|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Groups’ Appeal:CUT BARRIERS ON GREEN GOODS, by Dr P K Vasudeva, 16 November 2009 |
|
|
Events & Issues
New
Delhi, 16 November 2009
Trade
Groups’ Appeal
CUT
BARRIERS ON GREEN GOODS
By Dr P K
Vasudeva
General Electric, the iconic US-based multinational technology and
services conglomerate, has called the governments to cut tariffs and other
barriers to trade in environmental goods and services in order to help combat
climate change.
The WTO members should strike an ‘environmental goods and services
agreement’ (EGSA) without waiting for a broader deal in the long-running Doha
Round of trade negotiations, according to Thaddeus Burns, GE’s senior counsel
for intellectual property and trade.
In a paper presented in October last at the conference on trade, energy,
and the environment, Burns argued that tariffs and domestic purchasing
requirements on products like wind turbines and solar panels increase the cost
of clean energy investments, undermining governments’ efforts to cut greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions.
Liberalising trade in environmental goods and services is one of the
many issues under consideration in the Doha
negotiations. However, with a broad multilateral trade deal nowhere in sight
after nearly eight years of negotiations, Burns said, “it is time for
governments to make a firm commitment to reducing the costs they impose on
EGS.” He rejected suggestions that taking EGS liberalisation out of the
struggling negotiations would undermine the Doha Round, saying “it makes little
sense to delay action on climate-change related cost reduction.” Other business
interests, including the Washington-based National Foreign Trade Council, have
made similar appeals.
It is not without precedent in the WTO for a group of countries to agree
to cut tariffs on a particular class of goods outside the context of a trade
round. For instance, in 1997 a group of major traders enacted the Information
Technology Agreement, which cut tariffs on a wide range of products. In
principle, there is no reason why a critical mass of WTO members could not do
the same for environmental goods, a point that ICTSD and other analysts have
made for several years.
GE has an interest in seeing major markets cut tariffs on wind turbines
and other clean energy technology: it is the world’s second largest
manufacturer of wind turbines, behind Denmark’s
Vestas and ahead of Spain’s Gamesa, Germany’s
Enercon, and India’s
Suzlon. Burns’ paper noted that the majority of WTO members still levy tariffs
on wind turbines, ranging from 14 per cent in Brazil
and Mexico, to 8 percent in China and Korea,
and 2.7 and 1.3 per cent respectively in the EU and the US. Significant
tariffs also face solar panels and gas turbines: India levies duties of 15 per cent
on the former and 7.5 per cent on the latter.
Burns’ paper also pointed to non-tariff barriers that were “often even
more destructive to GHGs reduction goals and worldwide economic recovery than
traditional tariffs.” ‘Buy domestic’ requirements and other local content
restrictions in China, the US, and two
Canadian provinces were closing off opportunities to foreign suppliers. An EGSA
that addresses these non-tariff barriers would make cleaner energy technologies
cheaper, he said.
GE envisions a multi-step process for implementing an EGSA: first, a
subset of WTO members accounting for the bulk of existing trade would eliminate
tariffs on a list of products (all WTO members, not just participants, would
receive the concessions). Next, more countries could join, and coverage could
extend to more products, services, and non-tariff barriers.
The Doha Round talks on EGS liberalisation has long been blocked over
disagreements among members on which goods should be covered. And within the
framework of the round, large developing countries have jealously guarded their
freedom to choose whether to sign on to initiatives slashing tariffs across
entire industrial sectors.
This became apparent at the conference, held at the WTO headquarters,
when a senior Brazilian diplomat noted that clean-burning ethanol would deserve
to be part of an EGS deal. Ethanol, however, faces tariffs of over 40 per cent
in the EU and the US,
where ethanol producers are heavily subsidized and politically influential.
Oil, in contrast, enters duty free. “If people are serious about emissions, why
tax clean, renewable fuels while dirty, non-renewable and price-volatile oil is
admitted duty-free?” asked Flavio Damico, Brazil’s deputy ambassador to the
WTO. He observed that even measures intended to promote sustainable development
could be discriminatory.
