|
|
|
|
|
|
Poll Law In Myanmar:YET ANOTHER SHAM EXERCISE?, by Syed Ali Mujtaba,6 April 2010 |
|
|
Events & Issues
New Delhi, 6 April 2010
Poll Law In Myanmar
YET ANOTHER SHAM
EXERCISE?
By Syed Ali Mujtaba
The scene is finally set for the holding of the long-awaited
2010 elections in Myanmar,
with the announcement of the Political Parties Registration Bylaw. While some
groups are registering parties, many existing opposition parties remain
undecided.
The parties neither have the leisure of debating the
legality of the Constitution nor the electoral laws since they have to register
within 60 days of the announcement of the Bylaw. Therefore, any decisions will
need to be taken quickly if they want to compete, and at the same time, the
parties would need to focus on what will constitute their election manifestos.
At least seven political groups are now preparing to
register with the Election Commission. These include: the National Unity Party
(NUP) formerly the Burmese Socialist Programme Party, the Democratic Party
(DPM), the Union of Myanmar National Political Force, the 88 Generation
Students Union of Myanmar, the Union Solidarity and Development Association
(USDA), backed by the SPDC.
The government-backed USDA and some of its allied parties
have been allowed to campaign extensively for over a year, much prior to the
promulgation of the election laws. It is learnt that a prominent Shan political
leader, Shwe Ohn is also planning to contest the elections.
The Kachin State Progressive Party (KSPP) led by Dr Manam
Tuja, former leader of the Kachin Independence Organization (KIO) is entering
the electoral fray with the requisite 15 Central Committee members and a
minimum of 500 party members in the State. The party is now preparing to
register itself within the 60 days and its leaders have promised to work for
the progress and development of education, health and the social status of the Kachin
nationals.
The Democratic Party-Myanmar (DPM) headed by veteran
politician U Thu Wai along with few alliance partners is gearing up to contest
the forthcoming elections, thanks to this new byelaw. Though it has been working
towards forming a political party since the last year-end to join the electoral
fray, it couldn’t do so officially till this recent announcement.
A group of Chin politicians are now preparing to participate
in the general elections. It maybe recalled that in the 1990 elections, Chin
State was divided into 13 constituencies and the Chin National League for
Democracy (CNLD) won four seats, Zomi
National Congress (ZNC) won two seats,
Mara People’s Party and the National
United Party won one seat each and the National League of Democracy won four
seats in Parliament. However, as part of a crack-down by the regime on
politicians and parties, many parties including the CNLD, the ZNC and the Mara
People’s Party-(MPP) were banned. Now
Chin political activists want a new party to contest the election, which can
include all politicians in the various townships in the State.
Similarly, several prominent Karen nationals are reportedly
busy forming political parties to contest this year's general election, while
others are preparing to stand individually. Three Karen political parties were
formed at the time of the 1990 elections: the Karen State Nationals
Organization (KSNO), the Union Karen League, and the Karen National Congress
for Democracy. The KSNO won in one constituency while the National League for
Democracy (NLD) won in 10 of the 14 constituencies in the State.
The ruling Junta has issued the white ID cards used for
foreign nationals to enable the Muslim communities in the northern Arakan State
to vote in the elections. However, it’s likely that the Muslim communities in
Maungdaw and Buthidaung may vote for their Muslim leaders instead of the junta
associates. This is due to their dislike of the regime and the oppression and
discrimination of Muslims in the country.
However, Myanmar’s
biggest Opposition party, the National League for Democracy (NLD) has announced
that it would not register for the 2010 election. It is of the opinion that the
election laws are unfair and unjust. Therefore, this means that Nobel Peace
laureate Aung San Suu Kyi’s party will have no role in the military-led
political process.
The NLD is angered by the military junta’s restrictive
election laws, which bar current and former prisoners from taking part in the
process. Many NLD members are among the 2,100 political detainees in Myanmar, the
most famous being Aang San Suu Kyi. However, the party faces dissolution if it
refuses to register. Recall, that the NLD had won the last election in 1990 by
a landslide but was never allowed to rule.
