|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Acquisition:DON’T DEPRIVE FARMERS,Dhurjati Mukherjee, 8 May, 2011 |
|
|
Events & Issues
New Delhi
9 May 2011
Land Acquisition
DON’T DEPRIVE FARMERS
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
Land acquisition has become a volatile and contentious issue
with farmers opposing it, which they believe favours the rich and powerful. Indeed,
not only have the on-going protests in Greater Noida, Agra and Aligarh in UP
turned violent, killing both farmers and policemen but demonstrations have
taken place, from time to time, in various other parts of the country. Namely,
over the use of force in taking over land for setting up of industries and/or
for “pubic purposes”.
Importantly, the whole gamut of land acquisition clearly
reveals that poor farmers, tribals and others have been forced to not only give
up their land but also the money offered has been below market rates and insufficient to compensate their loss. Be it UP,
Orissa, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu or West Bengal
there have been serious problems in acquiring land for building roads, steel
plant, airport or nuclear power plant.
Recall, way back in the 1930’s Mahatma Gandhi in a reference
to the Tata’s had warned: “The disposed never got the exact equivalent of the
land taken. What is the value of all the
boons that the Tata scheme claims to confer upon India if it is to be at the expense
of even one poor man? I suggest to the custodians of the great name that they
would more truly advance India’s
interest if they will defer to the wishes of their weak and helpless
countrymen”.
It is in this context that the Land Acquisition Amendment Bill
gains credence and how far it would ensure proper rehabilitation of the dis-possessed.
Following violent protests against the UP Government’s liberal land policy for facilitating
the Yamuna Expressway, the Union Rural Development Ministry is now thinking of
adding ‘annuity’ to the pending Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R) Bill.
Whereby, the farmers would get fixed amount annuity periodically after their
land is acquired. This would be in addition to the compensation that they got
for their land.
Pertinently, annuity per se is expected to sweeten the
compensation in the R & R Bill and serve as a guideline on an “acceptance
package”, non-binding on States. However, with UP and Haryana giving “good
compensation with annuity” in their R & R policies, the Centre would be
forced to adopt this.
The proposal comes in the wake of a serious debate over the
suggestions made in the draft. The earlier Aligarh face-off between farmers saw the Opposition
argue that the Centre’s failure to make necessary amendments was responsible
for states like UP acquiring land with impunity for private players. One cannot
absolve the Government of its responsibility as nothing had been done over the
past few years with the clamour against land acquisition rising.
Recently, the Prime Minister assured a delegation led by
Rahul Gandhi that the Bill would be brought soon as it finalization was taken
time due to lack of agreement on many contentious issues. Said he, “We cannot
allow the transfer of land from the poor to the rich without giving the
benefits to the poor”.
Significantly, the State’s role in acquisition could be
further reduced from 30 per cent as given in the Land Acquisition Amendment Bill
to 10 per cent to win over the Trinamool Congress Chief, Mamata Banerjee.
Meanwhile, the Trinamool Congress has submitted a proposal wherein it has called
for scrapping the old Act altogether. It is totally opposed to State Governments
acquiring land on behalf of private companies. Notably, it has underscored that
the Government does not act for private players and there should be clear
definition of “public purpose” in the acquisition law.
The Party has also pointed out that before any project
starts, the social and environment impact studies should be completed and the acquisition
process must not begin without the concerned villagers’ consent. Given that the
old Act has no provision for obtaining the landowners’ consent for acquiring
land “for any public purpose”.
Moreover, Section 5A of the Act only allows landowners to
file objections, if any, within 30 days from the date of publication of notice
under Section 4. The objections would be heard but “the decision of the Government
shall be final”. In fact, Mamata had stood her ground in Singur and Nandigram
against acquisition for the Tata small car project. Her plea: Land could be
acquired only for any “public purpose”. She
has also demanded the compensation and rehabilitation package be settled before
the acquisition process starts.
Another aspect of the problem which needs examination is
whether agricultural land, which yields two crops per year, should be acquired.
The case for such a takeover should be outlined and not done just to satisfy
private players for setting up industries. Thus, it is necessary to draw up a
national plan with regard to conversion of agricultural land for industrial
purposes, keeping in mind the rehabilitation aspect and also the future source
of livelihood of the displaced and their families.