The US
government has made proposals similar to GE’s call for an EGSA in the past. In
late 2007, just before an important UN climate conference, Washington joined hands with the EU to urge
all major economies to eliminate tariffs on a list of ‘climate-friendly’ goods
- but not ethanol. At the time, several developing countries complained
that the list did not adequately reflect products in which they had an export
interest.
Nefeterius McPherson, a spokesperson for the US
trade representative’s office, said the US “remain[ed] eager to move ahead
with negotiations to eliminate tariff barriers on climate-friendly technologies
and spur momentum on a larger WTO Doha package on environmental goods and
services.” However, she declined to comment on whether an EGS agreement should
also cut tariffs on ethanol, along with subsidies to biofuels and government
support for fossil fuel production.
A group of trade associations,
including the National Foreign Trade Council (NFTC), sent a letter to President
Obama recently urging the Administration to pursue a swift conclusion of a
comprehensive Environmental Goods and Services Agreement.
The associations wrote, “Lowering
trade barriers on green goods and services would be good for the environment
and the U.S.
economy.” Liberalizing green trade, they continued, “would help create the
green jobs that will accelerate recovery of the U.S. economy.”
While the Doha Round of WTO
negotiations is one potential forum to pursue an international agreement on
green goods and services, the associations noted, “the combined economic and
environmental benefits of an agreement warrant the exploration of alternative
or complementary efforts.”
The trade associations suggested the
Administration consider the Forum on Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)
and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as forums
to help secure interim commitments in advance of a WTO agreement.
The groups also encouraged the
President to promote the utility of lowering trade barriers on green goods and
services in international environmental forums, including the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Major Economies Forum.
The letter also underscores the importance of protecting intellectual property
rights in green technologies with respect to stimulating American innovation
and creating green jobs.
Finally, the letter expresses
concern over the lack of discussion of global trade in environmentally friendly
goods and services in the House-passed American Clean Energy and Security Act
of 2009.
“Emphasizing the importance of an
environmental goods and services agreement in domestic legislation would
enhance legislative efforts to deliver clean technologies to the developing
world. We hope that you and your Administration will work with Congress to
generate clear signals of support for lower trade barriers, which can help to
reinforce a positive message on lowering green tariffs to the international
community,” the associations concluded.
The countries both developed and developing should, therefore must
commit to reduce trade barriers on environmental goods and services in the
future Doha Round talks to save the planet.---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
World Eyes India:KEY TO GLOBAL RECOVERY, by Shivaji Sarkar,11 November 2009 |
|
|
Economic Highlights
New
Delhi, 11 November 2009
World Eyes India
KEY TO GLOBAL RECOVERY
By Shivaji Sarkar
India has emerged as one of the most
resilient economies. Whether it would be able to lead the world or not has been
rocking the discussions at India Economic Summit. There are some positives and
some negatives in the process.
The world is looking up to India for more
than one reason. Despite its close trade, business and to a large extent
financial – rupee-rouble alliance, the country did not succumb to the pressures
created by the fall of the Soviet Union. In
1997-98, it withstood the pressures of the South-East Asian crisis with equal
élan. The 2008 Lehman Brother scandal-led global recession did not hit it
gravely.
The economy of the country may not
be as large as that of the US
or many European countries, but what surprises the international experts is its
capacity to insulate against odds that hit and often devastate major economies such
as those of the Soviet Union or the US.
India’s mixed economy – government-owned socialist ideology
dictated public sector and capitalist ideology based private sector – has
emerged as the greatest strength. If one dithers even a bit, the other comes to
the rescue of the system. The government is not actively involved in the day-to-day
functioning of industries or business but it acts as an effective benign
intervener or regulator.
The World Economic Forum associate
director Michele Petochi on his approach to Global Redesign Initiative says,
“The challenge is to have a compelling approach to complex problems”. This is
where India
is expected to give cue to the world’s complex economic system.
It has also emerged as a country
that generates credible statistics unlike that of China. In the latest edition of the
London-based Legatum Institute’s Prosperity Index, India
is beating China.
