Home
 
Home
News and Features
INFA Digest
Parliament Spotlight
Dossiers
Publications
Journalism Awards
Archives
RSS
 
 
 
 
 
 
An Intolerable Toll?: WHOSE LIFE IS IT, ANYWAY?, By Poonam I Kaushish, 18 February 2025 Print E-mail

Political Diary

New Delhi, 18 February 2025

An Intolerable Toll?

WHOSE LIFE IS IT, ANYWAY?

By Poonam I Kaushish 

Stuck records are tiresome. But when tragedy struck Capital’s New Delhi’s railway station Saturday night killing 18 people and injuring hundreds sounding like a stuck record is imperative unless the message is driven home.

Yesterday, UP’s Prayagraj  station too crumbled under deluge of unstoppable devotees within a month of the one at Maha Kumbh wherein over 30 lost their lives and 60 injured in a stampede during Amavasya Shahi Snan embracing all in a devastating hug flattening men, women and children, whatever came their way in a mad dash to take a snan at Triveni Sangam (confluence of Ganga, Yamuna, Saraswati) leaving a trail of death and destruction, anger and anguish, despair and desperation, morbidity and mortality in this catastrophic season.

Public memory is short, shorter is the official one. Arguably, why did Railways keep selling 2500 unreserved tickets than train capacity without checking flow of pilgrims towards the station? Two, why were 48% fewer security staff deployed? Three, why was there a mix-up of platforms of two special Kumbh trains? Who will account for administrative lapses and failures? Else people wouldn’t have died. It was a disaster which has been allowed to be played out. First, came the denial, then an attempt to downplay the loss of lives. 

Clearly, crowd management is a well-researched science but no lessons have been learnt from the September 2017 Mumbai’s Elphinstone Road station crowd ‘collapse’ which resulted in 23 deaths after a woman slipped or 2010 stampede which caused 20 deaths. January 2005 stampede during the Kalubai Yatra Mandhardevi at Maharashtra’s Satara killing 293 people. 

Ditto at earlier Kumbhs. In 2013 overcrowding left 37 dead. Between 1990-2022 over 14,700 people died due to overcrowding causing stampedes. Many which started when someone slipped. An International Journal of Stampede Reduction study pointed out that religious gatherings and pilgrimages account for nearly 80% stampedes in India, besides rock concerts and fairs. 

Alas, as people grapple with this calamity our netas cursorily go through their ritual political circus. All lament the deaths, parrot grief and vouch to help people. The Railway Ministry and State Government assert everything under control by setting up committees of enquiry. Babudom analyses the cause of overcrowding and its aftermath over official lunches. Their ideas and remedies as jammed and stuffed as the overcrowding under discussion.  Everyone is satisfied that they have done their bit. Everything is kaam chalao! 

Questionably, does anyone really care? Given that overcrowding is a given at religious sites, train and bus stations wherein hundreds die, families lose their loved ones. No. Why does the Government only react after people have lost their lives? Who is responsible? Who will be held accountable? And which head will roll? None. Moreover, why do politicians feel that merely sanctioning monies will solve the problem? 

 

Undeniably, every time a tragedy strikes it’s a tell-tale of total apathy of insensitive Administrations both at the Centre and State Governments. Of rulers who ignore experts who in turn, blame it on lessons not learnt by successive Administrations. Primarily because the aam aadmi translates into sterile statistics to be manipulated at will. Standing mute testimony to a callous and selfish polity and Administration bereft of cure and consolation. All cursing the Government! 

Evidently, the administrative system had practically collapsed long ago --- not only in New Delhi but almost everywhere. A life-style of Nano Yuppiesim only brings forth the macro consequences of neglect of socio-political environment. A total urban breakdown, neglect of rural poverty, unpaved roads, unsanitary environments and a collapsing sewage and drainage system. At a stage, where another crisis threatens.

“The truth is that even as we have achieved political and economic freedom lopsided economic growth has created a dispossessed population,” asserted a social scientist. Unfortunately, most Indians do not care. Absence of national character and indiscipline has led to a creeping paralysis of ‘sab chalta hai’. Think. Who will bear the cross? How does one salvage India’s soul?