Similarly, some of the Kachin, Chin and Karen nationals have
taken the decision not to take part in the election. This will allow the ruling
SPDC to disband them or take whatever necessary steps against them. However, if
the SPDC miscalculates and the ethnic ceasefire groups fight back and the
fighting intensifies, the SPDC may change its game plan and use instability as
a pretext to postpone elections indefinitely.
The election in Myanmar has been widely dismissed
as unfair. This is because while electoral laws provide for a relatively ‘free’
vote on voting day with representatives of political parties present at the
polling station, the extensive powers given to the Election Commission
effectively nullifies that ‘freedom’.
In other words, the Election Commission will pre-screen
political parties and candidates that will be allowed to run. Only those who
are not deemed ‘dangerous’ to the SPDC will be allowed to proceed to the voting
stage. At that point, the people will be ‘free’ to choose between the SPDC
candidates and those who are friendly to the regime.
Once again these measures expose the well-orchestrated
strategies of the regime and its determination to shape the outcome of the
elections. The political parties and the candidates that want to compete and
represent their constituencies will have to come up with strategies that will
not disqualify them prior to the voting day.
The reluctance of the opposition and the ethnic parties, to
participate in the elections suggest it’s a sham electoral process orchestrated
by an oppressive military regime that’s in power for nearly three decades. Additionally,
it reflects that Myanmar’s national reconciliation process leading to
democratization of the country could not be achieved without the participation
of all the ethnic groups and political parties. Obviously, hinting that all is
not well with this new election law in Myanmar. ---- INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|
|
Poverty Conundrum:POLITICIANS FAIL TO EMPATHISE, by Proloy Bagchi, 31 March 2010 |
|
|
Open Forum
New Delhi, 31 March 2010
Poverty Conundrum
POLITICIANS FAIL TO
EMPATHISE
By Proloy Bagchi
Two news items caught my attention the other day. One
contained details of a Supreme Court report recently released that sought to
redefine poverty in the country. Widening the definition of poverty, the report
authored by a former Supreme Court judge, Justice DP Wadhwa, said that every
Indian with an income below Rs. 100.00 per day should be considered as poor and
eligible for official subsidies, including 35 kgs of grains for his/her family.
Swelling the ranks of the poor, Justice Wadhwa’s benchmark
for determination of poverty would add 500 million people to the official tally
of around 250 to 300 million poor. The Wadhwa report has the potential of
acquiring the status of a statute if it is accepted by the Supreme Court after
hearings slated for this month.
One can really have no quarrel with the contention of
Justice Wadhwa. In Rs. 3000 a month a bread-winner can hardly provide shelter,
food and healthcare for his/her family, leave alone education of his/her
children in these days of high inflationary pressures, especially on the prices
of food items. No wonder, therefore, hunger and malnutrition are stalking the
country. That, of course, does not bother our politicians and that, precisely, is
what the second interesting news item I referred to indicates.
For them, the days of the rather unwelcome “austerity”,
imposed by the government in September 2009, are over. The economic downturn,
apparently, is well and truly behind us with the economy showing remarkable
buoyancy, has taken a high-growth trajectory. Hence, no more travel in the “cattle
class” by our ministers and bureaucrats. From 1st April 2010 onwards, they all
will travel in their entitled class by air which, for ministers and senior
bureaucrats, is the First, generally, with a free ticket for a companion thrown
in. Viewing the uncalled for imposition as meaningless, many politicians
accepted it grudgingly. Some others, who resisted, were made to fall in line.
Earlier, during the period of “austerity”, the ministers
gave themselves a handsome gift by way of being able to carry unlimited number
of companions in planes by business class. If ordinary MPs already enjoyed the
facility, why should ministers be denied the same? All this happened when
reports of hunger and malnutrition had sequentially been rocking the nation.