The Index processing data for 104 countries puts India
at the 45th rank and China
at 75th rank. Last year, India
was a lowly 70th and China
54th. The index is now broad-based to include how citizens in a
country feel about personal freedom, institutional maturity and mutual trust.
The parameter for India
is increasing.
So would India be able to come up
again with the same kind of resilience in the latest IMF-predicted mother of all
meltdowns in emerging markets, a crash that would make the 2008 one look like a
pigmy?
In such a situation Prime Minister’s
announcement to withdraw stimulus package next year would be a help or
hindrance also needs to be debated. But if the Reserve Bank of India is to be
believed, the earlier the package is withdrawn it would be wise and good news for
the economy. Some economists say that autonomous institutions like the RBI have
helped the country take the right decisions and create the necessary resilience.
If banks did not collapse in the wake of the Lehman scandal, the credit goes to
the RBI and its allied organizations like SEBI, NABARD, and NHB.
Apparently, there is synchronization
in politics and economics. It is not always that the government listens to the RBI,
which decides on financial and economic considerations. The government acts on
broader parameters taking the people’s aspirations into account. This has
pushed India below China in the
Eurasia Group compiled Global Political Index. The index gives credit to tough
political decisions, which a monolithic China
can and India
cannot.
But this alone is not the
impediment. India
has not been found to be very competitive. It has been placed 49th
out of 133 countries in the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Index
2009-10. The country lags behind in infrastructure, health, primary education
and galloping inflation and fiscal situation prevents the government from
making the much needed investment. Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek
Singh Ahluwalia in his presentation has mentioned infrastructure as the most
important constraint.
The index says that bureaucracy,
over-regulation and corruption still affect the functioning of Indian markets.
And by global standards, the diffusion of information and communication
technologies remains very low. Union Minister for Roads and Highways Kamal Nath
accepted it in a different way saying, “We had our decade of information technology,
now let’s have our decade of infrastructure”. The lag is admitted and nobody
opposed the index.
The economic recovery is positive
with occasional industrial and services sector indices improving as it happened
in figures of August, the government tries to show. But the overall trend has
yet to mark the recovery as the quarterly results of 2000 companies reveals. It
is a pointer that shows that demand growth is still a few quarters away and the
current growth only reflects the impact of government’s stimulus packages. The
sectors that were direct beneficiaries of the fiscal stimulus -- automobiles, metals and tyres –are
witnessing a volume growth whereas others continue to lag. Overall, there is no
sign of a demand growth that can put the country back on growth trajectory
firmly.
Net sales of most companies declined
in the September analysis and are termed as the slowest quarter the corporate
in this country has witnessed in the past several years. The agriculture and
allied industries sector too has fallen back. The fall in agriculture
production is to lead to a negative contribution of 1.5 per cent to GDP growth.
The external sector is also not contributing to the growth. The exports
continue to drop to by 13.8 per cent in September this year over the drop of
34.2 per cent registered in April – 48 per cent total fall.
According to the RBI, the inflation,
which is to peak in March 2010 to 6.5 per cent, might further aggravate demand
growth issues and may make industrial products expensive. The strengthening
rupee against the dollar sends mixed signals – positive for importers and
negative for exporters.
Still hopes revolve around India. Rajat
Nag, economist at the Asian Development Bank; Kalpana Morparia, chief executive
officer of JP Morgan India; Raghuram Rajan, Professor, University of Chicago;
Shumeet Banerji, CEO, Booz and Co and Lars H Thunnel, CEO of International
Finance Corporation exuded hope on India’s long-term prospects. The underlining
issue is ‘if only India
corrects many of the impediments, including food security’.