It’s all very well to talk of ‘demographic dividend’ but this notion falls by the wayside if the individual is given the short shrift and the collective is made the be-all and end-all. Having VIPs from President, Vice President, Prime Minister, Chief Ministers with Cabinets, Mantris etc taking a dip in the Ganga as the showpiece of Kumbh is all fine. But when the ‘unwashed masses’ are left to fend for themselves, our leaders and babus must ask themselves if their fake construct of “Sabka Saath” hides an undesirable reality.  

Having people risk being crushed for an occasion is hardly good advertisement for ring-fenced, safe versions of similar gatherings. These tragedies have shown how severely deficient we are in preparing for mega events. It is yet another wake-up call which should become an inflexion point where our jan sevaks turn their attention to value individual life. If that means prohibiting gatherings beyond a size until infrastructure and control mechanisms are ready, so be it. 

Our polity needs to take into account local realities and involve experts who would evaluate the problems, study its context and be involved in decision and policy-making. With special emphasis on problems created by burgeoning population and its impact on the local eco-system, growth of hap-hazard planning, environmental  insanitation and decay, drainage and  stagnant water bodies. 

Our administrators need to look beyond policemen with lathis shepherding crowds, personnel deployment, involve better organization coordination, scientific planning and data-driven decision making especially by factoring in crowd estimation and identifying points and site arrangements.

The National Disaster Management Authority has framed detailed guidelines for crowd management. Yet authorities at large congregations don’t always act promptly to ensure crowds keep moving calmly. One fails to understand why State-of-art crowd control methods or drones were not used to help law enforcers to monitor crowd density and swiftly identify source of pressure or disturbance.   

The need of the hour demands action. Blue-prints and discussions are not going to help unless and until the Government starts implementing them. Even as NaMo bulldozes ahead with grand designs to develop India in to Viksit Bharat, this season’s devastating stampedes shows fixing today’s over-crowded metropolises is a more pressing task. 

The writing is on the wall. Our polity needs to pull up their bootstraps and focus on long-term not short-term planning. One needs neither a bleeding heart nor blindness to know what should be done. For if we still elect to do nothing about crowd management stampedes only holds out promises of more misery, more wrenching news and more cries. Life, after all, is not collating numbers, but flesh and blood with beating hearts. Can we just let them bleed?

Remember Aldous Huxley words: Men do not learn from lessons of history which is the most important of all the lessons of history. Else history will repeat as farce! ----- INFA

 (Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)

 

President Rule In Manipur: ROAD TO DIALOGUE, PEACE? By Insaf, 15 February 2025 Print E-mail

Round The States

New Delhi, 15 February 2025 

President Rule In Manipur

ROAD TO DIALOGUE, PEACE?

By Insaf 

The Centre is desperately trying to turn the corner in Manipur. Much belated. N Biren Singh finally resigned as Chief Minister on Sunday last, following his visit to New Delhi and 21 months after the ongoing Meitei-Kuki ethnic conflict takes its toll with little signs of normalcy returning in the immediate future. Not with an end to violence but when members of both communities can return home and live without fear.  While Governor Ajay Bhalla had asked him to continue till ‘alternative’ arrangements were made, New Delhi was at a loss. Thursday last it announced President’s rule and the State assembly having been placed under ‘suspended animation’. This, only hours after Parliament was adjourned to meet again on March 10 for remaining Budget session and after a security plan was put in place with state police and intelligence agencies on high alert to monitor the situation.It’s an end to one chapter and opening of another till elections take place two years later. The BJP-led government sadly had failed miserably and the demand for Singh’s removal by Kuki-Zo-Hmar groups and even some of its MLAs could no longer be put on hold. The big question is will President’s rule be able to crackdown on armed groups in both the hills and the valley and usher in peace? The destruction has been massive and a big challenge ahead. The top agenda now is to build a conducive atmosphere for a political dialogue between the warring groups.To usher in peace! 