Undoubtedly, if proper steps are not taken, the resultant
effect in the not-too-distant future would be large-scale displacement and migration
to urban centres in search of employment and livelihood which, in turn, would
increase social chaos and tension in society.
In the circumstances, it is imperative that the amendment to
the Land Acquisition Act be worked out in such a manner that the poor and
tribals remain unaffected. Against the backdrop of various surveys which found
that most of those whose land had been acquired landed in utter distress and
not a few perished in hunger and poverty.
Hence, it is vital that livelihood security should be the
prime consideration in evolving a viable rehabilitation package for farmers so
that the loss of land is compensated in such a way that the disposed are nor
affected and can find a new lease of life.
Clearly, land is a very vital asset, specially in a country
like India
where population growth along-with population density is very high. Its
judicious use is necessary keeping in mind the interests of BPL families and
the economically weaker sections, which constitute over 45 per cent of the
population. Consequently, the issue of land acquisition and rehabilitation
needs to be examined by a panel of eminent experts comprising economists,
planners, legal experts, sociologists’ et al before arriving at a judicious
decision. ------ INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
RBI Un-independent Thinking:RATE HIKE CURBS GROWTH, by Shivaji Sarkar, 5 May, 2011 |
|
|
Economic Highlights
New Delhi, 5 May 2011
RBI Un-independent
Thinking
RATE HIKE CURBS
GROWTH
By Shivaji Sarkar
The new monetary policy of Reserve Bank (RBI) has confirmed
that slow-down is imminent, but the prescription --- raising interest rates ---
is to put a further brake on the growth process.
Another pernicious decision, under Government pressure, has
been its suggestion to link fuel prices to international crude prices. The
trend was indicated by the Asian Development Bank (ADB), which had said that
the GDP growth in India
would come down to less than 8 per cent. The international rating agency
Goldman Sachs had predicted it would be around 7.6 per cent. Now RBI puts it at
8 per cent against the Government’s assessment of 8.6 per cent.
Significantly, the RBI has raised the repo rate and reverse
repo rates for the ninth time in 15 months. Each such upward hike has led to an
increase in interest rates. This is supposed to be the panacea for putting a
check on money supply that leads to inflation. It has not worked. There are now
multiple channels for money supply, including foreign sources.
Food prices that were rising initially have led to general
headline inflation, affecting almost every sector. Thus, the obvious reflection
on the index for industrial production (IIP) was inevitable. Manufacturing
growth is at a mere one per cent in 2010-11 (19.6 per cent in 2009), capital
goods at minus 13.7 per cent (42.9p.c in 09) and consumer non-durables at minus
1.1 per cent (3p.c. in 09). There is only a minor growth in electricity
generation to 6 per cent from 5.4 per cent in 2009.
The monetary policy coming a week after the ADB warning was
expected to take note of it and moderate the bank rates. It has not happened.
The hackneyed way of raising rates is not the solution. The RBI is not unaware
of it.
It has not worked for any sector except housing, where it
has been able to put a check on speculative activities. It may be recalled that
RBI had effected the first rate rise to curb the unethical and un-businesslike
practices of the housing sector. The rate rise had a singular effect. Housing
prices started reaching its plateau and many unscrupulous companies moved out
or closed down.
It is difficult to say whether the housing sector has learnt
any lesson. So the policy for this sector needs to be continued. But for
penalising one sector, all others need not be treated with the same medicine.
The RBI knows it. In its policy statement, it says, “The
pace of industrial activity has been slowing mainly due to the impact of past
monetary policy actions and high input prices. External demand too may slow if
global recovery slackens”.
This is the concern. Despite knowing about its impact, why
is the RBI repeating the prescription? Any physician decides on a course of
action taking care of the therapeutic needs of the patient. The RBI is not
doing it.
If its concern is the housing sector, it is capable of
charting out separate rates for it. But to seek one solution, it is not prudent
to throw the baby with the bathtub. A higher reverse repo, at which the RBI
gives incentive to banks to park money with it, is supposed to reduce liquidity
and demand to cool prices. Banks have done it.