Likewise, with 60 per cent children suffering from malnutrition in Madhya
Pradesh, its legislators recently gave themselves a handsome hike in their pay
and allowances.
Indeed, our fat cat politicians are unable to empathise with
widespread poverty. The eminent agricultural scientist, Dr MS Swaminathan,
commenting recently on the paradox of grains rotting in godowns when people
went hungry, said: “Poverty does not seem to stir our conscience”. The
statement is actually directed towards the power-wielders and policy makers,
who are none other than our politicians and bureaucrats.
Be that as it may, Justice Wadhwa’s is the most recent of the
numerous past efforts made to identify the poor. After 60 years of independence,
a poverty-stricken country such as ours is yet to identify the poor Indian! The
question seems to be so complex that it has defied resolution all these years.
Estimating the incidence of poverty in India involves the use of a minimum
consumption expenditure, anchored in an average (food) energy adequacy norm of
2,400 and 2,100 kilo calories per capita per day. If one went by the criterion
of the World Bank i.e. those who survived in less than $ 1 (Rs. 46) a day, there
would be around 300 million poor Indians.
However, a recent report submitted by the committee, set up
by the Prime Minister for suggesting new methodologies for measuring poverty,
headed by Suresh Tendulkar, an eminent economist pegged the figure at 370
million. The estimates made by States based on household income further pushes
up the figure to 420 million. Further, one recalls that Arjun Sengupta, the
then Chairman of the National Commission for Enterprise in Unorganised Sector,
in his report submitted in 2007 on Conditions of Work & Promotion of
Livelihood in Unorganised Sector, showed that a staggering 836 million (about
77 per cent of the population) live on a per capita consumption of less than
Rs. 20 (less than 50 cents) a day.
According to him, one was classified as poor – below poverty
line (BPL) – if he lived in less than Rs 9 (25 cents) a day and others whose
per capita consumption was less than Rs.13 were above the poverty line (APL).
Again, the World Bank recently estimated that 80 per cent of Indians lived on
less than $ 2 (Rs. 96) a day. While $2 a day is close to Justice Wadhwa’s
estimation, the percentage of poor calculated by the World Bank is about the
same as discovered by Arjun Sengupta. Obviously, our exceptionally high
economic growth rate has had no impact on the country’s poverty.
So, the conundrum continues. Who is poor and how many like
him are there in the country is not really known. And yet, the government
spends mindboggling sums of money on poverty alleviation, which has had no
impact on the incidence of poverty. Allocations of money, grains and other
benefits for the poor seem to have disappeared into thin air.
The question has now acquired criticality with the proposed
Food Security legislation. The amount to be spent on this score would depend on
the poverty estimation chosen by the government. With the government not quite
sure of the quantum of poverty, its liabilities on the food front could go
through the roof once the bill becomes law. With a vague number of identified
poor and an inefficient and corrupt public distribution system (PDS), it would
be very ambitious of the government to fulfill its future legal obligations.
In the meantime, however, people, especially women and
children, in several tribal pockets in Orissa, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh,
Gujarat, etc, are dying of hunger and malnutrition. While hunger can be tackled
by supply of grains, tackling malnutrition is a different ball game.
Malnutrition descends from one generation to another as under-nourished mothers
go on producing under-nourished children – eventual dregs of the Indian
society. With the unavailability of a nutritious diet, the cycle continues, seemingly,
unendingly.
Uncared for and helpless, such people need the government’s
immediate attention. Forgetting about identification of the poor in cities,
towns and villages, the government needs to concentrate on the areas which are
struck by hunger and malnutrition. At least these areas and the people are
identifiable as “poverty” is writ large over them. And, they are not in
multi-millions.