*                                   *                                               *                                              

Murmurs In Punjab AAP

AAP’s defeat in Delhi is having repercussions in Punjab. It’s Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann said on Thursday last that he is willing to step down if any party leader wants to take charge!This at a Cabinet meeting hours after its Amritsar North MLA Kunwar Vijay Partap Singhvoiced a replacement. Said he in a Facebook post: ‘It is time for introspection. I was deeply saddened by AAP’s defeat in Delhi, especially the personal defeat of senior leaders, which is extremely painful. Particularly when Congress leaders are rubbing salt into the wounds. This is a clear reflection of poor governance in Punjab.”A few days earlier, another MLA, Arora hadgiven a statement that the CM should be picked on merit, and it doesn’t matter if the person is a Sikh or a Hindu. Triggering speculation that AAP convenor Kejriwal may become the Chief Minister. He instead has urged Mann’s team to eye only winning 2027 elections in the state with utmost importance. Guess, that would not suffice. BJP is buoyed with its spectacular Delhi victory and would already be planning to oust AAP here too. Mann must put his house in order and ensure that government institutions deliver. Cracks must be cemented at the earliest.

*                                   *                                                

WB Budget & Rural Voter

Ruling TMC in West Bengal is doing a balancing act. Eyeing Assembly elections 2026, its Budget presented on Wednesday last,has set the tone to juggle around with available funds towoo the core voters. Said Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, ‘despite financial constraints and non-receipt of central funds, not a single paisa released in PMAY’, her government shall not backout from commitment to ensuring jobs and housing for rural folks. So, some spending on social welfare from its flagship LakshmirBhandar scheme (financial aid to women from EWS) and Kanyashree (aid to girls from low incomes families) has been diverted to building rural homes, under ‘Banglar Bari’ housing scheme, announced last December.This despite the state being under severe debt-- revenue deficit estimated at Rs 35,314 crore, fiscal deficit at Rs 73,177 crore and outstanding debt at Rs 7,71,670 crore! While populist schemes have paid off well for TMC, Didi needs to focus on rural sector now.Funds for projects shall be diverted to construct 16 lakh new houses in the upcoming financial year. Given the poor financial condition of the state, arranging money will be a challenge, says Opposition BJP. Perhaps not for Didi.

*                                   *                                                

Kerala Pvt Univs

The Left Democratic Front-led government in Kerala has done a big U-turn! On Monday last, it ratified a draft Bill on establishing private universities in the state and rolling out the red carpet. CPM leader and state Higher Education Minister, Professor R Bindu justifies: “Ours is a globalised society and we have to absorb changes if we want to survive in the highly competitive scenario. The Bill has envisaged social control and regulation of private universities. It was an inevitable decision in tune with the times. We can’t keep away from the changes.” However, as of now despite the mood to change, the government sticks to being ‘against entry of foreign universities.’The Bill is likely to be introduced in ongoing Assembly session.Remember, in 1995, CPM, then in oppositionhad triggered massive protests when Congress-led UDF government began a medical college in co-operative sector in Kannur. Five workers of its youth wing DYF were killed in police firing and since been marked as a historic agitation against privatisation of education in God’s own country. Every time the Congress sought to self-finance engineering and medical colleges to stem flow of students to other parts of country, the CPM said a big No, as the decision would “accelerate commercialisation of higher education”.But since taking over reins, attitude has changed. What more, time will tell.

*                                   *                                                

Assam’s Wife Bashing!

Politics reaches a new low in Assam. Chief Minister Himanta Sarmais targeting Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi by training guns at his wife, Elizabeth, originally from UK and an expert on climate change. On Wednesday, on X he said: “IFS officers require permission from Union government to marry foreigners and commit to their spouses acquiring Indian citizenship.However, allowing a foreign spouse of a lawmaker to retain foreign citizenship for 12 years is far too long. Loyalty to nation must always take precedence over all considerations.” This, after social media was agog with her having worked in Pakistan and at CDKN, Asia, 2011-2015.“Serious questions need to be answered regarding allegations of ISI links, leading young individuals to Pakistan Embassy for brainwashing and radicalisation, and refusal to take Indian citizenship for past 12 years…”added Sarma. Gogoi trashed these: “Normally these emerge close to elections. Last time when I was contesting for Jorhat seat, these came up a month before. ‘Why did he marry a woman from another country? Couldn’t he find a woman in Assam?’ But this time, there’s one year left, and BJP has already started…” The saffron brigade plans way ahead, even if it’s nasty and mean. Not done is alien to politics.---INFA