This apart, banks have had a high non-performing asset
(NPA), euphemism for bad debt. The RBI has now stipulated that the banks would
have to keep a reserve of 40 per cent instead of 35 to balance the NPA so that
they do not go bust. The cash reserve ratio though is maintained at 6 per cent
almost 25 to 27 per cent of the banks’ money is parked with RBI.
It means that not enough money is available for credit. The
banks are yet to come out of the syndrome of lending Rs 68,000 crores to the
bidders of the 3G telecom spectrum. It is not a happy situation for the
industry, which is being starved of sources for raising its funds.
The rising rates are adding to the cost of the industry,
which transfers it to the consumers. The common man spends over 60 per cent of
his income on food items. As these get more expensive he cuts down his
purchases of all other goods, even textiles and garments. As his purchasing
power reduces, industrial and manufactured goods glut in the godowns add to the
slowdown.
The mood has been best summed up the Confederation of Indian
Industry (CII) President B Muthuraman. He says, “Industry is already reeling
under the impact of rising raw material costs and an increase in interest rates
will be an added burden”.
It is also likely to have an impact on jobs generation. “We
are afraid that with growth slowing down, employment targets will not be
achieved”, adds Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI)
Director General Rajiv Kumar.
Besides, the industry with rising inflation also faces
pressure on wages, high cost of credit and input prices. The RBI has ignored
this in formulating its policy. Its suggestion for raising the petroleum prices
“to check the Government’s fiscal deficit” is also misplaced.
The Government does not give a dime as subsidy either to the
consumer or the petroleum companies. Each petro price hike enriches it with
higher accrual of excise and other taxes. Even now over 50 per cent of the
retail petro prices comprise of Central and State taxes. The suggestion of
further hike would have a cascading effect as with transport price increases,
all other commodities are bound to get expensive.
It seems the RBI has stopped its process of independent
thinking to monitor the Indian economy. Apparently, the Government is dictating
terms to tailor its policies. Interfering in independent, if not fully
autonomous, institutions create severe problems of credibility.
The Governments needs to remember that these are
internationally respected institutions. Subverting their autonomy might lead
the nation to an abyss. The Government’s interest in such subversion possibly
stems from its need to take higher borrowings at less cost to meet its fiscal
deficit.
Needless to say, this is not healthy. Unless and until
institutions like the RBI are restored their basic freedom, the problems
afflicting the country would not be tackled in an effective way. ----- INFA
(Copyright India News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
Rising Unemployment:GOVT INTERVENTION VITAL, BY Dhurjati Mukherjee,4 May 2011 |
|
|
Open Forum
New Delhi, 4 May 2011
Rising Unemployment
GOVT INTERVENTION
VITAL
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
Prompted by country-wide concerns of growing unemployment
and under-employment, the Government set up an expert committee to ascertain
the accuracy of the Union Labour Ministry’s annual employment survey and
suggest remedial measures.
Shockingly, the survey for April-March 2009-10 released in
October last, revealed a much higher unemployment rate of 9.4 per cent spread
over a 400 million work-force. This year plans are afoot to widen the survey
base and cover all the 629 districts against only 300 last year and interview
over one lakh respondents.
Rising unemployment is all the more alarming against the
backdrop that the growth rates are quite high. True, certain categories of
employers are optimistic about their hiring plans and the organized sector is
set to create around 1.6 million new jobs this year, the figures are far from
adequate keeping in view the employment needs of the new entrants into the job
market.
The advent of new technology and techniques of increasing
productivity (both in the field and factory) have led to increased
unemployment. Notwithstanding, that heath care (2.50 lakh jobs), hospitality,
real estate, media and entertainment and IT are promising sectors of employment
generation.
This has resulted in muted demands being voiced to accord
Constitutional guarantee to the Right to Work. Presently, only socialist
countries accord the Right of Employment to their citizens but there are no
unemployment benefits as an alternative.
A document prepared by the Labour, in the 1980’s pointed
out: “The overall approach to the concept of Right to Work has essentially to
be that of creating conditions for the people to find productive work in the
process of development …. . However, the inclusion of Right to Work as a
Fundamental Right in the Constitution would make it incumbent to provide
employment to the residuary categories of persons who will still be unemployed
during the transition period”.
Economists and planners feel that the primary reliance must
be on the economic system to generate employment. As such, employment
generation has to be consciously built into the development strategy of any
country. In India,
for example, of the over 400 million working force, around 220-230 million
continue to depend on agriculture for their living. Thus, the 9 per cent growth
of the economy has of no significance to the farm workers.