Rendering help to them by way of supplying grains and a nutritious
diet and ensuring their regular supplies would be more rational than making
them dependent on a fraudulent and undependable PDS. As it is, the ‘really
poor’ have no money to buy food anyway. Besides, educating and advising them to
step out of chronic poverty by providing means to acquire economic independence
will go a long way to reduce their ranks. No legislation is required for
ensuring them food security. Isn’t this precisely what the government is meant
for? ---INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|
|
Power Projects:CAG WARNS OF GANGA DRYING, by Shivaji Sarkar,2 April 2010 |
|
|
Economic Highlights
New Delhi, 2 April 2010
Power Projects
CAG WARNS OF GANGA DRYING
By Shivaji Sarkar
A
billion people of this country needs two lakh megawatt power supply. The Prime Minister
says the nation cannot progress without this vital input. So a massive effort
is on to generate power through ethical or unethical means, even if it leads to
a massive ecological fall out and desertification of the northern plains.
In this
regard, many ridiculed the sadhus and Jagadguru Shankaracharya when they led a
massive protest during the Kumbh Mela at Haridwar demanding stoppage of
tunneling and hydro-electric projects on the Ganga and its tributaries in the Himalayas in Uttarakhand, called Devabhumi – God’s own land. The harbingers of modernization called
it a medieval action to take the country backwards.
Now a
very independent constitutional body, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG)
has come to support what the sadhus have been saying – “the Ganga
would dry up and desertify northern plains”. The CAG has stated the obvious – a
corporate-government nexus is draining both the Ganga
and the exchequer.
Remember
the protesters of the Tehri Dam built on the Bhagirathi were similarly derided.
It is possibly nobody’s case that the dam built by a private operator, almost
after a decade of its completion is yet to get filled up and is producing power
far below its stated capacity of 2400 mw. Is it a case of miscalculation or
deliberate way to mislead policy makers?
The
investments stated and the cost to the society for Tehri mega dam has not been
measured properly. The total project cost alone would be around Rs 50,000
crore. (Official documents underestimate it). It does not include the cost of
sinking the Tehri town and the 107 villages around it. It is camouflaged in the
cost of Rs 594 core in rehabilitation. The project cost also does not include
the land given to it for free.
A
report last year said that the Alaknanda that gives a picturesque ambience to
the Badarinath Valley had dried up almost five km below
the Vishnuprayag dam and the hydro-power project. This was not taken seriously.
Apparently,
the sadhus have shaken the people who matter. But few had thought that they
would be supported by the CAG. It has given an alarming warning – “there would
be no water in large stretches of the Alaknanda and the Bhagirathi river beds –
the two major tributaries of the Ganga – if
the Uttarakhand government goes ahead with 53 power projects on these two
rivers. The river bed is already dry at Shrinagar in Garhwal”.
Additionally,
it is affecting aquatic life and biodiversity. The CAG states that it might
erase many of the biodiversities. This clearly is an indirect cost to human
life. It is also threatened by a direct challenge. Many of the villages on the
banks of the rivers may face immense problems as the rivers dry up. The CAG
even fears mass migration. All this has a tremendous economic fall-out as
people would be losing their livelihood and shall be reduced to penury.
Poverty
in the area is high but life is sustainable owing to the rich biodiversity and
availability of water. If that basis is lost, the cost on the government would
directly be much more than what it might be earning from power generation.
Moreover,
there is a social cost too. The area has not been known for crimes but it is
rising now as people are finding living difficult. Crimes in modern economics are
considered a law and order problem. But what is happening in parts of
Uttarakhand is the result of a lopsided development approach. Thus, so-called
modern solutions may not be appropriate to compensate for a rich biodiversity that
Uttarakhand has. The locals complain that they are not much benefited by the
generation of power. Over 75 per cent of it is exported to Uttar Pradesh, Delhi and the northern
grid.
Somehow
development has been made synonymous with profits and corporate growth.
Uttarakhand has certainly attained that, though at a terrible cost to
sustainable development and the growth that nature had helped it. Destruction
to that basic is benefitting the few, who are depriving the area of its riches
to fill the corporate and in many cases individual coffers. Let us not reduce
Uttarakhand to the tribal areas of Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh.
The CAG
has faulted the Uttarakhand government for massive diversion of river water.
