|
|
|
|
|
|
Iran-Pak Pipeline Deal:POOR ECONOMICS WITHOUT INDIA, by Monish Tourangbam, 2 June 2009 |
|
|
Round The World
New Delhi, 2 June 2009
Iran-Pak Pipeline Deal
POOR ECONOMICS WITHOUT INDIA
By Monish Tourangbam
Research Scholar, School
of International Studies,
JNU
Iran and Pakistan
have gone ahead and signed the long-stalled pipeline deal to transport gas from
the Persian Gulf sans India.
In doing so, Tehran and Islamabad have tried to put the ball in New Delhi’s
court, by keeping open the option for India to join the project, which was
initially fashioned as a trilateral venture.
Clearly,
this overture by the two countries would provide ample food for thought for the
incumbent Foreign Minister Krishna as the project is vital to India’s foreign
policy calculations. The project termed as 'Peace Pipeline' has been inked by
President Zardari and his Iranian counterpart Mahmoud Ahmedinejad in Tehran on the sidelines of the tripartite
Iran-Pakistan-Afghanistan Summit on Afghanistan’s security.
The National Iranian Gas Export Company’s Managing
Director and the CEO of Pakistan’s Inter-State Gas Systems (ISGS) put the
finishing touches on the deal after two days of negotiations. The ISGS is a semi-autonomous body
looking after Pakistan’s
interests in international gas
pipeline
projects to import gas
from Iran and Turkmenistan.
A Pakistani delegation led by Pakistan’s Federal
Minister of Petroleum and Natural Resources Asim Hussain worked out the final
details of the deal based on a new price formula suggested by Tehran and
approved by Pakistan’s Cabinet on May 23 last. According to the deal, Iran would initially transfer 30 million cubic
meters of gas per day to Pakistan
but would eventually increase the gas transfer to 60 million cubic meters per
day.
The
two countries are expected to sign the formal agreement for the gas pipeline
project, to be completed in five years, in a third country within the next few
days. According to Pakistan’s
Petroleum Ministry sources, the pipeline
would enter Pakistan
from its border near Gwader area to Nawabshah, which is the hub of gas
pipelines
in the country.
According
to the original project, India
was a vital part of the “peace pipeline” but various concerns made New Delhi hesitant. Primarily,
the issues of commercial viability and pricing. Foreign Ministry mandarins
argued that India could not sign
the pipeline agreement until the issues of transit fee and tariff with Pakistan were
sorted out on a bilateral basis. Notwithstanding, New Delhi continuing to maintain its commitment
to the proposed trilateral venture.
Islamabad is seeking 49 cents per mBtu (million British thermal unit)
as transit fee, while New Delhi
has offered 15 cents ($60 million a year) for providing security and right of
way to the pipeline. Earlier, India
and Pakistan
had narrowed down their differences on the transportation tariff. Islamabad wanted 70 cents per mBtu as wheeling charges but
New Delhi offered
no more than 55 cents ($220 million annually). The two sides have now agreed to
base it on the actual cost of building and operating the 1,035-km pipeline in Pakistan.
Iran, Pakistan
and India
are to separately build the pipeline segments falling under their respective territories.
The pipeline would transport 90 mcmd (million cubic meters per day) of gas, out
of which 30 mcmd would be for internal consumption in Iran. The
remaining was to be split equally between India
and Pakistan.
Iran also plans to begin export of gas
to Pakistan
by end of 2013. Most of the 1,035-km section of pipeline in Pakistan was to connect local consumption
centres and if India
were to join the project, only a small pipeline section would be needed to
extend it to the India-Pakistan border.
Apart
from the economics of the project, the deteriorating India-Pakistan
relationship has not helped matters either. Add to this the all-too inherent
geo-political constraints for New Delhi when it
comes to doing business with Islamabad.
The
internal situation in Pakistan
is not welcoming either for materialization of such an ambitious project with
high stakes involved in terms of profitability and loss. The Pakistani economy
and the domestic scenario do not have a semblance of stability, with the Government
and the military largely busy in dealing with the over-arching influence of the
Taliban.