Leading to surmise that India’s employment strategy needs to
be based on revitalizing all segments of the rural sector which have been
neglected over many years. Though, the
emphasis on infrastructure development vis-à-vis building roads, bridges etc
and extending power and telecom facilities impacted in generating employment,
including self-employment, in the last few years but this is inadequate.
Consequently, it is now necessary that the improved
infrastructure should be utilized to motivate people to set up tiny and cottage
industries along-with agro-based industries which have great potential through
skill training and financial assistance.
Besides, the country needs to explore the employment
potential in the food processing and horticulture industry which is witnessing
a revolution. Undoubtedly, if this development of agro-based industries is
given special attention, it could change the face of Indian villages and
generate employment opportunities. Towards that end, an integrated food law
could be brought to replace the current multiple laws and regulations, which
have affected normal growth and standards of the food processing industry.
In addition, horticulture, floriculture and food processing
could add value to products and ensure better returns for the farming
community. These unexplored areas with active support from research institutes
could also help in generating adequate employment opportunities and assist the
revival process of the rural economy. Moreover, through a proper plan, the
country could also gain valuable foreign exchange through exports.
Apart from these, there needs to be proper development of
cottage and village industries. The Government has to come forward and
encourage artisans to ensure that they get market value for their products. By
identifying around 200 growth centers throughout the country and providing
proper infrastructural facilities, roads, power and telecommunication, would
ensure accessibility to markets and help sell produce at competitive rates.
This could be completed in a time-bound frame of 5 to 10 years, by the Twelfth
Plan.
The National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized
Sector (NCEUS) aptly suggested the need to promote small, micro and tiny
enterprises with credit, marketing and technology support. Clusters of tiny
industries deserve SEZ treatment more than the rich exporting units. Priorities
in credit facilities should go to small farmers and micro enterprises.
Importantly, the entire planning process must now centre on
helping the poor and the vulnerable sections. The Government’s decision to provide
100 days guaranteed employment in a year under the NREGS to one member of every
poor household at a minimum wage for public works projects should be seriously
implemented. As it has helped in serving the dual purpose of generating
employment and in building rural infrastructure.
However, the performance review committee of the NREGS found
that the national average for April-October 2010 was poor and stood at 34 days.
Only Andhra Pradesh had done well by generating 46 days of work per household.
It was followed by Tripura (40) and Orissa and Rajasthan (39) each.
Clearly, our leaders need to heed the concerned voices of
economists and planners including former President Abdul Kalam who have
repeatedly asserted the need to reverse the planning strategy and concentrate
on the rural sector. As this would go a long way in tackling the problem of
unemployment and under-employment as also boost the living standards of the
poor and the economically weaker sections. Thereby, usher in the much-talked
about inclusive growth. ----- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
India: A Soft State:NOTHING BUT CHEAP TALK, by Poonam I Kaushish, 7 May, 2011 |
|
|
Political Diary
New Delhi, 7 May 2011
India: A Soft
State
NOTHING BUT CHEAP
TALK
By Poonam I Kaushish
“Geronimo EKIA…. We got him.” Thus, ended the life of the
world’s most wanted terrorist, Osama bin Laden. Devastatingly and brutally
brought home Monday last when after 10 long years of 9/11, the US tasted
victory. Not only did Operation Osama, the culmination of the War on Terror
showcase to the world what US
patriotism and nationalism is all about, earning it the numero uno Super Power tag. More important, it is a country which neither
forgives nor forgets. Bluntly, don’t-mess-with-me-I’ll-get-you. Eureka!
On the flip side, from the Kargil fiasco, Kandhar humiliation
and Parliament brazen assault to 26/11 Mumbai blood-bath, India’s security
farce continues. While Masood Azhar roams free in Pakistan, ‘death awardee’
Afzal Guru is alive and kicking in jail, Ajmal Kasab is still to be
convicted, Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi and Hafeez Muhammad Saeed continue to spew
venom against India and Pakistan scoffs at New Delhi’s hard rhetoric about
crushing terrorism which ends in a whimper.
Regrettably, our leaders continue to wallow in the false
belief that wars are born in the minds of men ---- won by waving the white flag!