But it seems for political reasons it has not raised the issue of diverting almost
one-third of this water to Delhi.
The Uttarakhand government is a successor to the erstwhile UP government and
decisions are made by the Centre. Technically it has to take the blame for
which it had not taken a decision except to continue the projects finalised in
the 8th and the 9th plans, when the State was not born.
While
five power projects are already operational out of 53 sanctioned and under
construction, more than 200 are in the pipeline. As a result of such intense
construction of dams the report says that three to four km of the riverbed
around each project will have no water.
Importantly,
the State government needs to have a relook at its power and industrial policy.
The State is supposed to be paid Rs 5 crore annually from each power project of
above 100 mw and Rs 5 lakh if it is of less than 100 mw. It is no surprise then that most of the
projects are below 100 mw capacity. The private operators are earning a fortune
whereas the state is to earn only about Rs 2.65 crore to not more than Rs 10
crore a year.
It is
indeed a huge differential in the cost-benefit ratio. Added to this is the cost
of not only drying up of Uttarakhand but of all the riparian States through
which the Ganga flows. It should not be just
seen as an ecological disaster or desertification of the northern plains alone but
a threat to the bread basket of the country. Quantifying the losses in economic
terms is difficult. It must be measured in terms of multiple benefits that the Ganga bestows-- some seen and many not.
Therefore,
the nation needs to protect its pristine but fragile Himalayan ecology if it
wants to continue on its growth trajectory. All the States need to compensate
Uttarakhand through some annualised budgetary contributions on the promise that
it protects its pristine ecology. The survival of the fragile State ensures the
survival and sustenance not only in the northern plains but also the entire
Indian sub-continent. ---INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
US-Pak Talks: ALARMING, BUT LET’S NOT PANIC, by Monish Tourangbam,30 March 2010 |
|
|
Round The World
New Delhi, 30 March 2010
US-Pak Talks
ALARMING, BUT LET’S NOT PANIC
By Monish Tourangbam
Research Scholar, School of International
Studies, JNU
The recently-concluded US-Pakistan
Strategic Dialogue has raised many an eyebrow in the Indian strategic circles. While
one needs to be concerned as well as calculative of the new developments, it
would be immature to resort to unnecessary barrage of criticism and brickbats.
If the Pakistanis attempt, as quite evident, was to somehow convince the US to intervene
in matters pertaining to the India-Pakistan dispute, then they obviously came back
empty-handed. The American side maintained a very cautious line. The Obama
administration has made concerted efforts to cultivate increasing ties with New Delhi and appears to
be in no mood to jeopardize this intense and diverse relationship.
During the dialogue, the US came out in full support of the developmental
efforts in Pakistan
and its increasing cooperation in the fight against terrorism. However, it was categorical
that the India-Pakistan issues need to be resolved bilaterally. If the
Pakistani side re-emphasized its desire to maintain parity in certain issues of
the US-Pakistan and US-India relations, for instance in the field of civilian
nuclear cooperation, the US
reiterated the point that all bilateral relations stood on its own merit and
the trajectory of US-Pakistan relations should be weighed independent of any
other bilateral ties.
Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah
Mehmood Qureshi in the course of the dialogue stated Pakistan’s
hope that that the US would
play a “constructive” role in resolving the Kashmir
dispute and provide it with “non-discriminatory” access to energy. There are no
points for guessing that the “non-discriminatory access” plainly refers to Pakistan’s wish to strike a grand civilian
nuclear deal with the US,
similar to the one signed between New Delhi and Washington.
In both the cases, the Obama
administration has not given any indication that it seriously takes heed of the
Pakistani wish. New
Delhi has maintained a policy that seeks to resolve the Kashmir issue on a bilateral basis and concentrates on
countering Pakistan-based cross-border terrorism. Lately, the Islamist
anti-India militant organisations such as the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and the Jaish-e-Mohammad
(JeM) at a conference held in Kotli, a district along the Line of Control (LoC)
in Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir (PoK) rejected the India-Pakistan talks and
instead projected jihad as the only way to liberate Kashmir from what they call
“Indian occupation”.