 (Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)

Tariff, Gas Haze Trump Talks: WILL STEALTH F-35 FLY TO INDIA?, By Shivaji Sarkar, 17 February 2025 Print E-mail

Economic Highlights

New Delhi, 17 February 2025

Tariff, Gas Haze Trump Talks

WILL STEALTH F-35 FLY TO INDIA?

By Shivaji Sarkar 

India is set to deepen economic ties with the U.S. through a massive $500 billion purchase deal, securing crude oil, advanced weaponry—including the controversial F-35 stealth fighters—and tariff adjustments to align with U.S. trade demands. This move comes as President Donald Trump, known for his tough stance on trade, agrees to the deal, making India the fourth country reportedly offered the F-35 after Israel, South Korea, and Singapore. Developed at a staggering cost of $1.17 trillion, the F-35’s potential induction into India’s arsenal raises concerns about its impact on the country’s Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative. 

India’s indigenous LCA programme has already faced setbacks due to delays in U.S. engine supplies. The F-35, a single-engine fighter, may not be optimal for high-intensity operations against adversaries like China or Pakistan. Meanwhile, Russia has offered the Su-57 Felon under an accelerated Make-in-India proposal, with production potentially commencing by year-end. 

Ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 36-hour visit to Washington, Trump signed revised global tariff regulations. At a joint press conference with Modi, he took aim at India’s high tariffs, vowing to impose reciprocal import taxes. “Whatever India charges, we charge them. So frankly, it no longer matters to us that much what they charge,” Trump stated, underscoring his hardline approach to trade negotiations.Modi nodded to it saying, “One thing that I deeply appreciate, and I learn from President Trump, is that he keeps the national interest supreme”, Modi said. “Like him, I also keep the national interest of India at the top of everything else”. 

Tariff levelling is a complex process. It’s just not the import duties. It also demands review of concessions and other facilities to domestic industries. It may impact Indian industrial production or it has to rejig production expenses to help America pay a low tariff, which Trump says the US charges from its importers. It demolishes barriers, opens up the markets to pouring US goods. Trump is certainly not happy with India’s budgetary duty cuts from 70 percent on Harley Davidson bikes to 30 percent or cuts on lithium-ion batteries. Electrical vehicles are no more his priority.

“Tariff”, says Richard Rossow, head of the India programme at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, “is going to be a boxing match. India is willing to take a few hits, but there's a limit.” The U.S. has a $45.6 billion trade deficit with India. Overall, the U.S. trade-weighted average tariff rate has been about 2.2 percent, according to World Trade Organisation data, compared with India’s 12 percent, though the US says it’s much more. 

Prime Minister Modi opened up his kitty for petroleum purchases to $25 billion from the current $15 billion to help Trump push significantly increase US oil production and even exports, for which he employed the slogan “Drill, baby, drill”. In November, S&P Global Commodity Insights (SPGCI) said that it expected Asian oil buyers, including India, to witness significantly more opportunities to import “attractively priced crude from the US” as its competition with the OPEC (Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) suppliers intensifies. 

Business giant Trump categorically says, “Washington hopes to become top oil and gas supplier to New Delhi”. In simple terms India has to give up the choice of closer and convenient market, like West Asia. Saudi Arabia remains India’s third largest petroleum supplier with 39.5 MMT.  Iran was shut years ago under the US sanctions. It’s not yet clear how it would impinge on Russian oil purchases that bolstered profits of country’s two giant private refiners. 

India has continued its ties with Russia as it carries out its war with Ukraine. India has remained a major consumer of Russian energy, while the West cut down its own consumption since the war started. “The world had this thinking that India somehow is a neutral country in this whole process,” said Modi, “But this is not true. India has a side, and that side is of peace.” 