Think, post Washington’s Operation Geronimo, as the clamour for an US-type
operation to revenge Pakistan’s diabolic terrorists’ acts grows, led by Army
Chief VP Singh (India can stage an Abbottabad-type operation), our leaders refuse
to re-draft its Pak policy.
Instead, South Block willy-nilly asserts dialogue with Islamabad is the best option
given the volatile situation in the country. Said Prime Minister Manmohan Singh,
“The Osama episode will not deter will not change the universe of the discourse
between India and Pakistan. Talks
with Pakistan
will continue...” Sic. Adding lamely, even the US
has not broken its ties with Pakistan.
Arguably, is this 'don’t-rock-the-boat-avoid-confrontation'
policy responsible for New Delhi’s
failure to check terrorism, from across the border, North-East and Naxal
country? Do we lack the will for bold, decisive action to defend the country’s
security interests? Is India a soft
state? Yes, a big yes.
Undoubtedly, the polity’s powerlessness to deal with hard
targets strongly has given us the soft State image whereby everyone takes us
for a ride. Worse, the Administration is unable to enforce its writ throughout
the country, a natural sine qua non
of a State. Remember, it is no use having the instruments to enforce law if one
lacks the ability to put them to effective use.
Undoubtedly, New Delhi’s hunger
to build bridges with Islamabad
appears to have blinded the Government to the web of deceit spun by its
duplicitous neighbour. Astonishingly, the Prime Minister turned his cheek to
Pakistan's Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir's blasphemous remarks describing as “outdated”
India's demand for action against the Mumbai perpetrators and warning of
“severe consequences and terrible catastrophe” if it undertook an
Abbottabad-type “misadventure.”
Conveniently forgetting the harsh truth. Talks and terror
cannot co-exist. Pakistan
is a sponsor and user of terror and not its victim. It has not been honest in
its commitment that its territory will not be used for terror. Asserted a senior
South Block official, “Remember, Islamabad
is no pushover, it needs to answer some tough questions. Are they doing enough
on LeT, JeM and Hizbul Mujahideen? The Mumbai trials? On Lakhvi, Saeed et al all
who remain a serious threat to India”?
In fact, many question the utility of an Indo-Pak dialogue
when Islamabad has not delivered on India's demands
on 26/11. “Where was the need for India
to say that it will continue with the dialogue process irrespective of the fact
that Osama bin Laden was protected by Pakistan? India had not
called off the dialogue. It reflects poorly on India's foreign policy. It is
devoid of any strategy, leave alone objective. All these show that our policy
is whimsical and not goal-oriented," said a strategy affairs expert
Indeed, India's
approach has been incoherent over the past two years, in fact bankrupt since
26/11. While a section of the Government favoured talks after Sharm-el-Sheikh,
the Union Home Ministry talked tough on terror. Finally, the Prime Minister,
for reasons best known to him, put the talks back on track by inviting his
counter-part Yousaf Raza Gilani to Mohali as part of cricket diplomacy.
But till date all this has yielded zilch results. Clearly, if New Delhi means business it needs to quickly
do justice in the 26/11 case by sentencing Ajmal Kasab through a speedy trail.
There is no point in asking Pakistan to hand over Hafiz Saeed or Dawood Ibrahim
and speculating on the possibility of a special operation to access them when a
terrorist caught during a terror act of
terror is being used as a poster boy for Indian democracy and justice system.
The time has come for New
Delhi to get its priorities straight and act together.
Our leaders need to show some backbone in punishing terrorists before claiming
to deal with the phenomenon of terrorism. They need to distinguish between
conflict resolution and peace. Make clear that terrorism facing the country is
not co-terminus with the Kashmir problem. Kashmir’s resolution and countering Pak-sponsored
terrorism are two different issues.
Solution of J&K will not automatically defuse the terrorist threat
for India.
Also, work towards evolving a policy that combines open
dialogue with diplomatic pressure. Simply inter-acting, is not a solution.
Talks to improve trade and cultural ties are not instruments to address
terrorism from Pakistan.
Plainly, statements like “Pakistan
should stop harbouring terrorists” are innocuous demands having only rhetorical
value. India
should delineate a time frame with specific demands and spell out viable
consequences if these are not met. Misadventures like Operation Parakaram
(troop mobilization along LoC in 2002) following the attack on Parliament
should be avoided.