Worse,
post the Mumbai terrorist attacks Indo-Pak relations have taken a downward
spiral and for New Delhi to do any meaningful
business with Islamabad, the latter has to
honestly assist India’s
probe on the Mumbai attacks.
Moreover,
the Washington
connection cannot be ignored. The US, particularly the erstwhile Bush Administration
had always made plain its displeasure to the trilateral pipeline project. Thus,
it is not hard to discern that New Delhi does
not want to disrupt the recent thaw in US-India relations by signing the deal
that would provide a source of revenue to Tehran.
Further,
the pipeline would also prove to be a source of income for Pakistan by way of transit fees and tariff,
something New Delhi
wants to avoid. But, in view of the deal signed between Iran and Pakistan
and the trilateral summit (Iran-Pakistan-Afghanistan) that Pakistan and Afghanistan
--- two countries where the US
has hugely invested --- attended in Tehran,
the new Obama Administration needs to come out soon with its policy on the
pipeline project.
In
fact, the Pakistani Dawn newspaper
citing official sources reported, “the change of stance from the Pakistani Government
and the pace of developments at the project suggest that the strong US opposition
has softened.”
The
deal is being seen more as a tactic to put pressure on India as the project's financial
viability remains doubtful without New
Delhi's participation. The real market for Iranian gas
lies in India,
with its expanding population and growing energy consumption. Without India, Pakistan would be deprived of the
transit fee.
Significantly,
the influence of the “Red Dragon” (read China) is relevant to this issue as
well. After signing the deal, Iran
and Pakistan kept open the
choice for India
to join the project. Agency reports quoted officials of both countries stating
that “India
or any other country can join later”. The word “other’, observers say, signifies
pressure tactics as it hints at China.
Pakistan has been aiming to rope in China for a long time, with former Pak President
Pervez Musharraf making the offer in a speech at the Tsinghua
University during his last Beijing tour. Even if
China were to enter the project and present Pakistan with a good amount of
transit fees, constructing and maintaining a trans-Himalayan pipeline to
Western China would be an uphill task, and not as enticing as the easily accessible an equally profitable market like
India.
In
the ultimate, the deal assumes prominence for both Ahmadinejad and Zardari. By
signing the deal with Iran
and bypassing India could
increase Zardari’s credibility in Pakistan and divert attention from
the explosive domestic scene. With the upcoming Iranian elections, Ahmadinejad
might want to sell the deal as a show of Iran’s developing self-reliance and
defiance of the West, and thus overshadow criticism over his economic policies.
Thus,
as matters stand now, it seems logical for New Delhi
to be apprehensive of entering the project in the absence of any meaningful
dialogue with Pakistan,
which is passing through one of its most tumultuous times. ---- INFA
(Copyright India News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
Declining Parliament:NEW SPEAKER, NEW CHAPTER?,by Poonam I Kaushish,6 June 2009 |
|
|
POLITICAL DIARY
New Delhi, 6 June 2009
Declining
Parliament
NEW SPEAKER, NEW
CHAPTER?
By Poonam I Kaushish
Believe it or not, winds of change seem to be sweeping
across Parliament. If you feel that’s impossible, think again. A valiant effort
is being made to ‘put-in’ reformation mode India’s high temple of democracy.
Of course, it remains to be seen if our MPs’ play ‘fair’!
It took all of seven minutes to script a new beginning of
the 15th Lok Sabha on Wednesday last. When 64-year-old five-term MP
Meira Kumar rode high on optimism into history books. By achieving a rare
double of becoming the first Dalit woman Lok Sabha Speaker. Making plain that
she was no pushover, meant business and would not hesitate to crack the whip,
Meira vowed to run the House as per “the Constitution rules and traditions. We
should discuss and debate, and if need be, we should express our differences in
a gentle manner without affecting the working of the House.”