The hopes also veer round Asian
consumers to create the next robust recovery. Management guru CK Prahlad feels
that India
has the potential given the manpower of 200 million young educated people, 500
million skilled workers and the ability to generate over 10 per cent of the
world trade in next 15 years. Indeed, there is hope. Reality may be different
but the economy –not growth – is always fuelled by hopes. India is at
least able to generate that. --INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
CPM, SP Routed:BIG TRIUMPH FOR UPA & BSP, by Insaf,12 November 2009 |
|
|
Round The States
New Delhi, 12 November 2009
CPM, SP Routed
BIG TRIUMPH FOR UPA
& BSP
By Insaf
Seven States across the country have given the latest
mandate through by-elections favouring the Congress and its ally, the Trinamool
Congress yet again, with the BSP adding greatly to the surprise. While the Left
has been humiliated in West Bengal and Kerala,
as never before, the Samajwadi Party of Mulayam Singh has lost face through an
incredible drubbing on its home turf. Indeed, results of the 31 Assembly and
one Lok Sabha byelections are carrying forward a strong message: people want a
change. Mamata’s TMC winning all the seven of the 11 seats it contested in
Bengal is signal enough for the CPM that only a miracle can help it retain its
red bastion after the next assembly poll. Likewise, the Congress wresting all
three seats in Kerala is also a clear pointer that the party is well on its way
to snatching power from the Left next poll.
In Uttar Pradesh, SP Chief Mulayam Singh Yadav, seen till
recently as a formidable force, has got a hard knock, with the Muslims ditching
“Maulana Mulayam” and largely swinging in favour of the Congress. His candidate
for the Ferozabad Lok Sabha seat, none other than his own daughter-in-law lost by
a huge margin to the Congress’ Raj Babbar. Mulayam lost even in his pocket boroughs
of Etawah and Baratna; remember he was elected to the State Assembly from
Baratana, but resigned on election in the Lok Sabha. Worse, to add insult to
injury, his bête noire Mayawati’s BSP has made a forceful comeback after its poor
showing in the recent Lok Sabha. Her party won nine of the 11 seats, proving
the time has not yet come to write her off.
* * * *
Hooda Under Watch
Haryana and Karnataka have thrown up intriguing political
developments. The Chief Ministers of the two States have been put under watch
by their respective high commands. While Bhupinder Singh Hooda may have had his
say in the formation of his ministry by keeping his main critics out, his glee
has been short lived. Delhi
has constituted a coordination committee to manage the affairs between the party
and the Government and, as such, virtually monitor Hooda’s performance. The
panel is, no doubt, headed by AICC General Secretary Prithviraj Chavan. Nevertheless,
it is co-chaired by Hooda-baiter Birendra Singh, who lost in the poll, and
includes two other rivals. All the seven Independent MLAs (six of them first
timers) have been rewarded with ministerships and posts of parliamentary
secretaries for helping Hooda muster a simple majority. Importantly, not a
single of the 10 Congress berths have gone to any of his detractors. That Hooda
has managed to get five of the six Haryana Janhit Congress MLAs to join the
Congress. A feather in his cap, which should help.
* * * *
Yeddyruppa Gets
Mixed Reprieve
Likewise in Karnataka. Chief Minister B S Yeddyruppa has successfully
weathered the fortnight-long storm raised by the dissident Reddy brothers and
other rebel MLAs’ and saved his kursi.
But the BJP central leadership is not taking any chance. It too has set up a
coordination committee to oversee the “reconciliation process” and ensure that peace
lasts. This follows the Reddy brothers, Janardhan and Karunaka, giving BJP
leader L K Advani a “birthday gift” on Saturday last in Delhi. They backed down
from their demand for a change in the State’s leadership and removal of six
Ministers after Delhi refused to oblige. However, Yeddyruppa had to yield to
some extent. The Bellary district officials have been transferred and his
“favorite” minister and special assistant removed. How long the truce will last
is anybody’s guess. Money now asserts aggressively in India’s increasingly
feudal politics!
* * * *
Ugly Start In
Maharashtra
Maharashtra, finally got a Government last Saturday after a
fortnight of bitter wrangling between the Congress and the NCP over the number
of ministerial berths and portfolios. While the ruling alliance has overcome the
hurdle of meeting the November 3 deadline of government formation or else risk
Governor’s rule, it has been an unsavoury start. Not only has it brought to the
fore the one-upmanship tussle between the two old partners but, more
importantly, that Ashok Chavan’s government must rein in Raj Thackeray’s MNS.