According to India’s official trade data, in January-November of 2024, India imported 7.2 million tonnes of oil from the US, which accounted for 3.2 per cent of New Delhi’s overall oil imports. Russia is currently India’s top oil supplier, followed by Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and the US. As for LNG, India imported 5.12 million tonnes from the US in January-November 2024, accounting for 20.2 per cent of India’s overall LNG imports for the period. 

Higher freight, while also a factor in importing light natural gas (LNG) from the US, is stated to be compensated by American gas priced at a discount and landed price would be lower than West Asian imports. There is another issue. During the recent Israel-Gaza-Houthi (Yemen)-Hezbollah (Lebanon)-war, India’s DAP fertiliser imports had to detour African continent adding to its prices, longer travel and supply delays. It also hampered the India-Middle East-Europe Corridor (IMEEC) aiming to integrate India, Europe, and the Middle-East through UAE, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Israel and the European Union being built by an Indian business house, which has taken over Israel’s Haifa port. These problems may multiply. 

Indian strategists are not confident with highly expensive single-engine F-35. India and the United States signed a deal to import 31 Predator drones from General Atomics in October 2024. The deal is valued at around $4 billion and is intended to improve India's surveillance capabilities. 

According to the US Congressional Research Service, New Delhi is expected to spend more than $200bn over the next decade to modernise its military. Its strategic planners want to replace Russia which till now remains the topmost arms supplier. 

India being a very heavy energy consumer is now eyeing nuclear energy due to the low carbon source of base power generation. Except usual rhetorics not much concrete has emerged though India has been talking with Westinghouse for a reactor.None clarified whether certain issues like summonses against some Indian dignitaries were resolved or not. 

It is likely that the F-35 offer would go through deep scrutiny. India had not approached the US for this aircraft but has come as an offer during Modi’s visit. The tariff would remain an issue along with US concern for selling more petroleum crude. The prime minister’s visit has gone through many US machinations. While some like the crude and gas imports may fructify for a short period. it needs to be observed how many other strategic US offers finally come out. Tariff and illegal immigration, however, would remain the most uncomfortable issues with many possible punches.---INFA 

(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)

 

 

 

Modi in France: EN ROUTE TO USA, By Dr. D.K. Giri, 14 February 2025 Print E-mail

Round The World

New Delhi, 14 February 2025

Modi in France

En route to USA

By Dr. D.K. Giri

(Prof. NIIS Group of Institutions, Odisha) 

The controversy on the participation of Prime Minister Modi in the swearing-in of Donald Trump figured prominently in the Indian media and the political community. Critiques construed it as a snub by the US President while US spokespersons mainly the former ambassador to New Delhi Eric Garcetti treated it as a trivial matter in line with the convention set by the White House. Heads of Governments and States were usually not invited to the oath-taking of US Presidents. Although the convention was set aside as few Heads including that of China were invited. It is another thing that Chinese President declined it. Garcetti did say that Prime Minister Modi should meet Donald Trump one-to-one instead of being a part of the crowd and he was sure that Modi was soon to be invited, sometime in February. The invitation came and Modi is, at the time of writing, in USA.

The question that is being addressed, in addition to taking account of Modi’s visit to France, is why Modi had to go to USA via Paris. It can again be interpreted in two ways. One, his schedule in Paris was prefixed and the invitation from USA almost aligned with the dates with his visit to France. Modi was in France from 10 to12 February and on the 13th he landed in USA. The timings for both visits could at best be fortuitous because Donald Trump’s office could not align their invitation with Modi’s visit to Paris. Second, Modi himself would have asked for these dates as he was scheduled to attend the international conference on AI in Paris.

The interpretation of Modi’s visit via Paris is in order as it has implicit political implications. In global geo-politics, structurally, France and USA may be on the same side, but in their strategic thinking, there is a clear divergence. France has been historically seeking to create an alternative centre of power to the Anglo-American axis. Britain, on the other hand, has been solidly in American camp since the Second World War. Apart from the colonial rivalry between France and Britain, they were diametrically opposite to each other in their positioning in geo-political order, especially vis-à-vis America which emerged as the super power.