She also underscored her intension of restoring the Lok
Sabha’s long lost glory drowned in the cacophony of petty foggers,
one-upmanship and conmanship. Parliament should function through debate,
discussion and consensus which she felt was possible if our MPs adopted an
attitude of cooperation rather than confrontation. Wherein the MPs would adhere
to the rules and follow the numerous conventions and customs. Her message ran
loud and clear: Put the Lok Sabha back on the rails.
However, what Madam Speaker proposed the MPs disposed. Within minutes of taking charge she got a
taste of things to come. When RJD leader Lalu and his JD(U) counterpart Sharad
Yadav got into a slanging match over the former’s references to previous
Speaker Somnath Chatterjee and the Indo-US nuclear deal in his congratulatory
speech. Accused the JD(U) chief, “don’t inject rajniti on this occasion. Countered Lalu, “Ab aap se updesh sunne padenge (Will I have to endure sermons from
you).” Net result? Expunction of the tu-tu-mein-mein.
But this was only the tip of the iceberg of the many
discords that await the new Speaker. Already male battle-lines are drawn over
the Women Reservation Bill which the Government intends turning into reality
soon. Thundered Sharad Yadav again, “I will consume poison but not let the
women’s quota bill pass.” Plainly, notwithstanding
the empowerment message in Meira’s elevation, the ‘belan vs pagri' issue remains a hot potato. Wherein, the Speaker
would need all her wherewithal and restraint in the coming days.
More so as the challenges confronting the nation have increased
manifold. The country is today in the throes of increasing social and economic
tensions. In addition, there are forces within and without eager to destabilise
India
and disrupt its unity and integrity. Which calls for reasoned debate. Instead,
till date even a one-man Opposition army has prevented discussion by holding
the House to ransom. Not a few members have made it a habit of rushing into the
well of the House. All spew sheer contempt.
We take great pride in calling ourselves the world’s largest
democracy. Yet most of us forget that Parliamentary democracy provides for a
civilized form of government based on discussion, debate and consensus.
Ruthless politics has taken over and discussions and debates have largely lost
their meaning. Numbers alone matter and have become the sole criteria of
success. Bringing things to such a pass that pursuit of power, pelf and
patronage is replacing law making.
In this milieu, the Speaker’s role has become all the more
important and demanding. Few in India, however,
appreciate even today the key role of the Speaker without whom, according to
Erskine May, “the House has no Constitutional existence.” Nehru repeatedly
emphasised the importance of the office of the Speaker and laid emphasis on its
prestige and authority. Said he in 1958: “The Speaker represents the House. He
represents the dignity of the House, the freedom and liberty. Therefore, it is
right that his should be an honoured position, a free position and should be
occupied always by men of outstanding ability and impartiality.
Nehru as the leader of the House encouraged by his own
conduct the Chair to be independent and impartial. Elders recall how Nehru once
clashed with Speaker Mavalankar on the floor of the Lok Sabha when the latter
disallowed him from making a second statement in one day in contravention of
the rules. Nehru agitatedly argued: “But Mr Speaker Sir…” However, he soon
resumed his seat as the Speaker asserted: “Order, order. The Prime Minister
will take his seat!” Incredible as it may seem in today’s India, Mavalankar once allowed an adjournment
motion against Sardar Patel to discuss the escape of Mir Laik Ali, Prime
Minister of Nizam’s Hyderabad from India.
Clearly to conduct the business of the House smoothly, there
has to be stern discipline. Discussions
have to be made more meaningful and focused through a strict time schedule.
Today, time management has become a joke. Most Speakers have been much too
indulgent, allowing senior Party leaders to speak way beyond their allotted
time. Not a few leaders speak as though they are speaking in a public meeting
or a political rally.
Consequently, crucial legislative business meriting in-depth
debate gets rushed through with only a cursory glance. There is no such thing
as first, second and third readings of bills as during Parliament’s golden era
under Nehru. Unlike in past, the Chair has to make sure that money bills are
not passed without debate. Worse, the demands for grants of various Ministries
and Departments, running into lakhs of crores of rupees are guillotined without
any discussion because time gets wasted on non-issues.