Pertinently, perhaps former US
President Nixon had India
on his mind, in his book "The Real War." Said he: “Nations live or
die by the way they respond to the particular challenges they face While might
certainly does not make right, neither does right by itself make might. The
time when a nation most craves ease may be the moment when it can least afford
to let down its guard.
“The moment when it most wishes it could address its
domestic needs may be the moment when it most urgently has to confront an
external threat. The nation that survives is the one that rises to meet that
moment: that has the wisdom to recognize the threat and the will to turn it
back, and that does so before it is too late.”
Clearly, La affair Osama
should awaken New Delhi India into crafting a long-term Pakistan policy
taking national security imperatives into consideration. We need to formulate a
clear-cut regional diplomatic thrust. As also get rid of the naïve notion that
we can preserve peace by exuding goodwill. This is not only stupid but could be
dangerous. It may win New Delhi
accolades but it also tempts the aggressor to be more belligerent.
True, one may not be overtly aggressive but we need to think
and act smart. Have a clear view of where the dangers lie and the responses
necessary to quell the danger. Tough times call for tough action. Above all, our
polity needs to hold the mirror and be truthful. That ‘bankrupt’ practitioners
of third-rate politics do not have the critical first-rate political will and
stomach for making India
into an effective hard State. After all, war can only be won by war! ----- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
Osama Bin Laden’s Death: WAR ON TERROR: WHAT NEXT?, by Monish Tourangbam, 3 May, 2011 |
|
|
Round The World
New Delhi, 3 May 2011
Osama Bin Laden’s Death
WAR ON TERROR: WHAT
NEXT?
By Monish Tourangbam
Research Scholar, School of International Studies (JNU)
The US has finally hunted down their
enemy No.1, Saudi tycoon-cum-dreaded terrorist leader Osama Bin Laden aka the
most wanted man in the world responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Probably the
longest man-hunt in human history ended with an American operation at the
garrison town of Abbottabad, about 50 kms
North-East of Pakistan’s
Capital Islamabad.
Needless to say, Osama was the
primary reason behind the War on Terror in Afghanistan that will now out-live
his death. In fact, the War on Terror and the Af-Pak strategy is much more
complex at present and it is no longer about one Osama.
Consequently, despite the debate that
certainly arises as to how Osama’s death would affect America’s withdrawal strategy from Af-Pak, US
operations in the region at this juncture can hardly be decided on the basis of
his death. Indeed, there might be increasing pressure on allied countries to
re-assess the war in Afghanistan
as all nations involved have experienced war-fatigue and are looking for a safe
way out.
But, it is also true that the war in
the Af-Pak region has morphed into a bloodier, messy and enduring campaign and
the Taliban insurgency and the many splinter groups that Islamic fundamentalism
has spawned will hardly be affected with the death of one Osama Bin Laden.
Significantly, the coming days and
weeks will be a critical time to see how the Obama Administration, triumphant
and energized because of this successful campaign capitalizes on the gains. For
one, the Al Qaeda will definitely be
in an unsettled mood suffering a leadership void because not many terrorist
leaders could be as charismatic as Osama, who had a reputation of unifying
ability and carried with him the aura of an iconic leader, a millionaire and a
former Mujahedeen who stood with his
brethren for the cause of Islam.
Even while he was on the run from
the US
forces, and maintained an under-ground life, the very knowledge that he was out
there somewhere still plotting against the western countries would have been a
big morale booster for other like-minded groups and “jihadis”. Indeed, his death will be a big blow to the hearts and
minds of Al Qaeda members and their
affiliate groups. His second in command, Ayman Zawahiri, for all his
capabilities, does not seem to have the same kind of charisma and uniting
power.
Thus, definitely some points could
be scored at this moment of crisis within the central Al Qaeda. But, again the Al
Qaeda itself has become highly de-centralized over the years leading to a
lot of splinter groups in different parts of the world, sharing the same kind
of ideology and often employing the same kind of terror tactics but without
much of a central control.
Moreover, one-man terror plots are
equally possible these days, with the kind of reach and connectivity that
terrorist operations have shown, using information technology and other
inventions of the modern world for their sinister purposes.