On Monday last the Assembly got off to a violently shameful start after four
MNS MLAs slapped and manhandled Samajwadi legislator Abu Asim Azmi in the House
for taking oath in Hindi and not in Marathi as per the MNS diktat. While the
MNS MLAs have been punished with a severe suspension of four years, Mumbai
witnessed violent skirmishes between the MNS-SP supporters. Worse may follow.
Will the new government show much-needed spine and finally take on Raj Thackeray?
* * * *
MNS Version in
Madhya Pradesh?
Enough should normally be enough. But look who was seen
following in Raj Thackeray’s footsteps. Incredibly enough, Madhya Pradesh Chief
Minister, Shivraj Singh Chauhan! Last week he sent shock waves with his reported
utterance that his Government would not tolerate industries employing Biharis
and that private firms must train and give jobs to the locals! Expectedly, the BJP’s
alliance partner in Bihar, JD (U) was up in arms. Describing the utterances as
“unconstitutional and objectionable”, Chief Minister Nitish Kumar shot off a
letter saying “every Indian has the fundamental right to seek employment
anywhere in the country… If Bihar refuses to consume Madhya Pradesh’s products,
won’t the industries in your State be hit…” RJD chief Lalu Prasad too hit out
saying the BJP “will lose whatever little support base it has in Bihar”.
Warning enough for Chauhan to wisely retract the next day by declaring: “Madhya
Pradesh is open to everybody. Anyone can come from the other States and work
here.” Mercifully, he did not foolishly stick
out like Raj.
* * * *
Dalai Visits Tawang
Tawang in Arunachal Pradesh was all decked up this past week
as if Loshar, the Tibetan New Year, had come before time. Hundreds of monks
thronged the district dressed in their traditional attire with flowers, khadas
(white scarves) and lamps to welcome His Holiness the Dalai Lama on Sunday
last. He had come to Tawang for the first time 50 years ago while fleeing from
the Chinese. Though the long-awaited visit was termed as “not political, but
religious and spiritual,” the Buddhist leader did make a subtle point on the
Chinese claims on Tawang, which many may have missed. The PLA occupied Tawang during
the 1962 war, he said. “But the Chinese government declared a unilateral ceasefire
and withdrew its forces. At that time it was different leadership. Now the
leadership has different views. This is something which I really don’t know. I
am a little bit surprised..,” he added. Time for the Government to pick up the
cue.
* * * *
Towards Solution Of
J&K
Encouraging signs of a solution to the Kashmir imbroglio are
slowly but surely emerging. Both the State national parties and the separatists
seem to be thinking along similar lines. Participating in a seminar in Delhi,
People’ Democratic Party’s Mehbooba Mufti candidly stated that “differences
between the mainstream political parties and the separatists had blurred and
there seemed a fair amount of consensus on the Kashmir issue.” On its part, the
ruling National Conference has clarified that the party “is willing to work
with the opposition PDP, the Hurriyat Conference and the separatists groups to
evolve a common solution.” Fortunately, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, chairman of the moderate
faction of the Hurriyat Conference, on Friday last also expressed the
conglomerate’s “readiness for meaningful talks with the Centre.” He said “participation
of India, Islamabad, Muzaffarabad (capital of Pak Occupied Kashmir) and the people
of Kashmir was imperative for a solution.” Guess, it’s time for the Centre to
come out with a concrete and lucid plan. --INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|
|
Rising Divorce Cases:EROSION OF INDIAN FAMILY, by Dhurjati Mukherjee, 9 November 2009 |
|
|
Sunday Reading
New Delhi, 9 November 2009
Rising
Divorce Cases
EROSION
OF INDIAN FAMILY
By
Dhurjati Mukherjee
It is a well-known fact that over the years the
concept of the family has changed. Nowadays, the husband, wife and children
constitute the family, which was not the case two decades back. Worse, even
this family has become unsustainable and reports of marital discord have
increased over the years. The underlying forces of change have been giving a
new meaning to the causes of disharmony.