No doubt, Madam Speaker has to walk a tight rope. She has to
ensure among other things that the Opposition has its say even as the
Government has its way. For starters take a leaf out of the book of the West to
save time, wherein the microphone is switched off as soon as a MP finishes his
allotted time. Winston Churchill once told his party MPs that ordinary members
should endeavour to make only one point in their speeches. It is the privilege
of Prime Ministers alone to make two points!
True, there is no magic remedy. The process has to be slow
and long. Nevertheless, a meaningful beginning could be made if the new Speaker
puts an end to brazen rowdysim. The Chair needs to ensure that the House is not
held to ransom through a ‘gang up’ of MPs determined to disrupt its smooth
functioning. Any member crossing the Lakshman
Rekha and rushing into the well of the House should automatically stand
suspended for a week. In fact, this measure was part of a code drawn up by
former Speaker Balayogi. But it was never enforced. Sadly, spine was lacking.
What next? Clearly, it is time to give serious thought to
rectifying the flaws in our system and urgently overhauling it. Rules have to
be drastically changed to put Parliament back on the rails and ensure that none
can hold the House to ransom. First and foremost, we have to be clear: Are we
for democracy as a civilized form of Government or have we degenerated into
what the former President Giri once described as a “democracy” of devils and
fixers? A feudal democracy run like a family enterprise?
In the final analysis, Speaker Meira Kumar needs to heed
Indira Gandhi’s words: “Parliament is even as a bulwark of democracy… It has
also a very heavy task of keeping an image that will gain it the faith and
respect of the people. Because, if that is lost, then I don’t know what could
happen later.” That faith and respect requires to be restored and built by the
new Speaker through a new chapter. Any takers?---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
Special Status Category:NEW BUZZWORD AMONG STATES, by Insaf,4 June 2009 |
|
|
Round The States
New Delhi, 4 June 2009
Special Status
Category
NEW BUZZWORD AMONG
STATES
By Insaf
Special status seems to be the new buzzwords resounding in
States from East to West, North to South India.
After Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, it is the turn of his counterpart
Ashok Gehlot in Rajasthan to demand special State status. Chhattisgarh,
Jharkhand, Orissa, Goa and Puducherry too have
joined the me-too chorus. Recall, Nitish Kumar created a flutter prior to the
elections results when he voiced his support for any Government at the Centre
which granted Bihar special category status.
The State suffers from endemic economic backwardness. The case of Rajasthan is slightly different.
After a lull of 10-years, Gehlot has reiterated his special status demand.
Plainly, he intends in-cashing the fact that the Congress is ruling both at the
Centre and the State. According to him, the large desert State with a unique
topography is perennially facing acute shortages, receding ground water levels,
scanty rainfall, poor roads, medical and housing facilities. Wherein providing
basic facilities like bijli, sadak, paani
was extremely difficult and arduous task. However, politically speaking
granting special status to both States is easier said than done
Arguably, if large, mainstream States are given special
treatment, the meaning of the word ‘special’ would blur. Uttar Pradesh could be
next in line with a similar demand. Presently, 11 small States flaunt the
special status tag. Namely, the seven North-eastern States,
Sikkim, Uttarakhand, Jammu and Kashmir
and Himachal Pradesh. Not many are aware that ‘special’ status is accorded to
States having harsh terrain, inadequate economic and social infrastructure,
backwardness, predominant tribal population and a weak resource base. The
special State status is in the context of Centre-State finances. It entails a
State getting a bigger share of the Centre's resource pie and significant
excise duty concessions to help industrial development. Apart from that, 30% of
the Centre's gross budgetary support for Plan expenditure goes to
special-category States. Thus, given this backdrop any change in the share of
the Central assistance pie going to the 11 special category States would raise
controversy, within the group and without. Better to let sleeping dogs lie!
* * * *
Lover’s Tiff In
Karnataka?