India is overtly critical of any hint of
external intervention in this dispute and the Obama administration is very
clear about this policy stand. As such, a deliberate effort was made to steer
clear of any inciting undue criticism at this juncture on this delicate issue. Commenting
on the case of the India-Pakistan water dispute, the US Secretary of State,
Hillary Clinton, opined that the US knew that an agreement existed between the
two South Asian countries and that contentious matters should be resolved on a
bilateral basis.
“Where there is an agreement, as
there is between India and Pakistan on water, with mediation techniques,
arbitration built in it, it would seem sensible to look to what already exists,
to try to resolve any of the bilateral problems between India and Pakistan.” She was all hopeful and
sought to indicate America’s
desire to assist on any water resource development in Pakistan as
long as it was purely domestic in nature, and she did not support unnecessarily
complicating the issue by connecting it to external matters (read broader
India-Pakistan rivalry).
It was made clear that the US wanted the US-Pakistan Strategic dialogue to
serve as a means to appraise US-Pakistan ties and its cooperation in Afghanistan, and not as a platform to discuss
India-Pakistan dispute and as an instrument to showcase Pakistan’s
displeasure of US-India engagement.
Even Richard Holbrooke, US Special
Representative to Pakistan
and Afghanistan commented
that the US
administration did not see a role for itself in India-Pakistan disputes unless
called upon by both countries. Earlier, he also made efforts to reassure Indian
strategic circles by emphasising that the US
also had strategic dialogue with India,
that they were bilateral in nature and that the current one with Pakistan was certainly not at the expense of India or any
other country.
As far as Pakistan’s
wish for a broad-based civilian nuclear deal with the US is concerned, at this juncture there is no
need for India
to panic and it would be wrong to blow critical trumpets on the issue. Washington seems to be in no mood to consider such a
grand venture with Pakistan
in the near future. Moreover, Pakistan
has a shoddy record when it comes to non-proliferation, with the father of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons programme, Abdul
Qadeer Khan, having disclosed selling nuclear technology to countries like Iran, North Korea
and Libya.
At his end, Qureshi seemed to be
harping on nuclear cooperation, reiterating Pakistan’s wish to have what he
called “non-discriminatory” access to energy clearly signifying the desire of
parity with the India-US deal, a culmination of long negotiations and
dialogues. It is also worth remembering that India also had to take arduous
diplomatic pains to get pass the 46 nation Nuclear Suppliers Group waiver and a
safe pass from the US Congress. But as is evident, Washington has been vague at best regarding
this.
Indeed, Clinton sidestepped questions on the issue
except to say that the Obama administration was prepared to discuss
"whatever issues" the Pakistani delegation raised. She seemed to
support more specifically prospects for American assistance to increasing the
efficiency of more immediate steps towards harnessing energy resources in Pakistan. Bruce
Riedel, a former CIA analyst and now with the Brookings Institution said: “There
will be some horse-trading. We owe them helicopters but I would be very
surprised if we gave them anything on the nuclear front.”
There are some serious concerns in India concerning the pumping of military aid
into Pakistan and the supply
of high-tech weapons that New Delhi fears will
be diverted towards building Pakistani arsenal against India. Pakistan sent a
56-page wish list ahead of the talks, asking for more helicopters and pilotless
drones, all in the name of fighting insurgents in the Pakistan-Afghanistan
border. The US has provided
F-16 fighter jets to Islamabad and Pakistan's Navy chief was in Washington
recently to discuss the handover in August of a refurbished U.S. frigate,
the USS McInerney. Moreover, non-military aid has also flowed into Pakistani
coffers and in the absence of a transparent mechanism to track the use of this
supposedly benign currency, New Delhi
has reason to be worried.
