congress, it is urged, is based on “authoritarian
personality cult and has little regard for democracy or the democratic way of
life.” In sharp contrast, the Congress, it is emphasised, stands firmly by its
commitment to democracy, democratic methods and fundamental freedoms. Indeed,
Congressmen claim that their party alone offers “democratic alternative” to the
Janata Party. Such a democratic alternative is required at any time in a
parliamentary democracy to ensure its healthy functioning and growth. But it is
needed even more so today in view of the increasing disenchantment of the
people with the Janata Party and because of the character of Indian politics,
the broad pattern of Indian voting and the outlook and approach of the average
Indian to punishment for crime against individuals or the community.
Voting
in India shows two broad trends. First, voters generally seem to move in waves,
depending upon the emotions roused. Second, the approach is more negative than
positive; a vote is often given not so much for a party as against another. In
1967, for instance, the people were angry with the Congress and voted the party
out in many States. Four years later, the voter turned against the non-Congress
parties and the country saw Mrs Gandhi ride to power on an unprecedented Indira
wave. In March last year, the people, conscious of their power, turned their
wrath against Mrs Gandhi and her caucus and knocked the Congress for a six. In
Karnal recently, the country witnessed yet another wave. An angry people
decided to teach the Janata Party a lesson for its poor performance -- and for
taking them for granted. The Janata candidate’s margin of victory was slashed
from some three lakh votes to barely about 18,000 votes.
Conscious
of this trend, top Congress leaders are determined to keep their flag aloft and
be available as democratic alternative. The task, it is conceded, is not easy.
They lack Mrs Gandhi’s dynamism and charisma-- as also the money power and the
muscle power of the Indira Congress. But they are clear that there is no scope
whatsoever of any honourable unity”, a point emphasised by Mr Chavan at the
meeting of the Maharashtra P.C.C. Unity, in fact, is seen as an illusion and
nothing other than “humiliating surrender” since there is no scope for any
compromise on the question of personality cult and authoritarianism. Not a few among
Congressmen eager somehow to get back into power have angrily argued that their
party will be reduced to the position of the Congress (0). Mr Chavan has,
however, countered the argument by saying: “Yes the Congress (0) was reduced to
a small party. But history will record that Congress (0) provided India with
its fourth Prime Minister.”
Some
clever Indira Congressmen have tried to exploit these remarks to embarrass Mr
Chavan by unfairly remarking: “So, Mr Chavan wants to be Prime Minister.” But
Mr Chavan and his colleagues are not deterred in their resolve by such tactics.
Few at the last meeting of the Congress Working Committee in New Delhi were
inclined to go along with Mr V.P. Naik, who put forward his views on the
question of unity. In any case, the Maharashtra P.C.C. resolution tossed the
ball in the court of the Indira Congress. The response so far from the Congress
(I) has not only been negative but has confirmed the view put forward by Mr
Chavan. The Indira Congress is no longer willing to take any Congressman “honourably”
into its fold. The “open-door” policy is now a thing of the past. Instead, the
Indira Congress has announced its decision to go in for selective admissions. “If
this is not asking one to surrender, what else is it?”asked another Congress
leader.
In
their resolve to stay separate, top Congress leaders have also gone by the
advice of a veteran of many political battles and victories. Some three months
ago he visited New Delhi from his place of retirement and intellectual pursuit
and advised his colleagues in so many words: “Indira Congress will become
Sanjay Congress in three years from now. You friends will have no place in it.
Why then allow Mrs Gandhi to exploit you once again? Instead, keep your
identity and fight for principles.” Significantly, his assessment was based on
a talk with Mrs Gandhi some ten months earlier. He then told Mrs Gandhi: “The
people still have regard for you. But they will not tolerate Sanjay. My advice,
therefore, is: Make a public declaration that you have advised Sanjay to
withdraw from politics and you will not either help or encourage him.” Mrs
Gandhi, according to this veteran, replied after a brief pause: “I don't know
why people are against Sanjay. What has he done...”
Happily
for Mr Swaran Singh, Mr Chavan and Mr Reddi the morale of their party is not as
low as is widely made out to be. In fact, Mr Swaran Singh has decided to
continue as President only as part of the collective decision not to do
anything which may in any way cause demoralisation. During his absence abroad,
Mr Chavan will look after the work of the President. In fact, Mr Chavan is now
busy travelling around and recently visited Assam and Orissa where he found
Congressmen like Mr Sarat Sinha and many others standing rock-like on the
decision to keep the “real Congress” going. Earlier, Mr Chavan visited Kerala
and was happy to find the State’s Chief Minister, Mr Antony, and other
Congressmen, including Mr Vyalar Ravi and Mr K.P. Unnikrishnan, both MPs,
solidly with him. Mr Chavan is now hoping that together with like-minded partymen
they can hold their AlCC meeting or national convention on May 14 and 15 and do
two things. Reassert their separate democratic identity; and put forward a
clear-cut programme before the nation.
For
the present, attention is being directed to the forthcoming poll battle in
Azamgarh where Mr Chandrajit Yadav is contesting the by-election to the Lok
Sabha against a former supporter, Mr Ram Bachan Yadav, now contesting on the
Janata ticket, and an erstwhile colleague, Mrs Mohsina Kidwai, nominee of the
Indira Congress. (In 1967, Mr Ram Bacchan Yadav had reportedly met some members
of the Congress Central Parliamentary Board to plead for a Lok Sabha ticket for
Mr Chandrajit Yadav). Unlike in the South, the Congress Party proposes not to
be on the defensive and gracefully admit its Himalayan blunder in supporting
Mrs Gandhi and her authoritarian rule. A few leaders are even talking in terms
of some demonstration of praischit (atonement) for their sins of
omission and commission. Azamgarh, it is realised, offers the party both a
challenge and an opportunity. Time and patience, its leaders claim, are on
their side---INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
| | << Start < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
| | Results 10 - 18 of 6624 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|