It is not that conflict, for example, due to
incompatible personalities did not exist earlier. But the fact is that it has
become more vibrant and open. Factors such as incompatibility of personalities
have existed in the past but what is new is that the tolerance threshold has
become fragile. Moreover, tension coupled with egos of individuals has
accentuated the personality clash, sometimes resulting in serious discords. The
clash of personalities has resulted in families breaking up and couples going
in for divorce or mutual separation.
The self dependence of women and their awareness
about rights have given rise to a new situation. Those who are employed or are
financially dependent find it difficult to tolerate the traditional dominance
of the male member and are in a position to take care of themselves without
having to fall back on their parents, as in the past. All these factors have led to an increase in the
divorce rate or separation primarily in the cities and urban centres.
According to a study by a Mumbai-based legal
activist, the family courts witnessed 2055 couples filing for divorce in 1995
in the city with the number going up to 3400 in 2004. Presently the number may
be not less than 5000. Similarly, in the sight of the matrimonial district
courts of Delhi,
an average of 25 divorce petitions were filed every day in 2004. In Kolkata,
the number has gone up from 1633 in 1966 to around 2400 in 2003 and may well be
over 4000 presently. It would be pertinent here to mention that because of the increasing
number of young couples resorting to divorce, six more family courts have come
up in Delhi since the late 90s to deal with a whopping 9000 cases of
matrimonial disputes.
Analyzing the various causes of such disputes,
it is generally believed that the three most important factors are: personality
related behaviours/tendencies, including deficiencies – sexual or otherwise; unfulfilled
material/monetary gains from, incompatibility, and lastly a superiority
complex. Cases of separate living or divorce are more pronounced where the
female member is assertive and employed.
There have been reports of the husband
suspecting his wife for alleged close or even sexual relations with a
colleague. While in some cases the allegations are true, there are many
instances where the allegations are baseless. Similarly, a working wife would
not tolerate her husband returning late at night and having any sort of
intimacy with any of his colleague. The clash of personalities in such types of
cases is very frequent and normally friends or relatives mediate to settle the
problems, keeping in view the future of children that the couple may be having.
Husbands normally want to dominate their wives
and would not tolerate their having intimacy with any male friend. While these
problems are more pronounced in the metros and amongst the upper middle class
or the upper echelons of society, the nature of the crisis differs among the
lower middle class and the economically weaker sections, where alcoholism and
gambling is a major factor.
In cases, the couple is issueless, the end
result is divorce. A woman cannot be divorced because she is infertile, as per
law, as there are alternative methods of procreation as well as adoption
available to the couple. However, in Muslim Personal Law, a wife’s barrenness
is a major ground for divorce if a husband wishes it to be so. Similarly, Islam
also allows a woman to divorce her husband if male infertility can be proven.
Reports of female private tutors having sexual
relations with the student’s father are well known. On the other hand, women or
girls, who manage the family as both the husband and wife are employed, have
been reported to have consensual sex with the male member. Many families do not
like to keep young girls because the wife suspects the loose character of her
husband.
With modernization of society, it is quite
apparent that tolerance and acceptability in the human individual would
gradually decrease. Moreover, attraction towards worldly objects would create
greater problems in man-woman relationship. With more and more women getting
employed – whether in corporate houses or in the unorganized sector – they
would tend to become more assertive in the family, more so if their income is
on the same levels as that of her husband. This would create more tension and
eventually lead to marital discord and may end up in divorce or separation.
One has to accept the fact that just because two
individuals have married, their thinking, mindsets and behavioural patterns cannot
be expected to be similar, more so if they are educated. It naturally takes
time to know and understand each other. The understanding, which will
eventually result in compatibility can develop only gradually and thus, both
have to accommodate the viewpoint and thinking of the other partner till then.
The essence of marriage is the ‘understanding’
of each other’s compulsions, which if lacking between couples, could spell
trouble in form of increase in family disputes and eventually lead to divorce.