President Obama increasingly seems
to consider Afghanistan as
the litmus test of his administration’s foreign policy report card and in the
process has become more dependent on Islamabad.
Pakistan is indeed an
important frontline State and its assistance is inevitable if peace and
stability is to be restored in neighbouring Afghanistan. But at the same time too
much reliance on the Pakistani military and its intelligence runs the risk of history
repeating itself. Over-dependence on these entities in the past has led to the
strengthening of fundamentalism and jihadi groups in the region. Unaudited
reliance on these Pakistani establishments smacks of a historical blunder that
would lead to another tragedy for the region and the international community.
And this time around, history might repeat itself as a catastrophe.--INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
Aaj Ke Netas:HAVE BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS, by Poonam I Kaushish, 3 April 2010 |
|
|
Political Diary
New Delhi, 3 April 2010
Aaj Ke Netas
HAVE BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS
By Poonam I Kaushish
In
a sad reflection of our political times, it’s been a week when inanities and trivia consumed our
polity. An acerbic tu-tu-mein-mein of
one-upmanship played between motor-mouthed smart alec aaj ke netas who revelled
in idiocy, defended the indefensible, justified the unjustifiable and derided
institutions and high posts. All to score petty points against each other.
Ignoring that at some point all have blood on their hands. Serious substantive
issues of governance can wait.
If ten days ago it was over kissa Mayawati ka mayajaal, followed by Mulayam’s cheap sexist remark that
reservation for women would lead to businessmen wives in Parliament where people
would whistle at them, this
week’s fracas is over Bollywood icon and Gujarat tourism brand ambassador Amitabh
Bachchan presence at the Mumbai sea-link inauguration which snow-balled into a
full-blown media hogging controversy.
In a telling
defensive response, Congressmen obsessed with the ‘more
loyal than the King’ syndrome of obeisance to the First Family, first distanced
themselves and then attacked Bachchan. Why? Because the star once close friends
with the Gandhi’s had now fallen out. While Maharashtra Congress Chief Minister Ashok Chavan pleaded
his ignorance over Bachchan’s invite, Party spokespersons
compounded the folly with an incredible explanation: The actor was endorsing Gujarat led by BJP’s Narender Modi who was the “maut ka saudagar” of the 2002 pogram. Averred
they, “Does Amitabh condemn Modi’s role in the riots or endorses it?”
Matter didn’t end there. Chavan preponed
his visit to a literary programme in Pune to avoid bumping into the celebrated
actor again. Almost on cue, posters of his son Abhishek were removed from an event in the Capital
where Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit was present. Followed by a Union Minister
cancelling a public engagement to evade coming face to face with him. Next, the
Commonwealth Games Chairman and Congress MP Kalmadi ruled out naming Bachchan
the games brand ambassador.
Modi, on his part, invoked Gujarati
pride and came up with an equally outlandish criticism, dubbing the Congress,
the “Taliban of untouchability” for hounding Bachchan. Even as the aam aadmi
wonder what’s the big deal if Bachchhan fell out with the Gandhi’s, given that
he is a brand ambassador of many products because as a successful star
his name sells.
What’s
wrong if he promotes Gujarat tourism? As a
proud Bharatvasi doesn’t he have the
democratic right to endorse a State? It
does not mean he is holding a brief for Modi or his brand of politics. Why
should any reference to Gujarat be seen through the prism of the 2002 riots? Will the Congress stop doing business with the
Ambani’s and Tata’s because their industries are based in Gujarat? Stop buying
the Nano, Vimal textiles and Amul products because they are out of Gujarat?
What
does the Congress have to say for the 1984 Sikh riots in Delhi which left over
3000 dead. And Rajiv’s Gandhi’s chilling cold-blooded statement: “When a big
tree falls, the earth shakes.” Aren’t we familiar with are criminal-politcos
with their “bullet-proof vests.” The neta-police nexus. Is the Congress any
different from the Shiv
Sena or MNS which attacked Sachin Tendulkar for asserting that Mumbai belongs
to all Indians?