All appears not to be well with the BJP in Karnataka. Even
as Chief Minister Yediyurappa uncorked the champagne at the first anniversary
party of the first BJP Government in the South, the fizz seems to have
evaporated. Four key Ministers and 12 MLAs gave the party a skip. Ostensibly to
express their angst against the Chief Minister’s emerging as a power centre
“following the big victory in the Lok Sabha
polls.” Known as the Bellary brigade, the
leaders are reportedly close to the famous Reddy brothers of Bellary’s iron ore mines who played a major
role in ensuring the BJP’s electoral win last year. Between them the brothers
control 40 of the BJP’s 116 MLAs in the Assembly. Known as Yediyurappa’s
‘alternate’ ego, the Reddy’s are angry with the Chief Minister for giving
preference to his son over his friends. All eyes are on Yediyurappa, will he
make up? It is a moot point if it ends
in being only a lovers tiff.
* * * *
Electoral Winds Of
Change In Gujarat
Electoral winds of change are all set to sweep Gujarat. In an unprecedented move, the Gujarat State
Election Commission (SEC) intends barring people above the age of 65 years from
contesting any local body election. Not only that. Only a graduate can contest
the post of a municipal councilor. With an intention to overhaul, the manner in
which local self-Government bodies, both in rural and urban areas, are
constituted, the SEC has also recommended disqualification of any candidate who
has an FIR against his/her name and has been charged. Presently, only those who
have been convicted are ineligible for election. Among the various other
suggestions, the draft proposal also intends giving the voters the right of recall
their non-performing representatives. Unlike the present practice of angutha chaaps being elected to
Panchayats, now a candidate would need a SSC qualifications to be eligible for
village panchayat polls and be 12th class pass to qualify for a
Taluk / District Panchayat or Municipal polls. Voting is also to be made
compulsory across the State. It remains to be seen if the word of the SEC will
change the way elections are fought.
* * * *
NREGS Thrust In
Rajasthan
Rajasthan is likely to see the State Administration going
full steam ahead on the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS).
Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot is eager to strengthen the job scheme and evolve a
corruption-free system in its implementation, as urged by Magsasay award winner
Aruna Roy and her Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sanghatan on Sunday last. He has also responded positively to her
suggestion for setting up a social audit unit in the State to look into the
functioning of the job schemes and other departments. Aruna Roy also wants the
CM to improve the implementation of the Right to Information Act on two fronts:
one, by recruiting more personnel and two by pro-active disclosure campaigns by
the government so that people are regularly informed. Obviously, Gehlot would like
to cash in on the pro-poor NREGS which
enabled the Congress to do remarkably well in the recent elections.
* * * *
Cyclone Aila Adds
To CPM Woes In W Bengal
West Bengal continues to hog the headlines for
all the wrong reasons. First it was a resounding defeat of the Red Brigade in
its home State, now cyclone Aila continues to wreck havoc on the State even as
a harried and hapless Chief Minister Buddhadev Bhattacharya tries to grapple
with the people’s rising anger. In fact,
the cyclone has exposed how ill-equipped the State machinery is to deal with
this devastation that has wrought destruction on the people in all the19
districts, specially North and South 24 Parganas. Worse, there is total lack of
any relief and rehabilitation measures. Sundarbans which has taken the hardest
hit. In fact, the Chief Minister has had to beat a hasty retreat in the all the
cyclone-affected districts. Needless to say this natural calamity is just a
manifestation that the CPM better set its house in order before 2011 when the
State Assembly elections are due and it would have to face the people’s fury.
* * * *
Water Rationing In
MP
Look at the irony. There is water-water everywhere in West Bengal but
not a drop to drink in parched Madhya Pradesh. In a first of sorts, a tiny
Municipal body in Sehore town is all set to issue water cards to residents to
ensure rationing and equitable distribution of liquid gold. Each resident will
get 50 litres of water per day. Shockingly, Sehore gets water once in four days
while the other towns in MP get water once in two days. In fact, the State
Government has imposed preventive measure under Section 144 of the Criminal
Procedure Code around the 122-km long water supply pipelines to protect them
from any ‘deliberate’ damage. With taps running dry in many towns, violence is
rocking the State like never before. Already, seven murders have taken place
and over 45 cases of violence reported from all over the State. Year after year
the story is same. Parched throats crying for water and a ‘dried-up’ Government
coming up with shriveled ideas.