Currently, France expects a multi-polar world where it can play its traditional world role. Likewise, India has moved on from Non-Alignment to strategic autonomy, a euphemism for multi-alignment which is possible in a multi-polar world. That is where France and India converge resulting in deepening of their bilateral relations. Whether this strategy will succeed is a matter of debate. The historical evidence testifies that world has always been divided into two blocs. In the Second World War, it was between the Allied powers and the Axis between Germany, Italy and Japan. The equations have dramatically changed since. The two new blocs then were led by two super powers – USA and USSR. With the disintegration of the latter, China has somewhat replaced USSR. Again, in the wake of the Ukrainian war, the two undeclared blocs are NATO and the Russia-China-North Korea axis which could be replaced by BRICS or SCO.

Arguably, a multi-polar world envisaged by France, Germany and India and a few other countries may be an aspiration, not a reality. Therefore, it is in India’s interest to deepen bilateral relations with friendly countries like France but not make it a part of its foreign policy strategy. Some of us have consistently argued that non-alignment or strategic autonomy is a non-starter.

That said, let us count the take-aways from Modi’s visit to France. The primary purpose was to co-chair the third AI Action Summit in Paris. The first one was held in Bletchley Park, Milton Keynes, England in November 2023 and second in Seoul in May 2024. The next summit will take place in 2026 in India. That is the first welcome outcome of his visit. These summits and collaborations have become important following the tech disruption by China’s DeepSeek. Notably, India also is building its own AI model.

Prime Minister Modi was also a distinguished guest among the world leaders in the dinner hosted by President Macron at Palais de l'Élysée (Elysee Palace). Other prominent leaders included US Vice- President J.D. Vance and the Chinese Vice-PM. Such exclusive dinners indicate the proximity and prominence of world leaders attending.

Both leaders inaugurated a new Indian Consulate in Marseille City. This denotes an expansion of India’s diplomatic presence in France. As usual, Prime Minister Modi met the Indian Diaspora, addressed the CEOs – Indians (based in France) and French. He encouraged the French CEOs to take advantage of the enormous investment opportunities emerging in India. This has been a consistent attempt by Modi wherever he visits to attract investors to Indian market. Sadly though, his warmth and charisma are not matched by the facilitation for foreign investors on the ground back home.

Another significant take-away is the increasing collaboration between France and India on the nuclear sector. When US facilitated India’s entry into NSG, France was the first country to sign an agreement with India on nuclear exchange. France strongly believes that nuclear power is an alternative to fossil fuel and for low-carbon economy. Almost 70% of electricity in France is generated by the nuclear power. India could seriously consider harnessing nuclear energy for electricity which is in deficit in most parts of the country. Both countries signed a Letter of Intent on Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Advanced Modular Reactors (AMRs). These should accelerate the process of converting nuclear energy into electricity. Upgradation of Jaitapur nuclear plant also figured in bilateral discussion.

Indo-France Year of Innovation will be celebrated in New Delhi in March 2026 by launching their respective logos. This is an important milestone in creating new technologies to counter the domination by countries like China. Remember, technology will be a major determinant in international relations. Security experts are in fact predicting that if there is a third world war, it will be fought by technology mainly AI and other emerging types – DeepSeek and so on.

This visit was Modi’s sixth to France. French President Emmanuel Macron was the Chief Guest in Republic Day Parade last year. Obviously, India-France relations are close and growing. This is an uplifting development, especially when European Union seems atrophied in international relations. The only rider to this bilateralism is the need of a clear strategic security perspective, not based on past experiences and present prejudices. ---INFA

(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)

 

 

 

PARLIAMENT REQUIRES REFORM, By Inder Jit, 13 February 2025 Print E-mail

REWIND

New Delhi, 13 February 2025

PARLIAMENT REQUIRES REFORM

By Inder Jit

(Released on 10 May 1983) 

Parliament continues to slide downhill. Its decline touched a new low during the budget session even as the outgoing Public Accounts Committee of the two Houses has boldly sought to strengthen Parliament and give it a new, welcome thrust. Parliament's greatest strength and utility lies in its power over the treasury. Not many among the younger generation seem to remember that the first big battle of democracy was fought in Britain on the question of the right of a King to impose taxes on his subjects at will. The people won at the end of the long and hard struggle and the world saw the birth of a fundamental canon of democracy: no taxation without representation. The principle is strictly enforced in all democracies. In fact, Britain and other democracies have over the past many years even taken new initiatives to strengthen Parliament's control over the purse. In sharp and distressing contrast, Parliament's control over the national budget in India is slipping step by step, year by year.