Tragically, the irrational and frivolous outpourings over
Bachchan underscore the ugly truth: Rajniti
today has been reduced to a political charade. Substance is elusive, if it
is there at all. Wherein all stand equally guilty. A politics of I-me-myself.
All willy-nilly playing ducks and drakes with governance and issues which have
a bearing on our daily lives. For the polity issues like garibi hatoa, providing roti,
kapada aur maakan and bijli, sadak,
paani are mere slogans to ride the crest of the popularity wave during
polls. Not serious matters
Instead
of wasting their energy on Modi, why aren’t are leaders debating issues like
the increasing threat of Maoists who have encompassed 13 States, the rising insurgency
in the North-East which is worse than Kashmir, skyrocketing prices and run-away
inflation. Why hasn’t the Congress put Delhi CM on the mat for burdening the aam janata with more taxes because her
Government wasted three precious years in getting its act together for the
14-day Commonwealth Games.
Forget Brand India, see Asli Bharat which is in the grip of the
Bolangir-Kalahandi syndrome – hunger, poverty and suicides. According to the
Global Hunger Index 2010 recently released, India is placed at the 66th spot
out of 88 countries surveyed. Of which 12 States fall in the ‘alarming’
categories, Madhya Pradesh shows extreme levels of hunger. Punjab, Kerala,
Haryana and Assam fall in the serious category. With 87% of the population
living below the poverty line, the struggle to eke out a living is an onerous
task. Over 30m have joined the ranks
of hungry since mid-1990s, the study revealed.
Shockingly, in Maharashtra’s
Vidarbha region 9 farmers committed suicide in the last 24 hours. This takes
the toll of farmers’ suicides to 19 in the last one week and 194 this year.
Does anyone care? More than six decades post Independence and being counted as
one of the key growth engines to the world economy, why are hunger deaths still
happening in India? Obviously, because those in power are greedy for
money. Not even 15 paise out of a rupee
of development aid has percolated down to the people who needed it most. The
real beneficiaries are Government officials, who more often than not bribe
their way to stay in lucrative posts.
More. Over 230 million of the rural
poor are — the highest for any country in the world. Malnutrition accounts for
nearly 50% of child deaths in India as every third adult (aged 15-49 years) is
reported to be thin (BMI less than 18.5). According to the latest report on the
state of food insecurity in rural India, more than 1.5 million children are at
risk of becoming malnourished because of rising global food prices.
Besides, almost 80% of rural
households do not have access to toilets within their premises. The figure
exceeds 90% in states like Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Orissa and MP. The
proportion of stunted children (under-5) at 48% is again among the highest in
the world. Every second child in the country is stunted, according to the
health ministry's figures. Around 30% of babies in India are born underweight. In fact, the Index reveals that the
country’s rates of child malnutrition are higher than most countries in
Sub-Saharan Africa.
We have the poor being imprisoned
for thefts of food but those in power prosper and refuse to be
accountable. Our netas continue to parrot “everyone is equal before law”, yet till
date all have successfully thwarted the due process of law. Be it Lalu-Rabri,
Mulayam, Mayawati, Modi, Shibhu Soren et al. Either because cases were
investigated long after the crime and the delay was directly linked to the
period when they were enjoying power or the ruling Party needed their help to
keep the Government afloat.
It’s all very well for the Prime
Minister to lament, “Democracy will have little meaning for the common man if
he cannot secure basic rights and easy access to speedy justice”. But what are
our judges doing about the backlog of over 2.5 crore cases pending at various
levels across the country.
Sadly, the charades being played out
on the political chessboard prove conclusively that shadow
matters not substance.
High time that our netas stop getting
their shorts in knots over excessive trivia, get their act together, take responsibility, amend their ways and
address real serious issues of governance. The minimum they owe the aam aadmi who reposed faith in them.
Else history will never forgive them. ---- INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|
|
| | << Start < Previous 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 Next > End >>
| Results 4528 - 4536 of 5987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|