In the coming year, there is a growing fear that the institution of the marriage
may, end up in ‘live-together’ relationships, where separation would become
much easier and not entail any legal hiccups. There was a time when sex and
procreation was the sole aim of marriage, but now this is possible even without
formal tie-ups.
Though counseling centres have mushroomed around
cities in particular and psychologists have been making efforts to bring about
rapprochement, the results are not very satisfactory. Arrogance and lack of
understanding are obviously the prime reasons. However, women’s organizations
say that more understanding has to be shown by the male member and his (as also
his family’s) domination in all matters has to end as with changing times
assertion of rights of the opposite sex is quite natural.
Indeed, it is difficult to project the future
existence of the nuclear family, but the sociological problems need to be thoroughly
examined. If in a family, the tradition of love and affection yields to
arrogance, suspicion and jealousy, it would have adverse affect in the child’s
growth and thinking process. Worse, it would jeopardize social values and
relationships.--INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
Koda’s Millions, Manu’s Parole:WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL, YAAR,by Poonam I Kaushish,14 November 2009 |
|
|
Political Diary
New Delhi, 14 November 2009
Koda’s Millions, Manu’s Parole
WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL, YAAR
By Poonam I Kaushish
Phew? It has been a busy season keeping
track of the garam-garam-teekha-teekha
horrifying tamashas of the poweratti. Wherein our netas have not only cleverly perfected
the art of self-deception but scaled new heights of corruption, rule by law and capture of power by pelf.
After all darlings, it has everything to do with the power of politics and the
politics of power!
Nothing illustrates this better than
the political nautanki and stench of
money in four States. In Jharkhand Madhu Koda is under the CBI scanner for
amassing over Rs 4000 crores in all of two years as Chief Minister. In
Karnataka, we stood witness to the BJP Chief Minister Yedurappa’s unholy surrender
before the mine-rich Reddy brothers. In Maharashtra
the delayed swearing-in of the Congress-NCP Ministers thanks to a tussle over
which Party should control the lucrative purse-strings of Home, PWD and Power
with a total budget of over Rs 60,000 crore is testimony of money seeking to
determine who would rules the State. And the postponed Cabinet expansion in
Haryana which hefty trade-offs written all over it.
More, that our laws are far removed
the paper they are written on. Nowhere is this better reflected than in the
ease with which Manu Sharma, son of senior Haryana Congress leader Vinod Sharma
managed to get parole for two months within a few years of being convicted of
murdering the model Jessica Lal in 1999 for refusing to serve drinks. Worse,
that the way parole was granted made a mockery of justice.
Take Koda, who found himself as CM despite
being an independent MLA minted money by trading his signature for issuing
mining licenses. How many in poor asli
Bharat have even heard of Dubai, Mauritius and Liberia, in which Koda stashed away
millions of US dollars. True like his
elk before him, Koda is innocent until he is proven guilty and law will take
its own course. So confident is he that he will come up trumps that he has
nominated his wife to fight the poll. Once again underscoring that politics is
the last refuge of scoundrels!
Significantly, if Koda made his millions
after coming to politics, the Reddy brothers in Karnataka used their monies to
direct politics. They sought a change in the State's leadership on the grounds
that their business interests were not being furthered under Yeddurappa. Not
only that. They wanted the entire Bellary
administration revamped and their projects cleared fast. So strong was the force
of the mining magnates money power that Yeddurappa and the BJP buckled under. A
weeping CM went on TV had to say he would change his ways! A horrific moment in
media history.
Coming to the Jesical Lal saga of how
the mighty get away with even murder. It has now been established that rules
were bent when Manu Sharma, who is serving a life sentence for the murder of
Jessica was given parole on three grounds: To participate in the religious
rites of his late grandmother, attend to his ‘ailing mother’ and tend to the
family business. Never mind, that his granny died a year ago, his ‘ailing
mother’ was seen heartily addressing a press conference on the State’s women’s
cricket team and his business interests
being well-attended to. Compounding this, he was spotted at two Delhi
night-clubs.