Incredibly enough, the demands of only eight ministries with an over-all budget of Rs 13,000 crores were discussed and voted during the session. The demands of some 15 ministries and eight departments totalling Rs 10,000 crores, an all-time record, were guillotined in one fell stroke and voted without any discussion. This would be wholly wrong even if the debates guillotined (on account of lack of time) related, so to say, to ministries or departments of not great national importance. But matters have been made infinitely worse because the list of guillotined ministries and departments that deal in subjects which are part of the Prime Minister's much-trumpeted 20 Point Progranme and are of basic concern to the people. These include the Ministries of Health and Family Welfare, Education and Culture, Information and Broadcasting, Housing and Communications as also the core sectors of the Plan like Steel and Mines, Fertilizers and Chemicals, Transport, Science and Technology, including Atomic Energy and Space.

Not only that. A probe into the records has yielded information which is at once astonishing and scandalous. Everyone wants at least three basic things in life: roti, kapra aur makaan (food, clothing and housing.) Most thinking people regret that even after 35 years of freedom the country has no policy worth the name which encourages people to build houses. Even today the well known quip holds good that fools build houses and wise men live in them. Thousands of crores of rupees have been spent on housing and many more on various public works. Yet, readers will be astounded to know that the functioning of the Works and Housing Ministry, which includes the Delhi Development Authority, has been discussed only once in the past eleven years -- in 1978. Education and Health and Family Welfare, which appropriately enjoy top priority, have been discussed by Parliament only once in the past five years. The estimates of the Social Welfare Ministry have not been discussed during the last five years.

More. Nehru attached the highest importance to planning and planned development. He was also anxious to see India become a modern nation with a scientific outlook. Indeed, he went all out to encourage science and technology -- as also the development of atomic energy for peaceful purposes. His initiative and vision have enabled India to become the third foremost country in scientific manpower. Yet, Parliament has had little say on these subjects. The Planning Ministry and through it the Planning Commission have been discussed only once in twelve years -- in 1979 during the Janata rule. The Departments of Atomic Energy and Electronics have not been scrutinised by Parliament even once in the last thirteen years. The Department of Science and Technology has also been discussed only once in the past six years -- in 1979. Incidentally, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting was discussed last in 1981 -- once in five years.

Parliament has a right to apply the guillotine on the budgetary demands of ministries because of the constraints of time. Why? The Finance Bill has to be voted by April 30. Nevertheless, Nehru cut down resort to the guillotine to the minimum by securing the cooperation of all sections of the Lok Sabha as a dedicated Leader of the House. In 1960 and 1962, for instance, discussions in regard to the following five heads only were guillotined: Atomic Energy, Department of Parliamentary Affairs, Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha and the Vice President's Secretariat. The number shot up three times to 15 in 1967 (a year after Mrs Gandhi took over as Prime Minister), to 24 in 1975, 25 in 1980 and 25 in 1983. Nehru stood for a debate on the functioning of all ministries and departments. At one stage, he accepted a suggestion for a discussion on the "guillotined" ministries and departments on the basis of their annual reports presented to Parliament -- after the Finance Bill was voted.