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
Higher Education:INSTITUTIONS TO EXPAND REACH, by Dhurjati Mukherjee, 1 June 2009 |
|
|
People & Their
Problems
New Delhi, 1 June 2009
Higher
Education
INSTITUTIONS
TO EXPAND REACH
By
Dhurjati Mukherjee
The government’s commitment to set up a Central University
in each State to lend a helping hand and ensure that each district gets a
college is a welcome development. The plan is to set up 30 universities across
the country to make available higher education to a larger segment of the
population as also to raise its standard. This comes close on the heels after
the government’s decision to have more specialized institutes on science and
technology.
Importantly, the National Knowledge Commission (NKC) had recommended
that opportunities for higher education are not adequate and that there should
be 50 national universities and a total of 1,500 universities nation-wide that
would enable India
attain a gross enrolment ratio of at least 15 per cent by 2015.
Presently the country has 20 Central universities – 18
funded by the UGC -- but these are spread over nine States, Delhi
and Pondicherry.
One Central university will be located in each of the 16 uncovered States,
while 14 new ones will come up in States which provide land free of cost in
attractive locations. As for degree colleges, the Central government would
provide all help to the States to start 370 new ones and strengthen 6,000 in
districts, where the gross enrolment ratio is low.
Meanwhile, the Planning Commission has proposed a seven-year
special Plan (2007-14) which includes setting up eight new IITs, seven new
IIMs, 20 NITs, 20 IIITs and 50 centres for training and research in frontier
areas. Of the IITs, three are already operational. Five Indian Institutes of
Science Education & Research have been set up. As for technical education,
expansion and upgradation of 200 such institutions in various States has been
envisaged. The plan for higher and technical education will start in the 11th
Plan and spill over to the next without being diluted. Funding of Rs 1.31 lakh
crore is proposed for the seven-year Plan, whereas the NKC wants an outlay of
1.5 per cent of GDP for higher education alone.
Since Independence
higher education has been marked by a steady expansion of colleges and
universities, setting up of distance education system and several initiatives
to promote access and equity. The annual growth has been estimated to be around
3.5 to 4 per cent per annum which, however, is far from actual needs. As such,
the enrolment ratio has not been satisfactory and is estimated at 9.1 per cent.
The government hopes to raise it to at least 15 per cent by 2012 which is way
behind the 40-50% figure of the developed countries.
University education as such has not been lagging behind in
quality, but its reach is limited because of the ever-increasing population. India was once
regarded as one of the premier centres of scientific and historical research in
the Asian continent. It can boast of the best universities like in Chennai, Kolkata
and Mumbai and Central universities such as the JNU, Viswa Bharati and Benaras Hindu University.
Then there are specialized institutions for scientific and technical educations
like the IITs, which are of a high order. Management institutions such as IIMs
and private colleges like Manipal University and Ramakrishna Mission
Vivekananda University
too have attracted foreign students. In fact, engineering education has found
recognition with the country recently being made a provisional member of the
Washington Accord, a 10-member global apex organization.
In recent times, induction of new disciplines for study and
research is attracting many more students. These include environmental science,
disaster management, computer applications/engineering, informatics, forensic
science, hotel and tourism management, religious studies and biotechnology. It
is important that the centres for higher education must keep pace with changing
times and, courses for which there is both a need and demand have to be
formulated. Likewise, private participation in higher education should be
welcome as a segment of the population can meet the high costs involved.
However, higher education is also under criticism because of
declining standards, parochialism, dogmatism and lack of sincerity of both
teachers and students. Ramachandra Guha, well-known critic and historian, has
observed that from the 50s to the 80s, major debates about Indian society and
history were centred in the country. But even though Indian scholars lead the
debates even today, they are more likely to work in western universities and
publish their papers in their journals.