As such, the coming days are not
going be easy. Hence, the end of Osama is a watershed moment, a tremendous
psychological blow to terror organizations, a show of resolve that the effort
to catch or kill the mass murderer had not slackened over the years.
But, this is definitely not the end
of Al Qaeda, nor any real comfort to
the kind of campaign that US forces and other countries would face in their
fight against terrorism, especially in the epicenter of international terrorism:
the Af-Pak region.
The Taliban insurgency and the various
splinter groups will hardly be affected by Osama’s death. The corruption in the
Afghan Government and society, the internal ethnic divisions and the drug money
that fuels a large part of the insurgency has hardly anything to do with the
end of Osama. Dreaded groups like the Haqqanis
or groups in Pakistan like
the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan and the Laskar-e-Taiba will hardly tone down their violence
because Osama is gone.
According to Seth Jones of
RAND Corporation, a major US
think-tank, Bin Laden's death does not resolve the big-ticket issues between Washington and Islamabad,
namely Pakistan's support
for the Taliban and other insurgent
groups battling U.S. forces
in Afghanistan,
like the Haqqani network.
“As long as many of
those issues continue to exist, and they have very different interests, and
very different strategic goals in the area, then some level of conflict will
likely persist,” Jones added.
In fact, it is being feared that
terrorist attacks could actually rise in the coming days and weeks as a sort of
reprisal and revenge against Osama Bin Laden’s killing. There could be
deliberate effort to show that the Al
Qaeda was still very much in action. This could be done through quick-time
small-scale terrorist attacks.
The US Department of Homeland
Security reportedly said, “The Intelligence Community
(IC) assesses the death of Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden could result in
retaliatory attacks in the Homeland and against US and Western interests
overseas.”
The death of Osama
and the circumstances in which he was found has raised a major debate around
the role of Pakistan
in the War on Terror. The fact that Osama was traced to a mansion at Abbottabad,
very close to the Pakistani Capital, and right under the nose of the Pakistani Military Academy
has raised a lot of questions on the Pakistani military intelligence and the Government.
Undoubtedly, for
quite some time, the top brass of the Pakistani leadership have been denying
that Osama was in Pakistan.
The present situation puts them in tight rope exposing either the connivance of
the Pakistani Establishment or the incompetence of their intelligence.
According to Hasan
Askari Rizvi, a military analyst in Lahore, “If Bin Laden’s presence was not known to Pakistan’s
security agencies when he was located close to important military installation,
it will be viewed as their incompetence or over-confidence. If they knew about
his presence but did not take action, this will raise questions about the
agenda of Pakistan’s
security agencies for fighting terrorism,” he added.
Importantly,
Indian officials also have taken serious note of the scenario, and re-emphasize
their long held view that Pakistan
continued to provide safe havens to terrorists, thus under-mining the fight
against terrorism. “The world must not let down its united effort to overcome
terrorism and eliminate the safe havens and sanctuaries that have been provided
to terrorists in our own neighbourhood,’’ observed India’s External Affairs Minister
S.M. Krishna.
Undoubtedly,
Pakistan is an important
ally in the US War on Terror in the Af-Pak region but it cannot be denied that Islamabad has not been
committed to the purpose and has played a double-game. In the process,
sincerely acting against only those terror groups that threaten the Pakistani State,
and over-looking and even colluding in the case of groups that target India.
Hence,
in the coming days, the location of the operation to kill Osama, Abbottabad
might assume more importance opening rounds and rounds of debate regarding the
nature of Pakistan’s
assistance in the War on Terror and testing various nuances of the US-Pakistan
alliance against terrorism. ----- INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
|
More...
-
ADB Warning:REVERSE FARM POLICIES, by Shivaji Sarkar, 29 Apr, 2011
-
Adarsh Scam:MAKING ARMY SCAPE GOATS, by PK Vasudeva, 3 May, 2011
-
Vocational Training:KEY TO NATION’S ECONOMY , by Suraj Saraf, 27 Apr, 2011
-
Mocking Parliament Again:PARTISAN POLITICS PLAYS HAVOC, by Poonam I Kaushish, 30 Apr, 11
| << Start < Previous 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 Next > End >>
| Results 4447 - 4455 of 6261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|