Shockingly, while the Delhi police turned down Manu’s plea for parole, the Delhi
Government cleared his request in unseemly haste based on the Chandigarh police report. That too, after the
Supreme Court had rejected Manu’s petition for bail on similar grounds. Further,
Tihar Jail inmates have filed a petition with the Delhi High Court, alleging
that parole is being given only to the influential and seeking transparency in
the process. This year, out of 132 applications for parole from prisoners in
Tihar, only 11 were approved. Despite a Court directive that parole
applications be processed quickly it takes more than 8-10 months to decide most
cases. Manu’s was done in days. Needless to say, Congress ka haath khaas criminal ke saath hai!
What’s new? Aren’t we accustomed to
an immoral, corrupt, criminal and unaccountable polity who could stoop to
anything for paisa and gaddi. Wherein scams no longer shocks, worry
anyone or causes mass protests. Don’t we know that there is something rotten in
the State of Denmark. With unscrupulous manipulators emerging as the new rulers
--- of politico-criminals, feudal lords and power dons. Shrugged off as a price
one has to pay for democracy
What troubles one is the new
dimension to this age-old malaise. That it does not strike any chord among our
leaders who have reduced graft to a farcical political pantomime. Most
distressing is that there is no longer any sense of outrage or shame even when
caught red handed. Corruption today is naked, unashamed, and brazen. Nowadays,
they conveniently wash their hands off by calling corruption a “systemic
failure.” Or cursorily dismiss it as one of the ‘unlisted’ perks of their jobs.
Are they kidding? No, in plain English, they are damn serious.
Tragically, the downslide has been rapid. With
every passing year and election, the barometer of corruption and immorality has
steadily risen. Worse, our netagan neither
want to change or be accountable. Not even to God. Transparency is a far cry.
Accustomed as there are to being a law
unto themselves. The tragedy is that the private face of our netas is ugly. It wins hands down over
their public mask. One hand washes the other.
The proud founders of Power &Money
India Limited ---- dream merchants of power and the money that goes with
it. Liberally interspersed with malice,
selfishness, greed for money, back-stabbing and coarse language. The most
enterprising and lucrative industry in India today. A lethal dhanda which has ensnared a captive
people.
Look at the benefits. One, money power
greatly adds to their political clout. Two, parties put up the moneyed to
strengthen their own hands. This works on the premise --- that you scratch my
back and I yours. Three, money-power comes in handy to settle scores with opponents
and use them for partisan political ends. So far so good. But when governance
and power demand at least outward projections of piety, morality, goodness et al they don their public mukhota and drone endlessly about
eradicating this scourge. All talk, no action. Remember, politics is all about
sounding good.
One can go on and on about hedonism
in the year gone by. Of scams which have been reduced to one-day cricketing
wonders. And argue that the rules of the game have got changed recklessly
without a thought to the future and a premium put on criminality and
immorality. But the moot point is: Will profligacy be allowed to become the
bedrock of our Parliamentary democracy? Basically, is it good for our democracy
to have such people represent the voters? When those who are supposed to lead
become saboteurs, it is time to call a spade a spade. Above all, we need
politicians who are men of conscience, integrity and credibility. Not comrades
in crime.
In sum, the aam aadmi is damn sick of political corruption and want accountability,
honesty and transparency. Else, he will be justified in concluding that all
talk of eradicating corruption by out netagan
is nothing more than shameless hypocrisy and a Himalayan humbug! Is he
asking for too much?---- INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
|
More...
-
Getting Away With Murder:ALL IT TAKES IS MONEY& POWER, by Poonam I Kaushish,25 February 2006
-
The Increasing Malaise:POLITICS OF PAISA AND CRIME!, by Poonam I Kaushish,April 20 2007
-
Nagging Boundary Issue:LOOK AT HISTORY, BE OBJECTIVE, by P K Nigam,9 November 2009
-
Man-Made Disasters:TAKE PRECUTIONS, SAVE A FORTUNE, by Shivaji Sarkar,6 November 2009
| << Start < Previous 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 Next > End >>
| Results 4663 - 4671 of 5987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|