Another development is of specialized universities or
institutes. The South
Asian University
is one such example and is to be set up shortly with both students and faculty
from all the SAARC nations. The government is also considering setting up the
Workers’ Technical University in Hyderabad
(with 13 regional centres) catering to an estimated three lakh workers/students
a year. It would be one of its kinds and shall ensure that the 40-crore
workers’ population, of which 98 per cent is in the unorganized sector, is able
to upgrade its skill and meet the demands of industry.
This apart, there is a proposal to revive the 800 year-old Nalanda
University having an international character with seven schools (with 4,530
students and 453 faculty members), offering integrated post-graduate and
research programmes in informatics, development studies, social sciences
etc.
Clearly, advancement of knowledge and human resources are
now acknowledged as pre-requisites for social and economic growth. The
country’s brain drain needs to be checked and more qualified scientific and
technical personnel are required to sustain the growth momentum of 8+ per cent
over the coming decade. Thus, higher education has not only to be expanded but quality
must meet desirable standards.
In order to augment the quality, several commissions have
been constituted, including Radhakrishnan, Kothari, Rastogi and the recent-most
NKC. According to the latter, there is need to transform existing institutions and
thus has outlined some essential steps: universities should restructure/revise
curriculum at least once in three years; annual examinations should be
supplemented with continuous internal assessment (25%); research must be encouraged
through changes in resource allocations, reward systems and mindsets; infrastructure
that supports the teaching-learning process such as libraries, laboratories and
connectivity need to be upgraded on a regular basis and innovativeness
introduced; appointments of Vice Chancellors must be freed from direct or
indirect intervention of State governments, while Academic and Executive
Councils, which slow down decision-making process and at times constitute an
impediment to change, need to be reconsidered on a priority basis; and modernizing
higher study through national and international developments and experiences
and freeing the system from any parochial or dogmatic outlook so that
organizational management of a high order could be ensured.
As we march ahead, the Prime Minister and the Planning
Commission has rightly focused on giving due priority to higher education and
ensuring that backward regions are not deprived of the opportunities. Moreover,
new institutions and upgradation of existing ones will go a long way in
reaching education to all regions of the country as also to all sections of the
community. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
Tourism Industry:OPENING HOME TO TOURISTS, by Radhakrishna Rao,26 May 2009 |
|
|
Sunday Reading
New
Delhi, 26 May 2009
Tourism Industry
OPENING HOME TO TOURISTS
By Radhakrishna Rao
The concept of home stay is slowly
but surely gaining popularity in the tourism industry. It could be explained as
a fall out of the cultural and ecological degradation associated with the
conventional sightseeing and leisure industry. Not only is home stay more
affordable in comparison to an accommodation in a rated hotel, but exerts less
pressure on the environment around. Besides, it also makes for a far more
enjoyable and memorable experience.
According to industry wizards, the
concept of home stay is rapidly catching up in India and is becoming popular with
both the domestic and international tourists. With business looking good, by
the end of the year, a big tourist company is planning to bring in around 1,000
houses across the country into the “home stay” network. The concept will offer
a unique package of a vast range of activities ranging from yoga, ayurvedic
treatments and massages, backwater rafting in Kerala to exploring tiger trails
in Periyar tiger reserve.
In the gorgeously beautiful Kodagu (formerly
known as Coorg) district of Karnataka, known for its magnificent mountain
ranges, bubbling water streams and flourishing coffee plantations and orange
orchards, many enterprising coffee planters, who have inherited ethnically
vibrant traditional houses, have entered into the home stay business in a big
way by making use of their assets.
Similarly, in the historically-vibrant
north-western Rajasthan, former princely rulers dotting this desert State have
converted their sprawling and beautiful palaces and residences into
heritage home stays. Not to be left behind “God’s Own Country” as the ever-green
Kerala is known in the tourist blurb has popularised the home stays in a big
way by falling back on the bounties of nature.
