Political
Diary
New Delhi, 30 June 2020
Our Pygmy
Leaders
LOOKING FOR GIANTS
By
Poonam I Kaushish
A fundamental principle of a civilised nation is that in
times of war, the polity displays cohesiveness and rallies around the leader.
The vitriolic negative tu-tu-mein-mein
battle
royale between the Congress and
BJP being played out over Chinese incursions in Eastern Ladakh, the
Galwan Valley, Pangong Tso, Desang up to the Y-junction etc turns this dictum
on its head.
As Prime Minister
Modi faces his toughest challenge and his Government is busy formulating a response
to the formidable challenge posed by the Chinese threat, trust a desperate
Congress to extract political
mileage by its calumny accusing the BJP of playing a “diabolical game of
deception” to divert attention from the alleged ‘Chinese occupation of Indian
territory’.
The Grand Dame also
brought out past instances of the BJP’s engagement with China’s ruling
Communist Party to question Modi on what results did his Party’s bonhomie with
the Chinese Establishment have for India. Modi as Gujarat Chief Minister
visited China four times, then as Prime Minister five times, and invited
Chinese President Xi Jinping to India three times and met 18 times in the last
six years.
Adding, “When Modi
and the Chinese Premier were sitting together on the banks of the Sabarmati, at
the same time the Chinese were carrying out incursions in Ladakh’s Chumar
valley. Finally when the Chinese withdrew, it was a conditional withdrawal and
we agreed to those conditions… then in 2017 came the Doklam standoff and ever
since there have been reports of large scale construction activity continuing
by China in Doklam,”
Again, in May 2014,
the BJP came to power and in November the Party sent 13 MPs and MLAs to China
to strengthen relations between the two ruling Parties and study the Chinese
political system. It questioned the Sangh on what the Chinese Global Times meant
by stating, “China finds itself very comfortable working with Mr. Modi”
“Is it also not correct that in January 2011,
the then BJP President Nitin Gadkari took a delegation of the BJP to China and
held detailed consultations. Were they anti-India consultations? Is it not
correct the RSS held consultations on strategic issues of Arunachal Pradesh and
Tibet with the Communist Party of China politburo members in 2009, though it
isn’t a political Party. And in 2008 the BJP received a Chinese delegation and
held confabulations with them.
It reminded the Prime
Minister “he must be mindful of the implications of his words” and “cannot
allow China to use them as a vindication of its position”. Further, instead of
the Government preparing to hit back at China and recapture its territory lost
in the Galwan valley it was targeting the Congress to hide its own “strategic
blunders”.
Countered the BJP, there
is a secret relationship between Congress and China. These people take funds
from China and then conduct studies that are not in the interest of the
country. During Congress-led UPA rule in 2005-6 the “family-run” Rajiv Gandhi
Foundation took $300,000 from People’s Republic of China and the Chinese
embassy to carry out these studies on free trade agreement between India and
China and suggested it to be beneficial to India. At the same time the Prime
Minister's National Relief Fund too donated money to the RGF.
Sarcasticlly
asserting, “You take $300,000 donation and teach us nationalism. Haathi ke daant dikhaneke aur khane ke alag
hote hain. Who sat on the PMNRF board? Smt. Sonia Gandhi. Who chairs RGF?
Smt. Sonia Gandhi. The PMNRF donated money to RGF thrice when the UPA was in
power. This is brazen fraud and totally reprehensible.”
The BJP also accused
former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh of “abjectly surrendering” hundreds of
square kilometres of India’s land to China and presiding over 600 incursions
made by the neighbouring country between 2010 and 2013. The mistakes of one
family made us lose 43,000 sq km of land.”
Raising a moot point:
How does merely questioning the Government on action taken, intelligence
failure or criticizing the Government tantamount to being a desh drohi? Have are netagan lost their ability to handle
criticism? Bordering on a narcissist phobia? Is it mere coincidence or a sign
of an increasingly knee-jerk, reactionary country? Should a debate become
litmus of one’s patriotism?’ And is nationalism per se a justification to stifle critique?
Arguably, it’s not
the tu-tu-mein-mein which worries me,
an issue which will die its natural death within days. However, this time round
what greatly troubles one is that these ‘small minds’ have willy nilly made a gulli-danda of national security. What
one is concerned about is that our leaders only want to score brownie points It
is nobody's contention that uncomfortable questions regarding national security
should not be raised. But that is a topic for another day and another time when
the immediate threat has faded.
True, it can be
argued that the on-going shenanigans over Chinese incursion in Eastern
Ladakh replete with petty games of
one-upmamship played out on the political chessboard by the Congress and BJP
are things we have grown accustomed to by a petty self-serving polity, which
thinks only of me, mine and myself.
Of a political
landscape dotted with politico-criminals in their “bullet-proof jackets” ----
MPs and MLAs tag replete with scams and scandals unlimited. Of netas who have merrily converted offices
of public services into private profit and justify their wrongs as in public
interest. Failing to realize the disconnect between the jan sevak and the janata.
Clearly, India is
going through a unique dynamics due to the shortage of leadership bringing
things to such a pass whereby our Indian political class is completely
disengaged with issues of national import and long term national well-being.
Neither do they have the time for what is a real threat to our nation State and
external security.
Alas, nitpicking and
scepticism rule the roost rather than objective analysis. The current imbroglio
suffers the same fate as Parties instead of raising questions behind closed
doors do so publicly. The Congress, which has ruled the country for 70 years
should show restraint as it knows only too well that the Government of the day
has the country’s best interest at heart.
The
Modi Sarkar is equally guilty. Instead of debriefing the Opposition on the
seriousness of the threat it is busy in perception management and scoring
points. Are they so paranoid or intolerant that questions on national security
or any act of criticism is viewed as a threat to the nation? As the Government
it should take criticism in its stride, instead of reading every question as an
act of “anti-national.
Undoubtedly,
dissent and debate are the cornerstone of democracy and respecting differing
opinions is paramount. But not at the cost at the cost of national security as
it undermines national resolve and attempts to demoralise defence forces while
an expansionist power hovers menacingly at our borders.
At
the end of the day, our leaders who reduce the level of discourse to such
depths only do so at the cost of exposing their lack of civility to the nation
at large. Leaving India dangerously divided as the hectoring will only serve to weaken the national resolve.
The time has come for
the people to look at the perilous implications of the on-going BJP-Congress
acrimonious mud-slinging on the unity, integrity and the future of the country.
People, no doubt, get the leaders and the Government they deserve. Certainly, criticism
is a sign of a thriving and robust democracy.
Yet, at the end of
the day, the strength of democracy is largely determined by the ability of its
leaders to discharge their duties honourably. The moot point: Are we going to
mortgage our conscience to ‘small minds’? Allow petty leaders to recklessly
play havoc with India? How long are we
going to continue to look for giants among the pygmies and let them to
ride-roughshod over us? Will they rise to the challenges facing the country? To
stand up and be counted? ---- INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)
|