True, Parliament has changed greatly since Nehru. A lot of the Lok Sabha's time gets taken up by the daily rumpus or hangama that invariably erupts at the zero hour. Nonetheless, Parliament's basic role and responsibility remains unchanged. Clearly, there is need for all concerned to find a solution. As the leader of the House, Mrs Gandhi needs to spend more time in the Lok Sabha (like her father) and reassure the Opposition that she does not regard herself to be "above Parliament". (Her absence from the House during the debate on Punjab led to strong protests by the Opposition.) Mrs Gandhi is entitled to have "reservations" about Parliament's functioning. But she owes it to the country to spell out the "reservations" and restore health to the system. The Opposition undoubtedly "upsets the schedule and creates problems" from the Government's viewpoint. But the Opposition is often more sinned against than sinning. Queried an Opposition leader: "What do you expect us to do when questions are not answered, information brazenly denied and discussions blocked?"

Happily, no great human ingenuity is required for coming forward with a possible solution. An obvious way out is to get the Lok Sabha (as also the Rajya Sabha) to sit longer hours each day and to meet for a larger number of days in a year. The Lok Sabha met for only 92 days last year and is unlikely to do very much better in the current year. (Even Opposition MPs, I am told, opposed a suggestion for extending the budget session.) During Nehru's time, the Lok Sabha never met for less than a hundred days in the course of a year when the time lost in hangamas was much, much less. The first Lok Sabha met for 103 days in its first year -- 1952. In the next two years it met for 137 days each. The number of days shot up to 151 days in 1956. In his last full year, 1963, the Lok Sabha met for 122 days -- a month longer than in 1982. Mrs Gandhi started off well with 119 days in 1966, 120 days each in 1968, 1969 and 1973 and 119 days in 1973. But the number fell to its lowest of 63 in 1975.

This should improve matters. But only up to a point. The real answer, as I have said before, lies in the committee system, as shown by the Mother of Parliaments: Westminster. Happily, the idea is favoured by the Speaker, Mr Bal Ram Jakhar, as also by at least one former Speaker and leading MPs. The outgoing Public Accounts Committee, headed by Mr Satish Agarwal, BJP, has shown what a committee can do to enforce accountability over the Government. (The late Jyotirmoy Bosu of the CPM, who is greatly missed, made the country sit up with his sensational investigative reports as Chairman of the Committee on Public Undertakings.) The PAC under Mr Agarwal examined the functioning of the Planning Commission for the first time and helped the people to discover for the first time the colossal failure of planning in just one sphere -- irrigation. "We would not need to import food-grains today," he told me, "If only our planning was sound and schemes had been implemented. We could have saved Rs 5,000 crores on food imports this year alone!"

The PAC, which has also rendered yeomen service by spotlighting many more skeletons in various ministerial cupboards, has appropriately recommended that the existing Committee be split into two -- one for Revenue and the other for Expenditure. The recommendation, I gather, has been considered by the Rules Committee which, in tum, has sought the views of the Finance Ministry. But this by itself is not enough. What we need in our Parliament today is the boldness and initiative shown by the Commons some six years ago. Chronically dissatisfied with its procedures and anxious to adopt them to changing demands made upon it, the Commons set up a Select Committee on Procedure to make recommendations for the more effective performance of its functions. The Committee carried out a broad and significant review of the way the Commons worked and mainly recommended establishment of Select Committee to enable the Commons "to exercise affective control and stewardship over ministers and the expanding bureaucracy of the state for which they are answerable."

Parliamentary control over the Government in Britain is today exercised through twelve Committees in addition to the Public Accounts Committee and the Committee on Parliamentary Commissioners (the Ombudsman). What is more, Parliament's activities in Britain are becoming progressively more 'open' through grass-roots enquiries. Until 1965, no Select Committee had heard evidence in public for many years. Now the great majority of hearings are open to the public (except where strictly confidential evidence is being given) Advance notices are published in the Press. All this has lessons for India where more and more people are justifiably dissatisfied with Parliament, which today cannot even boast of great debates. The Lok Sabha's powers have greatly eroded, constraining the Speaker to express himself against increase by the Government of diesel and kerosone prices through notification on the eve of the budget session. We must face bitter facts and mend matters before it is too late. The Commons continues to grow even today -- after an existence of almost 300 years. Must we stop growing at 30? ---INFA

(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)

 

<< Start < Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>

Results 118 - 126 of 6263
 
   
     
 
 
  Mambo powered by Best-IT