Significantly, many small farmers in
the hilly Waynad, in northern part of Kerala have taken to home stay following
crop failures in the region. In fact, the extra income they now earn has helped
them see through the bad days. The popularisation of home stay here is thanks
to the sustained efforts’ made by local non-profit organization called Uravu,
which in Malaylam stands for spring.
As part of its plan Uravu has
adopted a village, Thrikkaipet, where farmers are being encouraged to convert a
part of their houses for home stay “Our
aim is to make the village a self- sustaining one as through home stays, a
large part of the income goes to the locals. A visitor here will be the guest
of the village” says Uravu’s T. Sivraj. Significantly, tourists from Europe
including Italy, Switzerland, Germany
and France
have merged as patrons of home stays in this non-descript village in the
mountainous north Kerala.
Way back in 2002, the ice-covered
Ladakh entered the home stay map with the active encouragement of California-based
Snow Leopard Conservancy, an organisation that strives for conservation of
natural resources through the active involvement of the local community. Before
home stay was introduced, tourists used to travel to Leh and make day trips to
Ladakh. However, with the home stay gaining in popularity, travelers to this
once forbidden icy region can explore the ravishing beauty of the region by
going in for home stays. And for the local population the change is more than
welcome as it implies additional income from a booming tourism industry.
In Palghat district of Kerala, known
as the rice bowl of the State, many traditional houses standing in the midst of
flourishing paddy fields have been converted into home stays which offer local
culinary delights and cultural programmes for both the Indian and foreign
tourists. Similarly, a once unknown island village off Kochi
in Central Kerala has become a thriving
tourist destination following the introduction of Home stay.
Interestingly, local fishermen in
the village of Kumbalangi run home stays with a high
degree of professional acumen. These home stays offer not only local delicacies,
but also an insight into the local way of living and culture. Initially, the
locals were skeptical of tourism, but it has clicked, according to the Great
Indian Tourism Planners and Consultants International.
Apparently, even well-heeled
tourists who normally prefer to stay in star hotels are now plumping for home
stays, for “the heck of it”. A spokesperson of the travel and leisure industry says
that home stay has now become one of the biggest crowd pullers, making it one
of the most dynamic sector of the travel industry. Home stays were earlier
popular with foreign tourists but nowadays there has been a huge interest
evinced even by Indians too” says Mayura Balasubramaniam, a project support
officer for tourism programme with the United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP). The UNDP has tied up with Tourism Ministry to promote rural tourism in
36 villages across 20 States.
Apparently, home stays vary from the
so-called basic home stays with a rural family or a tribal hamlet for Rs.100 a
night to luxury or heritage stays within havelis, mansions or plantations and
estates, the charge for which is anything above Rs 5000. In addition, there are
around 10,000 home stays with an environmental theme.
The benefits of home stays clearly
include staying with the locals (owners of the property), eating local cuisine
and taking part in various traditional and cultural activities including
mehandi artistry and weaving coil baksets etc. As of now, Kerala, Karnataka,
Himachal Pradesh and Rajasthan are in the forefront of popularizing home stays
in the country. The change is also an indication that these days most urban
middle class and upper class Indians are aware and well-traveled. They want to
experience their own country.
The bewitching beautiful Indonesian island of Bali, known for its magnificent Hindu
temples and ravishingly beautiful beaches promoted home stays in a big way in the
90s, following an outcry over the negative cultural and environmental fall out
of the traditional tourism.
Despite the global recession and
fear of terrorist attacks, home stays in the country are moving from strength-to-strength.
Kerala is one such example. The Indians go there mainly during October, April, May
and December. And, surprisingly, the tourist industry there saw more than
double the number of domestic tourists, after Mumbai mayhem. Not surprisingly
then the Tourism department of Kerala as part of its plan to promote
responsible tourism in the stay is encouraging the home stays in a big way. ---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
| | << Start < Previous 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 Next > End >>
| Results 4816 - 4824 of 5984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|